Bayesian Optimization over Multiple Experimental Fidelities Accelerates Automated Discovery of Drug Molecules.

IF 12.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Central Science Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1021/acscentsci.4c01991
Matthew A McDonald, Brent A Koscher, Richard B Canty, Jason Zhang, Angelina Ning, Klavs F Jensen
{"title":"Bayesian Optimization over Multiple Experimental Fidelities Accelerates Automated Discovery of Drug Molecules.","authors":"Matthew A McDonald, Brent A Koscher, Richard B Canty, Jason Zhang, Angelina Ning, Klavs F Jensen","doi":"10.1021/acscentsci.4c01991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different experiments of differing fidelities are commonly used in the search for new drug molecules. In classic experimental funnels, libraries of molecules undergo sequential rounds of virtual, coarse, and refined experimental screenings, with each level balanced between the cost of experiments and the number of molecules screened. Bayesian optimization offers an alternative approach, using iterative experiments to locate optimal molecules with fewer experiments than large-scale screening, but without the ability to weigh the costs and benefits of different types of experiments. In this work, we combine the multifidelity approach of the experimental funnel with Bayesian optimization to search for drug molecules iteratively, taking full advantage of different types of experiments, their costs, and the quality of the data they produce. We first demonstrate the utility of the multifidelity Bayesian optimization (MF-BO) approach on a series of drug targets with data reported in ChEMBL, emphasizing what properties of the chemical search space result in substantial acceleration with MF-BO. Then we integrate the MF-BO experiment selection algorithm into an autonomous molecular discovery platform to illustrate the prospective search for new histone deacetylase inhibitors using docking scores, single-point percent inhibitions, and dose-response IC<sub>50</sub> values as low-, medium-, and high-fidelity experiments. A chemical search space with appropriate diversity and fidelity correlation for use with MF-BO was constructed with a genetic generative algorithm. The MF-BO integrated platform then docked more than 3,500 molecules, automatically synthesized and screened more than 120 molecules for percent inhibition, and selected a handful of molecules for manual evaluation at the highest fidelity. Many of the molecules screened have never been reported in any capacity. At the end of the search, several new histone deacetylase inhibitors were found with submicromolar inhibition, free of problematic hydroxamate moieties that constrain the use of current inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10,"journal":{"name":"ACS Central Science","volume":"11 2","pages":"346-356"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Central Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.4c01991","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different experiments of differing fidelities are commonly used in the search for new drug molecules. In classic experimental funnels, libraries of molecules undergo sequential rounds of virtual, coarse, and refined experimental screenings, with each level balanced between the cost of experiments and the number of molecules screened. Bayesian optimization offers an alternative approach, using iterative experiments to locate optimal molecules with fewer experiments than large-scale screening, but without the ability to weigh the costs and benefits of different types of experiments. In this work, we combine the multifidelity approach of the experimental funnel with Bayesian optimization to search for drug molecules iteratively, taking full advantage of different types of experiments, their costs, and the quality of the data they produce. We first demonstrate the utility of the multifidelity Bayesian optimization (MF-BO) approach on a series of drug targets with data reported in ChEMBL, emphasizing what properties of the chemical search space result in substantial acceleration with MF-BO. Then we integrate the MF-BO experiment selection algorithm into an autonomous molecular discovery platform to illustrate the prospective search for new histone deacetylase inhibitors using docking scores, single-point percent inhibitions, and dose-response IC50 values as low-, medium-, and high-fidelity experiments. A chemical search space with appropriate diversity and fidelity correlation for use with MF-BO was constructed with a genetic generative algorithm. The MF-BO integrated platform then docked more than 3,500 molecules, automatically synthesized and screened more than 120 molecules for percent inhibition, and selected a handful of molecules for manual evaluation at the highest fidelity. Many of the molecules screened have never been reported in any capacity. At the end of the search, several new histone deacetylase inhibitors were found with submicromolar inhibition, free of problematic hydroxamate moieties that constrain the use of current inhibitors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Central Science
ACS Central Science Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
25.50
自引率
0.50%
发文量
194
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ACS Central Science publishes significant primary reports on research in chemistry and allied fields where chemical approaches are pivotal. As the first fully open-access journal by the American Chemical Society, it covers compelling and important contributions to the broad chemistry and scientific community. "Central science," a term popularized nearly 40 years ago, emphasizes chemistry's central role in connecting physical and life sciences, and fundamental sciences with applied disciplines like medicine and engineering. The journal focuses on exceptional quality articles, addressing advances in fundamental chemistry and interdisciplinary research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信