Validation of the Thai Version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8T) in Chronic Pain Patients.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S500597
Koravee Pasutharnchat, Rattaphol Seangrung, Prateep Lertmongkonaksorn, Sirima Kamdeang
{"title":"Validation of the Thai Version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8T) in Chronic Pain Patients.","authors":"Koravee Pasutharnchat, Rattaphol Seangrung, Prateep Lertmongkonaksorn, Sirima Kamdeang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S500597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic pain significantly affects patients' quality of life, leading to the avoidance of activities that exacerbate their pain. Embracing pain acceptance and willingness is crucial to maintain patients' functionality. This study aimed to translate and validate the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8) into the Thai language and to facilitate the assessment of pain acceptance in Thai patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study involved the translation of the English CPAQ-8 into a Thai version, subsequently, referred to as the CPAQ-8T. The psychometric properties of the CPAQ-8T were examined. Study participants were administered a set of questionnaires, including the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), CPAQ-8T, and the Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Test-retest reliability was assessed by readministering the CPAQ-8T two weeks after the initial test. The validity and overall reliability of the CPAQ-8T were thoroughly assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 160 patients with chronic pain at pain clinic, Ramathibodi Hospital completed all the questionnaires. The mean CPAQ-8T score was 24.2 (SD = 7.26). The CPAQ-8T score exhibited the expected correlation with the Barthel Index for ADL but showed no significant correlation with the VAS score, indicating moderate convergent validity. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability findings support the validity and reliability of the CPAQ-8T.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The translation and validation of the CPAQ-8 into the Thai language offers a reliable and valid instrument for assessing pain acceptance in Thai patients with chronic pain. The results suggested that the CPAQ-8T is a valuable tool for healthcare professionals and researchers working in the field of chronic pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"947-957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S500597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic pain significantly affects patients' quality of life, leading to the avoidance of activities that exacerbate their pain. Embracing pain acceptance and willingness is crucial to maintain patients' functionality. This study aimed to translate and validate the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8) into the Thai language and to facilitate the assessment of pain acceptance in Thai patients.

Patients and methods: The study involved the translation of the English CPAQ-8 into a Thai version, subsequently, referred to as the CPAQ-8T. The psychometric properties of the CPAQ-8T were examined. Study participants were administered a set of questionnaires, including the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), CPAQ-8T, and the Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Test-retest reliability was assessed by readministering the CPAQ-8T two weeks after the initial test. The validity and overall reliability of the CPAQ-8T were thoroughly assessed.

Results: A total of 160 patients with chronic pain at pain clinic, Ramathibodi Hospital completed all the questionnaires. The mean CPAQ-8T score was 24.2 (SD = 7.26). The CPAQ-8T score exhibited the expected correlation with the Barthel Index for ADL but showed no significant correlation with the VAS score, indicating moderate convergent validity. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability findings support the validity and reliability of the CPAQ-8T.

Conclusion: The translation and validation of the CPAQ-8 into the Thai language offers a reliable and valid instrument for assessing pain acceptance in Thai patients with chronic pain. The results suggested that the CPAQ-8T is a valuable tool for healthcare professionals and researchers working in the field of chronic pain management.

泰国版慢性疼痛接受度问卷-8 (CPAQ-8T)在慢性疼痛患者中的验证。
目的:慢性疼痛显著影响患者的生活质量,导致患者回避加重疼痛的活动。对疼痛的接受和意愿对维持患者的功能至关重要。本研究旨在将慢性疼痛接受度问卷-8 (CPAQ-8)翻译并验证为泰语,以促进泰国患者疼痛接受度的评估。患者和方法:研究包括将英文CPAQ-8翻译成泰语版本,随后被称为CPAQ-8T。检验了CPAQ-8T的心理测量特性。研究对象接受100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)、CPAQ-8T和Barthel日常生活活动指数(ADL)问卷调查。在首次测试后两周重新给药CPAQ-8T来评估重测信度。对CPAQ-8T的效度和总体信度进行全面评估。结果:160例在Ramathibodi医院疼痛门诊就诊的慢性疼痛患者完成了问卷调查。平均CPAQ-8T评分为24.2分(SD = 7.26)。CPAQ-8T评分与ADL的Barthel指数呈预期相关,与VAS评分无显著相关,具有中等收敛效度。内部一致性和重测信度结果支持CPAQ-8T的效度和信度。结论:CPAQ-8的泰语翻译和验证为评估泰国慢性疼痛患者的疼痛接受度提供了一种可靠有效的工具。结果表明,CPAQ-8T是医疗保健专业人员和研究人员在慢性疼痛管理领域工作的一个有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信