The relationship between maternal oral health parameters, inflammatory blood markers, and the evaluation of their effects on preterm low birth weight.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Isa Temur, Katibe Tugce Temur, Safak Necati Dönertas, Aycan Dal Dönertas, Mustafa Kacmaz
{"title":"The relationship between maternal oral health parameters, inflammatory blood markers, and the evaluation of their effects on preterm low birth weight.","authors":"Isa Temur, Katibe Tugce Temur, Safak Necati Dönertas, Aycan Dal Dönertas, Mustafa Kacmaz","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07337-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm birth significantly elevates neonatal mortality and morbidity, often resulting in developmental challenges and severe health consequences. Risk factor identification is essential for preventative measures. This research aimed to assess maternal oral health's effects on inflammatory blood markers and determine a possible relationship with preterm low birth weight (PLBW).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a cross-sectional and case-control design. A randomized cohort of fifty women who delivered low-birth-weight infants was compared to a matched control group of fifty women who delivered full-term infants. Oral health was evaluated using the DMFT (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth), DMFS (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Surfaces), Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Pocket Depth (PD), and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL). Patient history and relevant hematological data were retrieved from medical records. Logistic regression modeling was conducted on variables exhibiting statistical significance (p < 0.05) following group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The case group showed significantly higher oral health indices than the control group, with median DMFT scores of 7.14 vs. 4.74 (p = 0.013), DMFS scores of 20.58 vs. 12.08 (p = 0.026), PI values of 1.96 vs. 1.18, GI values of 2.03 vs. 1.20, and PD values of 2.61 mm vs. 2.00 mm (all p < 0.001). However, none of these parameters (DMFT, DMFS, PI, GI, or PD) were significant predictors of PLBW (p > 0.05). Weak positive correlations were observed between PI, GI, PD, and leukocyte counts (r = 0.240, p = 0.016; r = 0.248, p = 0.013; and r = 0.220, p = 0.028, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the study's limitations, the principal results suggest a statistically significant difference in oral health, with women delivering low birth weight infants exhibiting poorer outcomes than control groups. Analysis of secondary outcomes indicates that oral health is not an independent predictor of preterm birth; instead, its contribution may be indirect and through systemic inflammation. Effective collaboration between obstetricians and dentists is crucial for the early detection and management of oral health issues in pregnant patients. Prioritizing the creation of public health policies designed to reduce the incidence of preterm births and strengthen maternal-fetal well-being is essential.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07337-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth significantly elevates neonatal mortality and morbidity, often resulting in developmental challenges and severe health consequences. Risk factor identification is essential for preventative measures. This research aimed to assess maternal oral health's effects on inflammatory blood markers and determine a possible relationship with preterm low birth weight (PLBW).

Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional and case-control design. A randomized cohort of fifty women who delivered low-birth-weight infants was compared to a matched control group of fifty women who delivered full-term infants. Oral health was evaluated using the DMFT (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth), DMFS (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Surfaces), Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Pocket Depth (PD), and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL). Patient history and relevant hematological data were retrieved from medical records. Logistic regression modeling was conducted on variables exhibiting statistical significance (p < 0.05) following group comparisons.

Results: The case group showed significantly higher oral health indices than the control group, with median DMFT scores of 7.14 vs. 4.74 (p = 0.013), DMFS scores of 20.58 vs. 12.08 (p = 0.026), PI values of 1.96 vs. 1.18, GI values of 2.03 vs. 1.20, and PD values of 2.61 mm vs. 2.00 mm (all p < 0.001). However, none of these parameters (DMFT, DMFS, PI, GI, or PD) were significant predictors of PLBW (p > 0.05). Weak positive correlations were observed between PI, GI, PD, and leukocyte counts (r = 0.240, p = 0.016; r = 0.248, p = 0.013; and r = 0.220, p = 0.028, respectively).

Conclusions: Considering the study's limitations, the principal results suggest a statistically significant difference in oral health, with women delivering low birth weight infants exhibiting poorer outcomes than control groups. Analysis of secondary outcomes indicates that oral health is not an independent predictor of preterm birth; instead, its contribution may be indirect and through systemic inflammation. Effective collaboration between obstetricians and dentists is crucial for the early detection and management of oral health issues in pregnant patients. Prioritizing the creation of public health policies designed to reduce the incidence of preterm births and strengthen maternal-fetal well-being is essential.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信