State of infection prevention and control in Austrian hospitals: data from 81 hospitals completing the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF).

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ferenc Darius Rüther, Andrea Grisold, Agnes Wechsler-Fördös, Alexander Gropmann, Michael Behnke, Sonja Hansen, Christine Geffers, Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
{"title":"State of infection prevention and control in Austrian hospitals: data from 81 hospitals completing the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF).","authors":"Ferenc Darius Rüther, Andrea Grisold, Agnes Wechsler-Fördös, Alexander Gropmann, Michael Behnke, Sonja Hansen, Christine Geffers, Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01532-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) can be used for systematically evaluating infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in healthcare facilities. In 2018, a survey among Austrian hospitals using the IPCAF revealed an overall high level of IPC implementation. Here, we report the results of a second survey in Austrian hospitals with the IPCAF, to once again evaluate the state of IPC implementation and investigate potential developments since 2018.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 Austrian acute care hospitals participating in the German surveillance network \"KISS\" were invited to complete a translated online version of the IPCAF between October 2023 and January 2024. The IPCAF functions like a questionnaire, where each response is assigned a specific point value, enabling the calculation of an overall IPC score. Based on this score, hospitals were categorized into four distinct IPC levels: inadequate, basic, intermediate, and advanced. The aggregated scores were then calculated and compared with the results from 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete datasets from 81 hospitals were received and analyzed. The median overall IPCAF score was 645 (interquartile range: 598-685), with 59 hospitals (72.9%) categorized as advanced, and 21 hospitals (25.9%) as intermediate. One hospital (1.2%) fell into the basic category. Questions pertaining to IPC education and training as well as the application of multimodal IPC strategies showed the lowest scores. Compared to 2018, the current median score of 645 was slightly higher (median score 2018: 620; data from 65 hospitals) and the proportion of hospitals with a full-time IPC professional per 250 beds increased markedly by 37 percentage points. However, the most pronounced decrease (median score - 5) was observed for questions on the WHO core component of IPC education and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPC standards in Austria show an overall increasing trend, especially in terms of IPC staffing. However, areas for improvement remain, and hospitals should make efforts to strengthen IPC education and training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01532-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) can be used for systematically evaluating infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in healthcare facilities. In 2018, a survey among Austrian hospitals using the IPCAF revealed an overall high level of IPC implementation. Here, we report the results of a second survey in Austrian hospitals with the IPCAF, to once again evaluate the state of IPC implementation and investigate potential developments since 2018.

Methods: A total of 139 Austrian acute care hospitals participating in the German surveillance network "KISS" were invited to complete a translated online version of the IPCAF between October 2023 and January 2024. The IPCAF functions like a questionnaire, where each response is assigned a specific point value, enabling the calculation of an overall IPC score. Based on this score, hospitals were categorized into four distinct IPC levels: inadequate, basic, intermediate, and advanced. The aggregated scores were then calculated and compared with the results from 2018.

Results: Complete datasets from 81 hospitals were received and analyzed. The median overall IPCAF score was 645 (interquartile range: 598-685), with 59 hospitals (72.9%) categorized as advanced, and 21 hospitals (25.9%) as intermediate. One hospital (1.2%) fell into the basic category. Questions pertaining to IPC education and training as well as the application of multimodal IPC strategies showed the lowest scores. Compared to 2018, the current median score of 645 was slightly higher (median score 2018: 620; data from 65 hospitals) and the proportion of hospitals with a full-time IPC professional per 250 beds increased markedly by 37 percentage points. However, the most pronounced decrease (median score - 5) was observed for questions on the WHO core component of IPC education and training.

Conclusions: IPC standards in Austria show an overall increasing trend, especially in terms of IPC staffing. However, areas for improvement remain, and hospitals should make efforts to strengthen IPC education and training programs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

奥地利医院感染预防和控制状况:完成世卫组织感染预防和控制评估框架(IPCAF)的81家医院的数据。
背景:世卫组织感染预防和控制评估框架(IPCAF)可用于系统地评估卫生保健机构的感染预防和控制(IPC)做法。2018年,使用IPCAF对奥地利医院进行的一项调查显示,IPC的总体实施水平很高。在这里,我们报告了与IPCAF在奥地利医院进行的第二次调查的结果,再次评估IPC实施状况并调查自2018年以来的潜在发展。方法:共邀请参加德国监测网络“KISS”的139家奥地利急症护理医院在2023年10月至2024年1月期间完成IPCAF的在线翻译版本。IPCAF的功能类似于一份问卷,其中每个回答都被赋予一个特定的分值,从而可以计算出IPC的总体得分。根据这一评分,医院被分为四个不同的IPC级别:不足、基本、中级和高级。然后计算总得分,并与2018年的结果进行比较。结果:收到并分析了81家医院的完整数据集。总体IPCAF得分中位数为645分(四分位数范围:598-685),其中59家医院(72.9%)被列为高级医院,21家医院(25.9%)被列为中级医院。1家医院(1.2%)属于基础医院。与IPC教育和培训以及多模式IPC战略的应用有关的问题得分最低。与2018年相比,目前645分的中位数略高(2018年的中位数:620;数据来自65家医院),每250张病床配备一名全职IPC专业人员的医院比例显著提高了37个百分点。然而,关于世卫组织IPC教育和培训核心部分的问题下降最为明显(中位数得分- 5)。结论:奥地利的IPC标准总体呈上升趋势,特别是在IPC人员编制方面。然而,仍有有待改进的地方,医院应努力加强IPC教育和培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信