Tej D Azad, Kathleen R Ran, Joshua D Materi, Divyaansh Raj, Timour Al-Khindi, Sameer Gabbita, Marvin Li, Elizabeth T Wang, A Karim Ahmed, Megan Parker, Anita L Kalluri, Daniel Lubelski, Christopher M Jackson, Daniel M Sciubba, Jon D Weingart, Ali Bydon, Timothy F Witham, David W Nauen, Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian, Nicholas Theodore, Chetan Bettegowda
{"title":"A multi-analyte blood test for acute spinal cord injury.","authors":"Tej D Azad, Kathleen R Ran, Joshua D Materi, Divyaansh Raj, Timour Al-Khindi, Sameer Gabbita, Marvin Li, Elizabeth T Wang, A Karim Ahmed, Megan Parker, Anita L Kalluri, Daniel Lubelski, Christopher M Jackson, Daniel M Sciubba, Jon D Weingart, Ali Bydon, Timothy F Witham, David W Nauen, Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian, Nicholas Theodore, Chetan Bettegowda","doi":"10.1172/JCI185463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUNDRapid diagnosis to facilitate urgent intervention is critical for treatment of acute spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesized that a multi-analyte blood biomarker would support point-of-care SCI diagnosis, correlate with injury severity, and predict long-term neurologic outcomes.METHODSDroplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays were designed to amplify differentially hypomethylated genomic loci in spinal cord tissue. An optimized ddPCR assay was applied to cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma samples collected from prospectively enrolled acute SCI patients. Targeted proteomic profiling was also performed. Spinal cord-derived cfDNA and plasma proteins were tested for their association with SCI and ability to predict conversion in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score at 6 months.RESULTSA bespoke ddPCR assay detected spinal cord-derived cfDNA in plasma of 50 patients with acute SCI (AUC: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95, P < 0.0001). Levels of cfDNA were highest in patients with the most severe injury, i.e., ASIA A, compared with those with ASIA B (P = 0.04), ASIA C (P = 0.009), and ASIA D injuries (P < 0.001). Dimensionality reduction identified 4 candidate proteins (FABP3, REST, IL-6, NF-H) that were integrated with spinal cord-derived cfDNA to derive the Spinal Cord Injury Index (SCII), which has high sensitivity and specificity for SCI diagnosis (AUC: 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, P < 0.0001), correlates with injury severity (P < 0.0001), and predicts 6-month neurologic improvement (AUC: 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.93, P = 0.006).CONCLUSIONThe detection of spinal cord-derived cfDNA and plasma protein alterations as part of a multi-analyte blood test can inform SCI diagnosis and prognosis.FUNDINGNorth American Spine Society Young Investigator Award; Morton Cure Paralysis Fund.</p>","PeriodicalId":15469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":"135 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI185463","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUNDRapid diagnosis to facilitate urgent intervention is critical for treatment of acute spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesized that a multi-analyte blood biomarker would support point-of-care SCI diagnosis, correlate with injury severity, and predict long-term neurologic outcomes.METHODSDroplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays were designed to amplify differentially hypomethylated genomic loci in spinal cord tissue. An optimized ddPCR assay was applied to cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma samples collected from prospectively enrolled acute SCI patients. Targeted proteomic profiling was also performed. Spinal cord-derived cfDNA and plasma proteins were tested for their association with SCI and ability to predict conversion in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score at 6 months.RESULTSA bespoke ddPCR assay detected spinal cord-derived cfDNA in plasma of 50 patients with acute SCI (AUC: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95, P < 0.0001). Levels of cfDNA were highest in patients with the most severe injury, i.e., ASIA A, compared with those with ASIA B (P = 0.04), ASIA C (P = 0.009), and ASIA D injuries (P < 0.001). Dimensionality reduction identified 4 candidate proteins (FABP3, REST, IL-6, NF-H) that were integrated with spinal cord-derived cfDNA to derive the Spinal Cord Injury Index (SCII), which has high sensitivity and specificity for SCI diagnosis (AUC: 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, P < 0.0001), correlates with injury severity (P < 0.0001), and predicts 6-month neurologic improvement (AUC: 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.93, P = 0.006).CONCLUSIONThe detection of spinal cord-derived cfDNA and plasma protein alterations as part of a multi-analyte blood test can inform SCI diagnosis and prognosis.FUNDINGNorth American Spine Society Young Investigator Award; Morton Cure Paralysis Fund.
背景:快速诊断以促进紧急干预对急性脊髓损伤(SCI)的治疗至关重要。我们假设一种多分析物血液生物标志物将支持即时脊髓损伤诊断,与损伤严重程度相关,并预测长期神经系统预后。方法设计液滴数字PCR (ddPCR)方法,扩增脊髓组织中差异低甲基化的基因组位点。优化的ddPCR方法应用于前瞻性纳入急性脊髓损伤患者血浆样本的游离DNA (cfDNA)。还进行了靶向蛋白质组学分析。脊髓源性cfDNA和血浆蛋白与脊髓损伤的相关性以及6个月时美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)评分预测脊髓损伤转化的能力。结果50例急性脊髓损伤患者血浆中检测到脊髓源性cfDNA (AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.95, P < 0.0001)。与ASIA B (P = 0.04)、ASIA C (P = 0.009)和ASIA D (P < 0.001)损伤患者相比,最严重损伤(即ASIA A)患者的cfDNA水平最高。降维鉴定出4种候选蛋白(FABP3、REST、IL-6、NF-H),它们与脊髓来源的cfDNA结合,得出脊髓损伤指数(SCII),该指数对脊髓损伤诊断具有高敏感性和特异性(AUC: 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, P < 0.0001),与损伤严重程度相关(P < 0.0001),并预测6个月神经系统改善(AUC: 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.93, P = 0.006)。结论脊髓源性cfDNA和血浆蛋白的检测作为多种分析物血液检查的一部分,可以为脊髓损伤的诊断和预后提供依据。资助北美脊柱学会青年研究者奖;莫顿麻痹治疗基金。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Investigation, established in 1924 by the ASCI, is a prestigious publication that focuses on breakthroughs in basic and clinical biomedical science, with the goal of advancing the field of medicine. With an impressive Impact Factor of 15.9 in 2022, it is recognized as one of the leading journals in the "Medicine, Research & Experimental" category of the Web of Science.
The journal attracts a diverse readership from various medical disciplines and sectors. It publishes a wide range of research articles encompassing all biomedical specialties, including Autoimmunity, Gastroenterology, Immunology, Metabolism, Nephrology, Neuroscience, Oncology, Pulmonology, Vascular Biology, and many others.
The Editorial Board consists of esteemed academic editors who possess extensive expertise in their respective fields. They are actively involved in research, ensuring the journal's high standards of publication and scientific rigor.