Cancer screening inequities and people with intellectual disabilities—what should we do to close the gaps?

IF 25.4 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hannah Kuper, Luthfi Azizatunnisa’
{"title":"Cancer screening inequities and people with intellectual disabilities—what should we do to close the gaps?","authors":"Hannah Kuper, Luthfi Azizatunnisa’","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00037-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence from electronic health records is transforming what we know about the health inequalities experienced by people with disabilities. In <em>The Lancet Public Health</em>, Amina Banda and colleagues produced another excellent example of this approach, using large-scale data from the Netherlands to demonstrate that participation in cancer screening programmes is around 20% lower for people with intellectual disabilities than in the general population.<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> The inequities were remarkably similar across the breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening programmes, even though the programmes are different in terms of targeted age and gender, and the demands placed on the participant. The findings are also consistent with reports from elsewhere, despite the divergence in how the screening programmes operate and target participants in different countries.<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span> This Article also adds a piece to the puzzle of explaining why people with intellectual disabilities are dying earlier than the general population.<span><span><sup>3</sup></span></span>","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"190 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00037-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence from electronic health records is transforming what we know about the health inequalities experienced by people with disabilities. In The Lancet Public Health, Amina Banda and colleagues produced another excellent example of this approach, using large-scale data from the Netherlands to demonstrate that participation in cancer screening programmes is around 20% lower for people with intellectual disabilities than in the general population.1 The inequities were remarkably similar across the breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening programmes, even though the programmes are different in terms of targeted age and gender, and the demands placed on the participant. The findings are also consistent with reports from elsewhere, despite the divergence in how the screening programmes operate and target participants in different countries.2 This Article also adds a piece to the puzzle of explaining why people with intellectual disabilities are dying earlier than the general population.3
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Public Health
Lancet Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
55.60
自引率
0.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Public Health is committed to tackling the most pressing issues across all aspects of public health. We have a strong commitment to using science to improve health equity and social justice. In line with the values and vision of The Lancet, we take a broad and inclusive approach to public health and are interested in interdisciplinary research. We publish a range of content types that can advance public health policies and outcomes. These include Articles, Review, Comment, and Correspondence. Learn more about the types of papers we publish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信