Low dose ondansetron with dexamethasone for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic cholecystectomy-A randomized double-blind study.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Geetanjali T Chilkoti, Janaki Nandanan, Ashok Kumar Saxena, Varun Seth, Navneet Kaur, Prakriti Maurya
{"title":"Low dose ondansetron with dexamethasone for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic cholecystectomy-A randomized double-blind study.","authors":"Geetanjali T Chilkoti, Janaki Nandanan, Ashok Kumar Saxena, Varun Seth, Navneet Kaur, Prakriti Maurya","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_357_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Ondansetron and dexamethasone combination is effective for prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Ondansetron, when compared to dexamethasone, is known to cause more adverse effects and is relatively expensive. The present study evaluated the efficacy of standard dose and low dose ondansetron, i.e. 100 μg/kg and 50 μg/kg, respectively, with dexamethasone 8 mg for PONV prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After the approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee-Human Research [IEC-HR] and prospective CTRI registration, this randomized, double-blind interventional study was conducted following informed consent from each participant. Patients aged 18-65 years of either sex, with ASA physical status I or II, undergoing LC under general anesthesia, were included and divided into groups C and L. Patients in groups C and L received 100 μg and 50 μg of ondansetron, respectively, in combination with 8 mg dexamethasone. The incidence of PONV in first 6 hrs, PONV score, rescue antiemetic consumption, rescue analgesia, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 patients were included with 55 in each group. Incidence of PONV in the first 6 hours was found to be higher in 1-2 hour- and 2-3-hour time intervals in group L; but was significant only at 1-2-hour time interval (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Proportion of patients needing rescue antiemetic in the first 6 hours was higher in group L but was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed that 50 μg/kg combination of ondansetron was associated with higher incidence of post operative nausea in the immediate postoperative period than 100 μg/kg dose; however, no significant difference was observed in incidence of post-operative vomiting between two doses following LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 1","pages":"84-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_357_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Ondansetron and dexamethasone combination is effective for prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Ondansetron, when compared to dexamethasone, is known to cause more adverse effects and is relatively expensive. The present study evaluated the efficacy of standard dose and low dose ondansetron, i.e. 100 μg/kg and 50 μg/kg, respectively, with dexamethasone 8 mg for PONV prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Material and methods: After the approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee-Human Research [IEC-HR] and prospective CTRI registration, this randomized, double-blind interventional study was conducted following informed consent from each participant. Patients aged 18-65 years of either sex, with ASA physical status I or II, undergoing LC under general anesthesia, were included and divided into groups C and L. Patients in groups C and L received 100 μg and 50 μg of ondansetron, respectively, in combination with 8 mg dexamethasone. The incidence of PONV in first 6 hrs, PONV score, rescue antiemetic consumption, rescue analgesia, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded.

Results: A total of 110 patients were included with 55 in each group. Incidence of PONV in the first 6 hours was found to be higher in 1-2 hour- and 2-3-hour time intervals in group L; but was significant only at 1-2-hour time interval (P < 0.05). Proportion of patients needing rescue antiemetic in the first 6 hours was higher in group L but was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: We observed that 50 μg/kg combination of ondansetron was associated with higher incidence of post operative nausea in the immediate postoperative period than 100 μg/kg dose; however, no significant difference was observed in incidence of post-operative vomiting between two doses following LC.

低剂量昂丹司琼联合地塞米松预防腹腔镜胆囊切除术后恶心呕吐的随机双盲研究
背景与目的:昂丹司琼联合地塞米松可有效预防术后恶心呕吐(PONV)。与地塞米松相比,昂丹司琼的副作用更大,价格也相对昂贵。本研究评价标准剂量和低剂量昂丹司琼(分别为100 μg/kg和50 μg/kg)与地塞米松8 mg在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中预防PONV的疗效。材料和方法:经人类研究机构伦理委员会(IEC-HR)批准和前瞻性CTRI注册后,本随机双盲干预性研究在每位参与者知情同意的情况下进行。纳入年龄18-65岁,ASA身体状态I或II,全麻下行LC的患者,分为C组和L组。C组和L组患者分别给予昂丹司琼100 μg和50 μg,联合地塞米松8 mg。记录前6小时PONV发生率、PONV评分、抢救止吐药用量、抢救镇痛及血流动力学参数。结果:共纳入患者110例,每组55例。L组在1-2小时和2-3小时的时间间隔内,前6小时PONV的发病率较高;但仅在1 ~ 2 h间有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。L组患者前6小时需要抢救性止吐药的比例较高,但差异无统计学意义。结论:我们观察到50 μg/kg剂量的昂丹司琼在术后即刻恶心发生率高于100 μg/kg剂量;然而,LC后两种剂量的术后呕吐发生率无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信