Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Preventing Rebleeding of Esophageal Varices in Patients with Portal Cavernous Transformation.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jin-Wei Chen, Peng-Fei Chen, Jing Li, Xu-Hua Duan, Jian-Zhuang Ren, Wen-Guang Zhang
{"title":"Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Preventing Rebleeding of Esophageal Varices in Patients with Portal Cavernous Transformation.","authors":"Jin-Wei Chen, Peng-Fei Chen, Jing Li, Xu-Hua Duan, Jian-Zhuang Ren, Wen-Guang Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-08955-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding and/or refractory ascites in patients with cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) is associated with a high fatality rate. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) provides a treatment option for preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding and/or refractory ascites. This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of TIPS for the patients involved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 41 consecutive patients with CTPV who underwent TIPS at our institution from January 2015 to May 2019 were reviewed. Among the 41 patients, 36 patients had variceal rebleeding only, and 5 patients exhibited both variceal rebleeding and refractory ascites. Ten of these patients underwent TIPS via a transjugular pathway alone; a combined transjugular/transhepatic pathway and a combined transjugular/transsplenic pathway were adopted for 21 and 3 patients, respectively; and the remaining 7 patients failed TIPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TIPS succeeded in 34 of 41 (82.9%) patients. Four of 34 patients with CTPV were successfully cured with a thick collateral caval stent shunt operation. After TIPS, the mean portosystemic pressure gradient declined from 24.60 ± 6.15 mmHg to 15.89 ± 4.08 mmHg (P < 0.01). The occurrence rate of variceal rebleeding in the TIPS success group was lower than that in the TIPS failure group (11.8% vs 42.9%, P < 0.05). The occurrence rate of recurrent ascites in the TIPS failure group was greater than that in the TIPS success group (75% vs 15.8%, P < 0.05). TIPS patency was 76.5% (26 of 34 patients). During the follow-up time (median 12.64 months), the rate of hepatic encephalopathy was 5.9%, and the survival rate was 85.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TIPS is an effective and safe alternative therapy for preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding and/or refractory ascites in patients who exhibit CTPV, and these findings may be beneficial to clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-08955-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding and/or refractory ascites in patients with cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) is associated with a high fatality rate. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) provides a treatment option for preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding and/or refractory ascites. This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of TIPS for the patients involved.

Methods: The records of 41 consecutive patients with CTPV who underwent TIPS at our institution from January 2015 to May 2019 were reviewed. Among the 41 patients, 36 patients had variceal rebleeding only, and 5 patients exhibited both variceal rebleeding and refractory ascites. Ten of these patients underwent TIPS via a transjugular pathway alone; a combined transjugular/transhepatic pathway and a combined transjugular/transsplenic pathway were adopted for 21 and 3 patients, respectively; and the remaining 7 patients failed TIPS.

Results: TIPS succeeded in 34 of 41 (82.9%) patients. Four of 34 patients with CTPV were successfully cured with a thick collateral caval stent shunt operation. After TIPS, the mean portosystemic pressure gradient declined from 24.60 ± 6.15 mmHg to 15.89 ± 4.08 mmHg (P < 0.01). The occurrence rate of variceal rebleeding in the TIPS success group was lower than that in the TIPS failure group (11.8% vs 42.9%, P < 0.05). The occurrence rate of recurrent ascites in the TIPS failure group was greater than that in the TIPS success group (75% vs 15.8%, P < 0.05). TIPS patency was 76.5% (26 of 34 patients). During the follow-up time (median 12.64 months), the rate of hepatic encephalopathy was 5.9%, and the survival rate was 85.3%.

Conclusions: TIPS is an effective and safe alternative therapy for preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding and/or refractory ascites in patients who exhibit CTPV, and these findings may be beneficial to clinical research.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信