A Formula for Love: Partner Merit and Appreciation Beget Actor Significance.

IF 16.6 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Arie W Kruglanski, Molly Ellenberg, Huixian Yu, Edward P Lemay, Sophia Moskalenko, Ewa Szumowska, Erica Molinario, Antonio Pierro, Federico Contu
{"title":"A Formula for Love: Partner Merit and Appreciation Beget Actor Significance.","authors":"Arie W Kruglanski, Molly Ellenberg, Huixian Yu, Edward P Lemay, Sophia Moskalenko, Ewa Szumowska, Erica Molinario, Antonio Pierro, Federico Contu","doi":"10.1017/S0140525X25000020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We offer a novel motivational account of romantic love, which portrays it as a means to the end of feeling significant and worthy. According to the model, falling in love with a partner depends on the actor's perceptions that (1) the partner possesses meritorious characteristics, and (2) that they appreciate the actor and view them as significant. We assume that these two factors multiplicatively combine with the magnitude of actor's quest for significance to determine the likelihood of actor becoming enamored with partner. The multiplicative model has two major implications: 1. If any one of the partner's <i>merit</i>, <i>appreciation</i>, or actor's <i>significance quest</i> factors falls below its respective threshold of acceptability (such that it is subjectively non-existent), the likelihood of falling in love will be negligible. 2. Above their acceptability thresholds, levels of (partner's) <i>merit</i>, <i>appreciation</i> and (actor's) <i>significance quest</i> factors compensate for one another. A partner's lower standing on merit or appreciation is compensated in its impact on falling in love by the partner's higher standing on the remaining dimension. Furthermore, lower levels of either or both of these factors are compensated for by the actor's higher level of significance quest.Our model affords a broad account of diverse love phenomena, allows the derivation of several specific hypotheses supported by prior close-relations research as well as new data, and it offers novel avenues for further research on classic issues in romantic love. The discussion considers our model's unique implications and examines its relation to other theories of love.</p>","PeriodicalId":8698,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-68"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25000020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We offer a novel motivational account of romantic love, which portrays it as a means to the end of feeling significant and worthy. According to the model, falling in love with a partner depends on the actor's perceptions that (1) the partner possesses meritorious characteristics, and (2) that they appreciate the actor and view them as significant. We assume that these two factors multiplicatively combine with the magnitude of actor's quest for significance to determine the likelihood of actor becoming enamored with partner. The multiplicative model has two major implications: 1. If any one of the partner's merit, appreciation, or actor's significance quest factors falls below its respective threshold of acceptability (such that it is subjectively non-existent), the likelihood of falling in love will be negligible. 2. Above their acceptability thresholds, levels of (partner's) merit, appreciation and (actor's) significance quest factors compensate for one another. A partner's lower standing on merit or appreciation is compensated in its impact on falling in love by the partner's higher standing on the remaining dimension. Furthermore, lower levels of either or both of these factors are compensated for by the actor's higher level of significance quest.Our model affords a broad account of diverse love phenomena, allows the derivation of several specific hypotheses supported by prior close-relations research as well as new data, and it offers novel avenues for further research on classic issues in romantic love. The discussion considers our model's unique implications and examines its relation to other theories of love.

爱的公式:伴侣的优点和欣赏产生演员的意义。
我们为浪漫爱情提供了一种新颖的动机描述,它将其描绘为一种达到感觉重要和有价值的目的的手段。根据该模型,爱上一个伴侣取决于行为人的感知(1)伴侣具有值得称道的特征,以及(2)他们欣赏行为人并认为他们很重要。我们假设这两个因素与演员追求意义的程度相乘结合,以确定演员迷恋伴侣的可能性。乘法模型有两个主要含义:1。如果伴侣的优点、欣赏或演员的重要性追求因素中的任何一个低于其各自的可接受阈值(即主观上不存在),那么坠入爱河的可能性将可以忽略不计。2. 在他们的可接受阈值之上,(伴侣的)优点、欣赏和(演员的)重要性追求因素的水平相互补偿。一个伴侣在优点或欣赏方面的地位较低,在其对坠入爱河的影响中,被伴侣在其余维度上的较高地位所补偿。此外,这些因素中的任何一个或两个的较低水平被行为人更高水平的重要性追求所补偿。我们的模型提供了对各种爱情现象的广泛解释,允许推导出由先前的亲密关系研究和新数据支持的几个特定假设,并为进一步研究浪漫爱情中的经典问题提供了新的途径。讨论考虑了我们的模型的独特含义,并考察了它与其他爱情理论的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
353
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信