Xuejun Victor Peng, Georgeanna Klingensmith, Daniel S Hsia, Yunlong Xie, Richard Czerniak, William V Tamborlane, Amy S Shah
{"title":"A Randomized Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin in Pediatric Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Xuejun Victor Peng, Georgeanna Klingensmith, Daniel S Hsia, Yunlong Xie, Richard Czerniak, William V Tamborlane, Amy S Shah","doi":"10.1007/s13300-025-01700-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an unmet need for pharmacological therapies for children with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We assessed the efficacy and safety of an oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, alogliptin, 25 mg once daily (QD), as a potential treatment for pediatric patients with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, 52-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in children and adolescents (10-17 years old) with T2DM. Participants had glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% at baseline (≥ 6.5% to < 11% without treatment or on metformin alone; ≥ 7.0% to < 11% on insulin alone or in combination with metformin). Where required, participants underwent prerandomization stabilization of their background metformin and/or insulin therapy. All received diabetes education and home glucose-monitoring training (during screening, prerandomization stabilization, and specified visits through week 26). Participants were then stratified based on previous antihyperglycemic therapy for 12 weeks before screening into schedule A (antihyperglycemic treatment-naïve) or B (metformin and/or insulin). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c levels from baseline at week 26. Safety was assessed as a secondary endpoint at week 52.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 152 participants (median age, 14 years; 68.9% female) were randomized (1:1) to receive either alogliptin (n = 75) or placebo (n = 77). The majority were white (58.3%), had a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (60.3%), and had received previous antihyperglycemic therapy (82.1%). The difference in HbA1c levels from baseline to week 26 between the alogliptin and placebo groups (least squares mean change [95% confidence interval]) was 0.10 (- 0.63, 0.83; p = 0.78). There was no difference in efficacy endpoints between alogliptin and placebo across both subgroups. No new safety concerns were observed with alogliptin treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alogliptin 25 mg QD did not significantly improve glycemic control versus placebo in pediatric patients with T2DM. Alogliptin treatment was safe and well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were observed in this study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02856113; EudraCT: 2015-000208-25.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01700-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: There is an unmet need for pharmacological therapies for children with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We assessed the efficacy and safety of an oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, alogliptin, 25 mg once daily (QD), as a potential treatment for pediatric patients with T2DM.
Methods: This phase 3, 52-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in children and adolescents (10-17 years old) with T2DM. Participants had glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% at baseline (≥ 6.5% to < 11% without treatment or on metformin alone; ≥ 7.0% to < 11% on insulin alone or in combination with metformin). Where required, participants underwent prerandomization stabilization of their background metformin and/or insulin therapy. All received diabetes education and home glucose-monitoring training (during screening, prerandomization stabilization, and specified visits through week 26). Participants were then stratified based on previous antihyperglycemic therapy for 12 weeks before screening into schedule A (antihyperglycemic treatment-naïve) or B (metformin and/or insulin). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c levels from baseline at week 26. Safety was assessed as a secondary endpoint at week 52.
Results: Overall, 152 participants (median age, 14 years; 68.9% female) were randomized (1:1) to receive either alogliptin (n = 75) or placebo (n = 77). The majority were white (58.3%), had a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m2 (60.3%), and had received previous antihyperglycemic therapy (82.1%). The difference in HbA1c levels from baseline to week 26 between the alogliptin and placebo groups (least squares mean change [95% confidence interval]) was 0.10 (- 0.63, 0.83; p = 0.78). There was no difference in efficacy endpoints between alogliptin and placebo across both subgroups. No new safety concerns were observed with alogliptin treatment.
Conclusion: Alogliptin 25 mg QD did not significantly improve glycemic control versus placebo in pediatric patients with T2DM. Alogliptin treatment was safe and well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were observed in this study.
期刊介绍：
Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
