Access to abortion in Canada

IF 25.4 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Martha Jane Paynter
{"title":"Access to abortion in Canada","authors":"Martha Jane Paynter","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00041-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study in <em>The Lancet Public Health</em> by Erin Brennand and colleagues<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> looking at abortion care in Alberta, Canada, tests an optimistic hypothesis held by many, that the 2017 implementation and deregulation of mifepristone for medication abortion would substantially improve access to care. Until 2017, abortion in Canada was almost exclusively available through procedures carried out by physicians in urban centres.<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span> Using Ontario population-based administration data from 2012 to 2020, Schummers and colleagues<span><span><sup>3</sup></span></span> found that after its introduction, medication abortion increased rapidly as a proportion of abortion overall. In 2019, Renner and colleagues<span><span><sup>4</sup></span></span> surveyed Canada's abortion workforce and found 83% of the 465 respondents reported providing first-trimester medication abortion. Furthermore, nurse practitioners constituted 6% of respondents, and 44% of abortion in rural areas was through medication abortion. These studies pointed to the effect that medication abortion was swiftly making on practice. By 2022, the Canadian Institute of Health Information reported that 39·5% of abortion across the country was by medication.<span><span><sup>5</sup></span></span> But was that effect equal across populations? Brennand and colleagues provide an overview of changing abortion care in Alberta specifically.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00041-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study in The Lancet Public Health by Erin Brennand and colleagues1 looking at abortion care in Alberta, Canada, tests an optimistic hypothesis held by many, that the 2017 implementation and deregulation of mifepristone for medication abortion would substantially improve access to care. Until 2017, abortion in Canada was almost exclusively available through procedures carried out by physicians in urban centres.2 Using Ontario population-based administration data from 2012 to 2020, Schummers and colleagues3 found that after its introduction, medication abortion increased rapidly as a proportion of abortion overall. In 2019, Renner and colleagues4 surveyed Canada's abortion workforce and found 83% of the 465 respondents reported providing first-trimester medication abortion. Furthermore, nurse practitioners constituted 6% of respondents, and 44% of abortion in rural areas was through medication abortion. These studies pointed to the effect that medication abortion was swiftly making on practice. By 2022, the Canadian Institute of Health Information reported that 39·5% of abortion across the country was by medication.5 But was that effect equal across populations? Brennand and colleagues provide an overview of changing abortion care in Alberta specifically.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Public Health
Lancet Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
55.60
自引率
0.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Public Health is committed to tackling the most pressing issues across all aspects of public health. We have a strong commitment to using science to improve health equity and social justice. In line with the values and vision of The Lancet, we take a broad and inclusive approach to public health and are interested in interdisciplinary research. We publish a range of content types that can advance public health policies and outcomes. These include Articles, Review, Comment, and Correspondence. Learn more about the types of papers we publish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信