Clinical Performance of Spo2/Fio2 and Pao2/Fio2 Ratio in Mechanically Ventilated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Study.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Silvia Coppola, Tommaso Pozzi, Giulia Catozzi, Alessandro Monte, Enrico Frascati, Davide Chiumello
{"title":"Clinical Performance of Spo2/Fio2 and Pao2/Fio2 Ratio in Mechanically Ventilated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Silvia Coppola, Tommaso Pozzi, Giulia Catozzi, Alessandro Monte, Enrico Frascati, Davide Chiumello","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aims to evaluate the severity classification of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated patients according to peripheral oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (Spo2)/Fio2 ratio compared with Pao2/Fio2 ratio and the relationship between Spo2/Fio2 ratio and venous admixture.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medical-surgical ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A cohort of 258 mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS already enrolled in previous studies.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Gas exchange, Spo2, and respiratory mechanics were measured on ICU admission and during the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial. Radiological data from CTs were used to compute lung recruitability and to assess different lung compartments. A nonlinear association was found between Spo2/Fio2 and Pao2/Fio2. Considering the possible confounding factors of the pulse oximeter on the relationship between Spo2/Fio2 and Pao2/Fio2 ratio, arterial pH, and Paco2 had no effect. Spo2/Fio2 and Pao2/Fio2 ratio demonstrated a moderate agreement in classifying ARDS severity (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.63). Between the correspondent classes according to Spo2/Fio2 vs. Pao2/Fio2 ratio-derived severity classifications, there was no difference in terms of respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, lung radiological characteristics and mortality in ICU, and within two levels of PEEP. A Spo2/Fio2 ratio less than 235 was able to detect 89% of patients with a venous admixture greater than 20%, similarly to a Pao2/Fio2 ratio less than 200.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spo2/Fio2 ratio can detect oxygenation impairment and classify ARDS severity similarly to Pao2/Fio2 ratio in a more rapid and handy way, even during a PEEP trial. However, our results may not be applicable to different patient populations; in fact, the pulse oximeter is merely a monitoring device and the information should be personalized by the physician on the patient's characteristics and conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aims to evaluate the severity classification of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated patients according to peripheral oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (Spo2)/Fio2 ratio compared with Pao2/Fio2 ratio and the relationship between Spo2/Fio2 ratio and venous admixture.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: Medical-surgical ICU.

Patients: A cohort of 258 mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS already enrolled in previous studies.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Gas exchange, Spo2, and respiratory mechanics were measured on ICU admission and during the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial. Radiological data from CTs were used to compute lung recruitability and to assess different lung compartments. A nonlinear association was found between Spo2/Fio2 and Pao2/Fio2. Considering the possible confounding factors of the pulse oximeter on the relationship between Spo2/Fio2 and Pao2/Fio2 ratio, arterial pH, and Paco2 had no effect. Spo2/Fio2 and Pao2/Fio2 ratio demonstrated a moderate agreement in classifying ARDS severity (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.63). Between the correspondent classes according to Spo2/Fio2 vs. Pao2/Fio2 ratio-derived severity classifications, there was no difference in terms of respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, lung radiological characteristics and mortality in ICU, and within two levels of PEEP. A Spo2/Fio2 ratio less than 235 was able to detect 89% of patients with a venous admixture greater than 20%, similarly to a Pao2/Fio2 ratio less than 200.

Conclusions: Spo2/Fio2 ratio can detect oxygenation impairment and classify ARDS severity similarly to Pao2/Fio2 ratio in a more rapid and handy way, even during a PEEP trial. However, our results may not be applicable to different patient populations; in fact, the pulse oximeter is merely a monitoring device and the information should be personalized by the physician on the patient's characteristics and conditions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信