Perioperative approaches to prevent delayed neurocognitive recovery and postoperative neurocognitive disorder in older surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yasmin Alhamdah, Wei-Ya Li, Mahesh Nagappa, Ellene Yan, David He, Aparna Sarieplla, Marina Englesakis, Zeyad Elias, Matthew T V Chan, Dong-Xin Wang, Frances Chung
{"title":"Perioperative approaches to prevent delayed neurocognitive recovery and postoperative neurocognitive disorder in older surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yasmin Alhamdah, Wei-Ya Li, Mahesh Nagappa, Ellene Yan, David He, Aparna Sarieplla, Marina Englesakis, Zeyad Elias, Matthew T V Chan, Dong-Xin Wang, Frances Chung","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_396_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Delayed neurocognitive recovery (DNR) and postoperative neurocognitive disorder (P-NCD) are common postoperative complications affecting older patients. This review evaluates perioperative approaches for preventing DNR and P-NCD in older noncardiac surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched databases for relevant articles from inception through June 2022 and updated in May 2023 (PROSPERO ID CRD42022359289). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing intervention for DNR and/or P-NCD were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 39 RCTs involving anesthetic (25 RCTs, 7422 patients) and other pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches (14 RCTs, 2210 patients). Seventeen trials investigating four interventions were included in the meta-analysis for DNR. Perioperative dexmedetomidine (relative risk [RR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.97; <i>P</i> = 0.04) and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.98; <i>P</i> = 0.03) significantly decreased the risk of DNR versus control. There was no significant decrease in the risk of DNR with regional anesthesia (RA) versus general anesthesia (GA) (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.63-1.26) or bispectral index (BIS) monitoring (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.60-1.04) versus the control groups. Evidence regarding the effects of interventions on P-NCD is limited. Although all included trials were at low risk of bias, the quality of meta-analysis pooled estimates was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis of RCTs showed that dexmedetomidine and TIVA decrease the risk of DNR in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery by 41% and 20%, respectively, versus control. Further RCTs of adequate power and methodology on the effects of interventions on DNR and P-NCD are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 1","pages":"3-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_396_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Delayed neurocognitive recovery (DNR) and postoperative neurocognitive disorder (P-NCD) are common postoperative complications affecting older patients. This review evaluates perioperative approaches for preventing DNR and P-NCD in older noncardiac surgical patients.

Material and methods: We searched databases for relevant articles from inception through June 2022 and updated in May 2023 (PROSPERO ID CRD42022359289). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing intervention for DNR and/or P-NCD were included.

Results: We included 39 RCTs involving anesthetic (25 RCTs, 7422 patients) and other pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches (14 RCTs, 2210 patients). Seventeen trials investigating four interventions were included in the meta-analysis for DNR. Perioperative dexmedetomidine (relative risk [RR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.97; P = 0.04) and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.98; P = 0.03) significantly decreased the risk of DNR versus control. There was no significant decrease in the risk of DNR with regional anesthesia (RA) versus general anesthesia (GA) (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.63-1.26) or bispectral index (BIS) monitoring (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.60-1.04) versus the control groups. Evidence regarding the effects of interventions on P-NCD is limited. Although all included trials were at low risk of bias, the quality of meta-analysis pooled estimates was low.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of RCTs showed that dexmedetomidine and TIVA decrease the risk of DNR in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery by 41% and 20%, respectively, versus control. Further RCTs of adequate power and methodology on the effects of interventions on DNR and P-NCD are warranted.

预防老年手术患者神经认知延迟恢复和术后神经认知障碍的围手术期方法:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:神经认知恢复延迟(DNR)和术后神经认知障碍(P-NCD)是影响老年患者的常见术后并发症。本综述评估了预防老年非心脏手术患者 DNR 和 P-NCD 的围手术期方法:我们在数据库中搜索了从开始到 2022 年 6 月的相关文章,并在 2023 年 5 月进行了更新(PROSPERO ID CRD42022359289)。纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)对 DNR 和/或 P-NCD 进行了干预:我们纳入了 39 项涉及麻醉(25 项 RCT,7422 名患者)以及其他药物和非药物方法(14 项 RCT,2210 名患者)的 RCT。17项研究四种干预措施的试验被纳入了DNR的荟萃分析。与对照组相比,围术期右美托咪定(相对风险 [RR]:0.59,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.35-0.97;P = 0.04)和基于异丙酚的全静脉麻醉 (TIVA)(RR:0.81,95% CI:0.66-0.98;P = 0.03)显著降低了 DNR 风险。区域麻醉(RA)与全身麻醉(GA)(RR:0.89,95% CI:0.63-1.26)或双频谱指数(BIS)监测(RR:0.79,95% CI:0.60-1.04)与对照组相比,DNR 风险没有明显降低。有关干预措施对 P-NCD 影响的证据有限。尽管所有纳入的试验偏倚风险都很低,但荟萃分析的汇总估计值质量不高:我们对研究性临床试验进行的荟萃分析表明,右美托咪定和 TIVA 与对照组相比,可将接受非心脏手术的老年患者的 DNR 风险分别降低 41% 和 20%。有必要就干预措施对DNR和P-NCD的影响进一步开展具有足够功率和方法的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信