PATTERNS OF CHANGE IN EMOTIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL WELL-BEING FOLLOWING BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yumeng Ren, Joanna Maselko, Xianming Tan, Andrew F Olshan, Angela M Stover, Antonia V Bennett, Marc A Emerson, Melissa A Troester
{"title":"PATTERNS OF CHANGE IN EMOTIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL WELL-BEING FOLLOWING BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS.","authors":"Yumeng Ren, Joanna Maselko, Xianming Tan, Andrew F Olshan, Angela M Stover, Antonia V Bennett, Marc A Emerson, Melissa A Troester","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding emotional and functional well-being (EWB and FWB) change in breast cancer (BC) survivors can facilitate targeted support for unmet needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 2,767 women with BC in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase 3, we assessed EWB and FWB with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) instrument at 5 (baseline), 25, and 84 months post-diagnosis. We identified well-being trajectories using latent class growth analysis, and relative frequency differences (RFDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for associations between trajectory group membership and demographic or clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five trajectory groups were identified for both EWB and FWB. Most participants (~70%) were classified into \"good well-being\" (\"stable high\" or \"stable medium\"). A small percentage (~10%) fell into \"very low baseline\" or \"early decrease\", and the rest were \"stable low\" (~20%). Overall, younger vs. older age was associated with \"stable low\" EWB (25.4% vs. 19.3%; relative frequency difference [RFD] 6.1% [95% CI: 3.0%-9.2%]). Black participants more frequently had \"stable low\" FWB (24.2% vs. 16.6%; RFD 7.6% [95% CI: 4.6%-10.6%]). BC recurrence was strongly associated with \"stable low\" EWB (28.7% vs. 21.3%; RFD 7.3% [95% CI: 2.3%-12.3%]) and FWB (28.7% vs. 19.2%; RFD 8.6% [95% CI: 3.7%-13.5%]). Being unmarried, lower income, having non-private insurance, advanced stage, mastectomy vs. breast conservation surgery, and chemotherapy were also predictors of poor well-being trajectories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Demographics and clinical features are associated with sustained poor well-being after BC.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Improvements in long-term well-being may warrant targeted support.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding emotional and functional well-being (EWB and FWB) change in breast cancer (BC) survivors can facilitate targeted support for unmet needs.

Methods: Among 2,767 women with BC in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase 3, we assessed EWB and FWB with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) instrument at 5 (baseline), 25, and 84 months post-diagnosis. We identified well-being trajectories using latent class growth analysis, and relative frequency differences (RFDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for associations between trajectory group membership and demographic or clinical characteristics.

Results: Five trajectory groups were identified for both EWB and FWB. Most participants (~70%) were classified into "good well-being" ("stable high" or "stable medium"). A small percentage (~10%) fell into "very low baseline" or "early decrease", and the rest were "stable low" (~20%). Overall, younger vs. older age was associated with "stable low" EWB (25.4% vs. 19.3%; relative frequency difference [RFD] 6.1% [95% CI: 3.0%-9.2%]). Black participants more frequently had "stable low" FWB (24.2% vs. 16.6%; RFD 7.6% [95% CI: 4.6%-10.6%]). BC recurrence was strongly associated with "stable low" EWB (28.7% vs. 21.3%; RFD 7.3% [95% CI: 2.3%-12.3%]) and FWB (28.7% vs. 19.2%; RFD 8.6% [95% CI: 3.7%-13.5%]). Being unmarried, lower income, having non-private insurance, advanced stage, mastectomy vs. breast conservation surgery, and chemotherapy were also predictors of poor well-being trajectories.

Conclusions: Demographics and clinical features are associated with sustained poor well-being after BC.

Impact: Improvements in long-term well-being may warrant targeted support.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信