Spinocerebellar Ataxia Progression Measured with the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anna L Burt, Gilbert L'Italien, Susan L Perlman, Liana S Rosenthal, Sheng-Han Kuo, Tetsuo Ashizawa, Theresa Zesiewicz, Cameron Dietiker, Puneet Opal, Antoine Duquette, George R Wilmot, Vikram G Shakkottai, Christopher M Gomez, Sharan R Srinivasan, Henry Paulson, Michael D Geschwind, Sandie Worley, Chiadi U Onyike, Andrew Billnitzer, Amy Ferng, Kristen Matulis, Marie Y Davis, Sub H Subramony, Anoopum Gupta, Christopher D Stephen, Jeremy D Schmahmann
{"title":"Spinocerebellar Ataxia Progression Measured with the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia.","authors":"Anna L Burt, Gilbert L'Italien, Susan L Perlman, Liana S Rosenthal, Sheng-Han Kuo, Tetsuo Ashizawa, Theresa Zesiewicz, Cameron Dietiker, Puneet Opal, Antoine Duquette, George R Wilmot, Vikram G Shakkottai, Christopher M Gomez, Sharan R Srinivasan, Henry Paulson, Michael D Geschwind, Sandie Worley, Chiadi U Onyike, Andrew Billnitzer, Amy Ferng, Kristen Matulis, Marie Y Davis, Sub H Subramony, Anoopum Gupta, Christopher D Stephen, Jeremy D Schmahmann","doi":"10.1002/mds.30158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia) has been validated cross-sectionally but not longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to validate PROM-Ataxia as a measure of patient experience of disease over time, examine overall and domain-specific progression, and test convergent validity with other clinical outcome assessments (COAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We derived PROM-Ataxia data from 176 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, or 10 in the Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxia at baseline and 1 year. We classified patients' ataxia severity stage (\"severity\") according to the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale Functional Staging into mild, moderate, and severe subgroups. Analyses of the entire cohort and by severity subgroup included internal consistency, sensitivity to disease severity, predictive modeling of score changes, correlations with COAs: Brief Ataxia Rating Scale, Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, Fatigue Severity Scale, Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome scale, EuroQol 5-Dimension, and responsiveness to disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PROM-Ataxia exhibited high internal consistency and correlated with other COAs. Scores demonstrated sensitivity to disease severity and evolving patient experience. Progression was sigmoidal, with the greatest change in moderate patients. Compared with other COAs, PROM-Ataxia captured the most change. Mental features worsened fastest in mild patients, physical in moderate patients, and activities of daily living in severe patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PROM-Ataxia is more sensitive to change than ataxia COAs, captures the evolution of patients' experience of disease over 1 year, and reveals domain-specific progression. Studies of larger cohorts and different ataxia diagnoses over longer periods may provide insights to further enhance clinical care and research. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.</p>","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.30158","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia) has been validated cross-sectionally but not longitudinally.

Objective: We aimed to validate PROM-Ataxia as a measure of patient experience of disease over time, examine overall and domain-specific progression, and test convergent validity with other clinical outcome assessments (COAs).

Methods: We derived PROM-Ataxia data from 176 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, or 10 in the Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxia at baseline and 1 year. We classified patients' ataxia severity stage ("severity") according to the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale Functional Staging into mild, moderate, and severe subgroups. Analyses of the entire cohort and by severity subgroup included internal consistency, sensitivity to disease severity, predictive modeling of score changes, correlations with COAs: Brief Ataxia Rating Scale, Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, Fatigue Severity Scale, Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome scale, EuroQol 5-Dimension, and responsiveness to disease progression.

Results: The PROM-Ataxia exhibited high internal consistency and correlated with other COAs. Scores demonstrated sensitivity to disease severity and evolving patient experience. Progression was sigmoidal, with the greatest change in moderate patients. Compared with other COAs, PROM-Ataxia captured the most change. Mental features worsened fastest in mild patients, physical in moderate patients, and activities of daily living in severe patients.

Conclusion: PROM-Ataxia is more sensitive to change than ataxia COAs, captures the evolution of patients' experience of disease over 1 year, and reveals domain-specific progression. Studies of larger cohorts and different ataxia diagnoses over longer periods may provide insights to further enhance clinical care and research. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
371
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信