Patterns of analgesic utilisation among people with knee osteoarthritis: a cohort study using UK primary care data.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2455067
Aqila Taqi, Sonia Gran, Roger David Knaggs
{"title":"Patterns of analgesic utilisation among people with knee osteoarthritis: a cohort study using UK primary care data.","authors":"Aqila Taqi, Sonia Gran, Roger David Knaggs","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2455067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent disabling joint disease affecting more than 300 million people globally and knees are most commonly affected. It is associated with pain and functional limitation that adversely affect mental well-being and compromise quality of life. Analgesic use is common among patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), however, data on patterns of analgesics use at an individual patient level are sparse. The present study describes patterns of analgesic use, by determining the proportion of persistent users within one year of therapy initiation in patients with KOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the clinical practice research datalink. Analgesic prescriptions for adults with an incident KOA diagnosis were captured and grouped into five exposure groups including: antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol. A persistent user was a person who used >180 defined daily doses (DDDs) per year and had prescriptions in at least three out of the four quarters of the year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variable proportions of patients used respective analgesic classes persistently during the first year after prescribing; 36.8% of antidepressant users, 27.0% of NSAIDs, 23.8% of AEDs, 17.5% of paracetamol and 14.9% of opioid users were persistent users. Across classes, persistent users were slightly younger, were issued more prescriptions and used higher doses of analgesics compared to non-persistent users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Between 14.9% and 36.8% became persistent analgesic users by the end of the first year after their initial prescription. The study applied meaningful clinical attributes to define persistence. This informs future research on clinical and adverse drug outcomes in persistent users compared to non-persistent users across five separate analgesic classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2455067"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2455067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent disabling joint disease affecting more than 300 million people globally and knees are most commonly affected. It is associated with pain and functional limitation that adversely affect mental well-being and compromise quality of life. Analgesic use is common among patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), however, data on patterns of analgesics use at an individual patient level are sparse. The present study describes patterns of analgesic use, by determining the proportion of persistent users within one year of therapy initiation in patients with KOA.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the clinical practice research datalink. Analgesic prescriptions for adults with an incident KOA diagnosis were captured and grouped into five exposure groups including: antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol. A persistent user was a person who used >180 defined daily doses (DDDs) per year and had prescriptions in at least three out of the four quarters of the year.

Results: Variable proportions of patients used respective analgesic classes persistently during the first year after prescribing; 36.8% of antidepressant users, 27.0% of NSAIDs, 23.8% of AEDs, 17.5% of paracetamol and 14.9% of opioid users were persistent users. Across classes, persistent users were slightly younger, were issued more prescriptions and used higher doses of analgesics compared to non-persistent users.

Conclusion: Between 14.9% and 36.8% became persistent analgesic users by the end of the first year after their initial prescription. The study applied meaningful clinical attributes to define persistence. This informs future research on clinical and adverse drug outcomes in persistent users compared to non-persistent users across five separate analgesic classes.

膝关节骨关节炎患者镇痛药使用模式:一项使用英国初级保健数据的队列研究。
背景:骨关节炎(OA)是一种普遍的致残性关节疾病,影响全球超过3亿人,膝盖是最常见的疾病。它与疼痛和功能限制有关,对精神健康和生活质量产生不利影响。镇痛药的使用在膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者中很常见,然而,单个患者镇痛药使用模式的数据很少。本研究通过确定KOA患者在治疗开始一年内持续使用镇痛药的比例,描述了镇痛药使用的模式。方法:采用临床实践研究数据链进行回顾性队列研究。收集确诊为KOA的成人的镇痛药处方,并将其分为5个暴露组,包括:抗抑郁药、抗癫痫药(aed)、阿片类药物、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和扑热息痛。长期使用者是指每年使用180个规定日剂量(DDDs)并在一年的四个季度中至少有三个季度有处方的人。结果:不同比例的患者在处方后一年内持续使用各自的镇痛药物;36.8%的抗抑郁药使用者、27.0%的非甾体抗炎药使用者、23.8%的AEDs使用者、17.5%的扑热息痛使用者和14.9%的阿片类药物使用者是持续使用者。在各个班级中,与非持久使用者相比,持久使用者稍微年轻一些,得到了更多的处方,使用了更高剂量的止痛药。结论:14.9%至36.8%的患者在首次处方后一年内成为持续使用镇痛药的患者。该研究应用有意义的临床属性来定义持久性。这为未来的临床和不良药物结果研究提供了信息,这些研究将在五种不同的镇痛药物类别中与非持久使用者进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信