Interventions on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review of Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Fusta Azupogo, Nadia Koyratty, Taryn J Smith, Guy-Marino Hinnouho, Manisha Tharaney, Lilia Bliznashka, Dorcas A Amunga, Imelda Angeles-Agdeppa, Eva Goyena, Frederick Grant, Joyce Kinabo, Irene Medeme Mitchodigni, Renuka Silva, Hasara Sitisekara, Deanna K Olney, Sonja Y Hess
{"title":"Interventions on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review of Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.","authors":"Fusta Azupogo, Nadia Koyratty, Taryn J Smith, Guy-Marino Hinnouho, Manisha Tharaney, Lilia Bliznashka, Dorcas A Amunga, Imelda Angeles-Agdeppa, Eva Goyena, Frederick Grant, Joyce Kinabo, Irene Medeme Mitchodigni, Renuka Silva, Hasara Sitisekara, Deanna K Olney, Sonja Y Hess","doi":"10.1177/03795721251314141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAdequate fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake is important for health, yet populations globally are failing to meet recommendations.ObjectiveA scoping review to summarize available evidence of evaluations of interventions to increase F&V intake globally, focusing on target populations, intervention strategies, research methods, and summarizing their evaluated impacts.MethodsWe searched PubMed and Web of Science in February 2023 for intervention studies in which dietary intake of fruit and/or vegetables were documented. Eligible studies included all age groups, excluding those targeting populations with specific disease-related conditions, such as cancer patients/survivors. Only articles published in English since 2012 were included in the review.ResultsWe identified 6338 articles, with 226 meeting inclusion criteria, comprising 223 unique studies and 284 intervention comparisons. Most comparisons occurred in high-income countries (<i>n</i> = 192) compared to low- and middle-income countries (<i>n</i> = 92). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 37.3%) and cluster RCTs (52.5%) were predominant. Interventions primarily targeted adults (31.7%), school-aged children (18.0%), children under-five (14.4%), and adolescents (13.7%), lasting an average of 24 weeks (range: 2 weeks to 20 years). Food-frequency questionnaires (59.2%) and 24-h recalls (26.8%) were the most used dietary assessment method. Health and nutrition education (75.9%) was the most common intervention, utilizing interpersonal communication, mass media, and information-communication technology, often in combinations. Positive impacts on fruit (43.9%), vegetable (40.2%), and combined F&V intake (53.0%) were observed in nearly half the intervention comparisons.ConclusionsThese findings highlight the predominance of health and nutrition education interventions, predominantly in high-income countries, showing mixed success in improving F&V intake, emphasizing the need for context-specific strategies and standardized methodologies to design sustainable, cost-effective interventions for better diet quality and health outcomes. Plain language titleA literature review assessing what we know and do not know about efforts to improve fruit and vegetable intake across the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3795721251314141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721251314141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAdequate fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake is important for health, yet populations globally are failing to meet recommendations.ObjectiveA scoping review to summarize available evidence of evaluations of interventions to increase F&V intake globally, focusing on target populations, intervention strategies, research methods, and summarizing their evaluated impacts.MethodsWe searched PubMed and Web of Science in February 2023 for intervention studies in which dietary intake of fruit and/or vegetables were documented. Eligible studies included all age groups, excluding those targeting populations with specific disease-related conditions, such as cancer patients/survivors. Only articles published in English since 2012 were included in the review.ResultsWe identified 6338 articles, with 226 meeting inclusion criteria, comprising 223 unique studies and 284 intervention comparisons. Most comparisons occurred in high-income countries (n = 192) compared to low- and middle-income countries (n = 92). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 37.3%) and cluster RCTs (52.5%) were predominant. Interventions primarily targeted adults (31.7%), school-aged children (18.0%), children under-five (14.4%), and adolescents (13.7%), lasting an average of 24 weeks (range: 2 weeks to 20 years). Food-frequency questionnaires (59.2%) and 24-h recalls (26.8%) were the most used dietary assessment method. Health and nutrition education (75.9%) was the most common intervention, utilizing interpersonal communication, mass media, and information-communication technology, often in combinations. Positive impacts on fruit (43.9%), vegetable (40.2%), and combined F&V intake (53.0%) were observed in nearly half the intervention comparisons.ConclusionsThese findings highlight the predominance of health and nutrition education interventions, predominantly in high-income countries, showing mixed success in improving F&V intake, emphasizing the need for context-specific strategies and standardized methodologies to design sustainable, cost-effective interventions for better diet quality and health outcomes. Plain language titleA literature review assessing what we know and do not know about efforts to improve fruit and vegetable intake across the world.

对低收入、中等收入和高收入国家水果和蔬菜摄入的干预措施:对证据和知识差距的范围审查。
背景:充足的水果和蔬菜(F&V)摄入量对健康很重要,但全球人口未能达到建议摄入量。目的:从目标人群、干预策略、研究方法等方面综述全球范围内增加食品和蔬菜摄入干预措施评估的现有证据,并总结其评估效果。方法:我们于2023年2月检索了PubMed和Web of Science中记录了水果和/或蔬菜饮食摄入的干预研究。符合条件的研究包括所有年龄组,不包括那些针对具有特定疾病相关病症的人群,如癌症患者/幸存者。本综述只收录了2012年以来发表的英文文章。结果:我们确定了6338篇文章,其中226篇符合纳入标准,包括223项独特研究和284项干预比较。大多数比较发生在高收入国家(n = 192)与中低收入国家(n = 92)之间。随机对照试验;37.3%)和集群rct(52.5%)占主导地位。干预措施主要针对成人(31.7%)、学龄儿童(18.0%)、五岁以下儿童(14.4%)和青少年(13.7%),平均持续24周(范围:2周到20年)。食物频率问卷调查(59.2%)和24小时召回(26.8%)是最常用的膳食评估方法。健康和营养教育(75.9%)是最常见的干预措施,利用人际沟通、大众媒体和信息通信技术,通常结合使用。在近一半的干预比较中,水果(43.9%)、蔬菜(40.2%)和食物和蔬菜混合摄入(53.0%)均有积极影响。结论:这些发现突出了健康和营养教育干预措施的优势,主要在高收入国家,在改善饮食和营养摄入方面显示出好坏参半的成功,强调需要针对具体情况制定战略和标准化方法,以设计可持续的、具有成本效益的干预措施,以改善饮食质量和健康结果。通俗易懂的标题:一篇文献综述,评估我们对世界各地提高水果和蔬菜摄入量的努力所知道和不知道的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信