More Intensive Versus Conservative Blood Pressure Lowering after Endovascular Therapy in Stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.8 4区 医学
Ahmed NajiMansoor, Vatsalya Choudhary, Zain MohammadNasser, Muskan Jain, Dhruvikumari DayanandSharma, Mateo JaramilloVillegas, Sujaritha Janarthanam, Muhammad Ayyan, Simran RavindraNimal, Huzaifa AhmadCheema, Muhammad Ehsan, Muhammad AemazUrRehman, Abdulqadir Nashwan, Sourbha S Dani
{"title":"More Intensive Versus Conservative Blood Pressure Lowering after Endovascular Therapy in Stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Ahmed NajiMansoor, Vatsalya Choudhary, Zain MohammadNasser, Muskan Jain, Dhruvikumari DayanandSharma, Mateo JaramilloVillegas, Sujaritha Janarthanam, Muhammad Ayyan, Simran RavindraNimal, Huzaifa AhmadCheema, Muhammad Ehsan, Muhammad AemazUrRehman, Abdulqadir Nashwan, Sourbha S Dani","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2025.2475314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe optimum systolic blood pressure after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is uncertain. We aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of more intensive blood pressure management as compared to less intensive blood pressure management.MethodsWe searched various electronic databases including Embase, MEDLINE (via PubMed), and CENTRAL to retrieve relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the clinical effects of more intensive blood pressure management after endovascular thrombectomy as compared to the less intensive management. We assessed the risk of bias using the revised Cochrane \"Risk of bias\" tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0), calculated odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes.ResultsOur meta-analysis included 4 RCTs with a total of 1560 patients. According to our analysis, more intensive blood pressure management (<140 mmHg) was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the number of patients showing functional independence (modified Rankin scale mRS score = 0-2) at 90 days (OR 0.69; CI = 0.51-0.94; I<sup>2</sup> = 44%). Regarding 90-day mortality, our pooled results from three RCTs showed no statistically significant difference between the more intensive blood pressure management group and the less intensive blood pressure management group (140-180 mmHg) (OR 1.21; CI = 0.89-1.65; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (OR 1.09; CI = 0.85-1.39; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) (OR 1.11; CI = 0.75-1.65; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).ConclusionAccording to our meta-analysis, the intensive blood pressure lowering group was associated with a lower number of patients showing functional independence at 90 days We found no benefit of the intensive lowering of blood pressure on mortality rates and incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage as compared to the conservative BP management. Future large-scale trials should focus on other interventions to improve prognosis in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2025.2475314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe optimum systolic blood pressure after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is uncertain. We aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of more intensive blood pressure management as compared to less intensive blood pressure management.MethodsWe searched various electronic databases including Embase, MEDLINE (via PubMed), and CENTRAL to retrieve relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the clinical effects of more intensive blood pressure management after endovascular thrombectomy as compared to the less intensive management. We assessed the risk of bias using the revised Cochrane "Risk of bias" tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0), calculated odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes.ResultsOur meta-analysis included 4 RCTs with a total of 1560 patients. According to our analysis, more intensive blood pressure management (<140 mmHg) was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the number of patients showing functional independence (modified Rankin scale mRS score = 0-2) at 90 days (OR 0.69; CI = 0.51-0.94; I2 = 44%). Regarding 90-day mortality, our pooled results from three RCTs showed no statistically significant difference between the more intensive blood pressure management group and the less intensive blood pressure management group (140-180 mmHg) (OR 1.21; CI = 0.89-1.65; I2 = 0%). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (OR 1.09; CI = 0.85-1.39; I2 = 0%) and the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) (OR 1.11; CI = 0.75-1.65; I2 = 0%).ConclusionAccording to our meta-analysis, the intensive blood pressure lowering group was associated with a lower number of patients showing functional independence at 90 days We found no benefit of the intensive lowering of blood pressure on mortality rates and incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage as compared to the conservative BP management. Future large-scale trials should focus on other interventions to improve prognosis in these patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信