The link between adherence to antihypertensive medications and mortality rates in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xuemei Peng, Lihong Wan, Benkai Yu, Jianhui Zhang
{"title":"The link between adherence to antihypertensive medications and mortality rates in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.","authors":"Xuemei Peng, Lihong Wan, Benkai Yu, Jianhui Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04538-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension (HTN) significantly contributes to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis specifically investigates how different levels of adherence to antihypertensive therapy (AHT) affect mortality rates in HTN patients. By synthesizing cohort studies, it aims to enhance understanding and inform clinical practices to improve outcomes in hypertensive populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our meta-analysis employed a comprehensive search strategy using keywords related to hypertension, medical adherence, and mortality across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to July 2024. The eligibility criteria focused on cohort studies linking AHT adherence to mortality. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias (ROB). Quantitative analyses involved hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI), with an 80% adherence threshold. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted using STATA-17 to explore various outcome factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From initial 1,999 studies 12 cohort studies included in our analysis. All included studies had low ROB score. A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 2,198,311 patient with HTN revealed that poor adherence to treatment significantly increased all-cause mortality (HR: 1.32 [1.14, 1.51], p < 0.001) with high heterogeneity (I²: 98.73%). Additionally, an analysis of four studies with 1,695,872 patients indicated that low adherence was linked to elevated cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.61 [1.43, 1.78], p < 0.001), showing moderate heterogeneity (I²: 49.51%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that poor adherence to AHT significantly increases overall and cardiovascular mortality risk, underscoring the need for improved compliance strategies. Limitations like inconsistent definitions, observational biases, and varying follow-up durations necessitate further research to validate these findings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04538-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension (HTN) significantly contributes to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis specifically investigates how different levels of adherence to antihypertensive therapy (AHT) affect mortality rates in HTN patients. By synthesizing cohort studies, it aims to enhance understanding and inform clinical practices to improve outcomes in hypertensive populations.

Methods: Our meta-analysis employed a comprehensive search strategy using keywords related to hypertension, medical adherence, and mortality across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to July 2024. The eligibility criteria focused on cohort studies linking AHT adherence to mortality. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias (ROB). Quantitative analyses involved hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI), with an 80% adherence threshold. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted using STATA-17 to explore various outcome factors.

Results: From initial 1,999 studies 12 cohort studies included in our analysis. All included studies had low ROB score. A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 2,198,311 patient with HTN revealed that poor adherence to treatment significantly increased all-cause mortality (HR: 1.32 [1.14, 1.51], p < 0.001) with high heterogeneity (I²: 98.73%). Additionally, an analysis of four studies with 1,695,872 patients indicated that low adherence was linked to elevated cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.61 [1.43, 1.78], p < 0.001), showing moderate heterogeneity (I²: 49.51%).

Conclusions: The study found that poor adherence to AHT significantly increases overall and cardiovascular mortality risk, underscoring the need for improved compliance strategies. Limitations like inconsistent definitions, observational biases, and varying follow-up durations necessitate further research to validate these findings.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信