{"title":"Differential risk of autoimmune disorders in non-traumatic osteonecrosis: clue to pathogenesis.","authors":"Edward Y Cheng, Alireza Mirzaei","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2475982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-traumatic osteonecrosis is a frequent complication in patients with autoimmune disorders, though its prevalence varies markedly depending upon the type of disorder. Understanding the causes of this difference can help uncover the underlying pathophysiology of osteonecrosis and guide the development of effective preventive and therapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this perspective study, we reviewed available databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, to explore why the risk of osteonecrosis varies among different autoimmune disorders. Is this variation primarily due to the disease's pathophysiology, the use of medications such as corticosteroids, or a combination of both? If both factors are involved, what is the extent of each contribution in this context?</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Non-traumatic osteonecrosis is often induced by an interaction between disease pathophysiology and corticosteroid use. In patients with different autoimmune disorders but an identical history of corticosteroid use, the risk of osteonecrosis is influenced by how the underlying pathophysiology compromises bone health. In autoimmune disorders with multiple adverse effects on bone, such as SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), there is a much higher risk of osteonecrosis compared to disorders with minimal impact on bone health, such as celiac disease and MS (multiple sclerosis).</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"413-424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2475982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Non-traumatic osteonecrosis is a frequent complication in patients with autoimmune disorders, though its prevalence varies markedly depending upon the type of disorder. Understanding the causes of this difference can help uncover the underlying pathophysiology of osteonecrosis and guide the development of effective preventive and therapeutic strategies.
Areas covered: In this perspective study, we reviewed available databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, to explore why the risk of osteonecrosis varies among different autoimmune disorders. Is this variation primarily due to the disease's pathophysiology, the use of medications such as corticosteroids, or a combination of both? If both factors are involved, what is the extent of each contribution in this context?
Expert opinion: Non-traumatic osteonecrosis is often induced by an interaction between disease pathophysiology and corticosteroid use. In patients with different autoimmune disorders but an identical history of corticosteroid use, the risk of osteonecrosis is influenced by how the underlying pathophysiology compromises bone health. In autoimmune disorders with multiple adverse effects on bone, such as SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), there is a much higher risk of osteonecrosis compared to disorders with minimal impact on bone health, such as celiac disease and MS (multiple sclerosis).
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.