Robust finite-time input-to-state stability via impulsive hybrid control for uncertain dynamical systems with disturbances.

Bin Liu, Meng-Ge Li, Ya-Dan Shi, Dong-Nan Liu
{"title":"Robust finite-time input-to-state stability via impulsive hybrid control for uncertain dynamical systems with disturbances.","authors":"Bin Liu, Meng-Ge Li, Ya-Dan Shi, Dong-Nan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.isatra.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper studies the robust finite-time input-to-state stability (R-FT-ISS) including robust finite-time stability (R-FTS) via impulsive hybrid control (IHC) for uncertain dynamical systems (UDS) with disturbances. The notions of robust GKL-stability, R-FT-ISS, and R-FTS are proposed. Time-based IHC (T-IHC) and state-based IHC (S-IHC) are proposed, respectively. And based on the Hamilton-Jacobi inequalities of Lyapunov-like functions, less restrictive R-FT-ISS and R-FTS criteria are established for UDS under IHC (including T-IHC and S-IHC). And the event-triggered S-IHC schemes for R-FT-ISS and R-FTS are designed. Correspondingly, the estimates of settling time for R-FT-ISS and R-FTS are also obtained, respectively. Theoretical results and numerical simulations show that both T-IHC and S-IHC can achieve not only R-FT-ISS but also R-FTS for unstable systems with structural disturbances and external disturbances. Therefore, IHC (including T-IHC and S-IHC) can eliminate the impact on stability from disturbances and thus both T-IHC and S-IHC are anti-disturbance and robust, which improves the stabilization only to ISS (not to asymptotic stability) in the presence of disturbance in the literature. It is also shown that R-FT-ISS and R-FTS can be achieved by pure impulsive control, which improves the FTS results of impulsive systems in the literature. Moreover, compared with T-IHC, S-IHC has less number of impulses and lower cost than T-IHC while T-IHC has smaller settling time.</p>","PeriodicalId":94059,"journal":{"name":"ISA transactions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISA transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2025.02.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies the robust finite-time input-to-state stability (R-FT-ISS) including robust finite-time stability (R-FTS) via impulsive hybrid control (IHC) for uncertain dynamical systems (UDS) with disturbances. The notions of robust GKL-stability, R-FT-ISS, and R-FTS are proposed. Time-based IHC (T-IHC) and state-based IHC (S-IHC) are proposed, respectively. And based on the Hamilton-Jacobi inequalities of Lyapunov-like functions, less restrictive R-FT-ISS and R-FTS criteria are established for UDS under IHC (including T-IHC and S-IHC). And the event-triggered S-IHC schemes for R-FT-ISS and R-FTS are designed. Correspondingly, the estimates of settling time for R-FT-ISS and R-FTS are also obtained, respectively. Theoretical results and numerical simulations show that both T-IHC and S-IHC can achieve not only R-FT-ISS but also R-FTS for unstable systems with structural disturbances and external disturbances. Therefore, IHC (including T-IHC and S-IHC) can eliminate the impact on stability from disturbances and thus both T-IHC and S-IHC are anti-disturbance and robust, which improves the stabilization only to ISS (not to asymptotic stability) in the presence of disturbance in the literature. It is also shown that R-FT-ISS and R-FTS can be achieved by pure impulsive control, which improves the FTS results of impulsive systems in the literature. Moreover, compared with T-IHC, S-IHC has less number of impulses and lower cost than T-IHC while T-IHC has smaller settling time.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信