Encapsulation of Zootechnical Additives for Poultry and Swine Feeding: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Omega Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.4c08080
Liliana Berté Fontana, Guilherme Schwingel Henn, Carolina Horst Dos Santos, Luana Specht, Caroline Schmitz, Claucia Fernanda Volken de Souza, Daniel Neutzling Lehn
{"title":"Encapsulation of Zootechnical Additives for Poultry and Swine Feeding: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Liliana Berté Fontana, Guilherme Schwingel Henn, Carolina Horst Dos Santos, Luana Specht, Caroline Schmitz, Claucia Fernanda Volken de Souza, Daniel Neutzling Lehn","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c08080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The search for alternatives to certain antibiotics in animal nutrition has propelled the study of encapsulated essential oils and organic acids considering their potential to generate beneficial effects in animal organisms. The objective of this study was to compile and discuss scientific findings published between 2013 and July 2024 from two databases related to the usage of encapsulated essential oils and organic acids in the supplementation of poultry and swine feeds. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology, covering the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which initially yielded 115 selected articles. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 relevant articles were selected for comprehensive analysis. The studies demonstrate that the encapsulation of essential oils and organic acids is an alternative to reduce the utilization of conventional antibiotics, as encapsulation has the potential to maintain the properties of these compounds while ensuring greater stability and controlled release within the animal organism. The selection of appropriate encapsulation technologies, encapsulating agents, and zootechnical additives is crucial to maximizing the effectiveness of these compounds in animal nutrition. Despite the identification of gaps in the analyzed studies regarding specific details of the techniques used and regulatory considerations, encapsulated essential oils and organic acids show potential to reduce the need for antibiotics in animal production along with other added benefits. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of the subject, aiming to guide and contribute to future research efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 7","pages":"6294-6305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c08080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The search for alternatives to certain antibiotics in animal nutrition has propelled the study of encapsulated essential oils and organic acids considering their potential to generate beneficial effects in animal organisms. The objective of this study was to compile and discuss scientific findings published between 2013 and July 2024 from two databases related to the usage of encapsulated essential oils and organic acids in the supplementation of poultry and swine feeds. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology, covering the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which initially yielded 115 selected articles. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 relevant articles were selected for comprehensive analysis. The studies demonstrate that the encapsulation of essential oils and organic acids is an alternative to reduce the utilization of conventional antibiotics, as encapsulation has the potential to maintain the properties of these compounds while ensuring greater stability and controlled release within the animal organism. The selection of appropriate encapsulation technologies, encapsulating agents, and zootechnical additives is crucial to maximizing the effectiveness of these compounds in animal nutrition. Despite the identification of gaps in the analyzed studies regarding specific details of the techniques used and regulatory considerations, encapsulated essential oils and organic acids show potential to reduce the need for antibiotics in animal production along with other added benefits. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of the subject, aiming to guide and contribute to future research efforts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

家禽和猪饲料用动物技术添加剂的封装:系统综述。
寻找动物营养中某些抗生素的替代品推动了对胶囊精油和有机酸的研究,因为它们有可能对动物有机体产生有益的影响。本研究的目的是汇编和讨论2013年至2024年7月期间发表的两个数据库中与在家禽和猪饲料中添加胶囊精油和有机酸有关的科学发现。按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法进行了系统评价,涵盖了PubMed和Web of Science数据库,最初产生了115篇选定的文章。应用纳入和排除标准,选取21篇相关文献进行综合分析。研究表明,精油和有机酸的包封是减少传统抗生素使用的一种替代方法,因为包封有可能保持这些化合物的特性,同时确保更大的稳定性和在动物体内的控制释放。选择合适的包封技术、包封剂和动物技术添加剂对于最大限度地提高这些化合物在动物营养中的有效性至关重要。尽管在分析的研究中发现了所使用技术的具体细节和监管考虑方面的差距,但胶囊精油和有机酸显示出减少动物生产对抗生素需求的潜力以及其他附加效益。这篇综述提供了一个全面的概述,旨在指导和促进未来的研究工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信