Exploring Benefits of Instructional Coaching as a Model to Improve Teaching Practices in Pharmacy Education

IF 3.8 4区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101382

Justin Cole Wilder, Sandy Diec

{"title":"Exploring Benefits of Instructional Coaching as a Model to Improve Teaching Practices in Pharmacy Education","authors":"Justin Cole Wilder, Sandy Diec","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This narrative review explores instructional coaching as a valuable faculty development strategy in pharmacy education to enhance teaching practices and improve student learning outcomes. This manuscript serves as a preliminary examination of the potential benefits of instructional coaching, drawing on current literature.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education standards emphasize professional development to improve faculty performance. However, traditional offerings often lack personalization, sustained practice, and empirical links to improved student achievement. In contrast, instructional coaching provides personalized, job-embedded support through collaborative dialogue. It fosters the application of evidence-based teaching methods, promotes educator self-reflection on learner-centered practices, and bridges the gap between theory and practice. While limited data exist on instructional coaching in pharmacy education, substantial research demonstrates that it significantly enhances teaching quality and student outcomes in elementary and secondary education. Instructional coaching encourages instructors to engage in critical reflection on their teaching philosophies and learners' needs. This reflective practice is essential for academic development and for transitioning from educator-centered to learner-centered instruction.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>Instructional coaching emerges as a promising model to improve pharmacy faculty's instructional practices and student learning outcomes. By providing personalized, job-embedded support fostering reflective practice, it can shift beliefs and bridge the gap between theory and practice. Pharmacy education stakeholders should implement and evaluate instructional coaching through robust research to validate its effectiveness, examining impacts on instructor development, teaching quality, and student achievement. As learner needs evolve, this faculty development approach ultimately aims to enhance pharmacy education and promote student success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 4","pages":"Article 101382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This narrative review explores instructional coaching as a valuable faculty development strategy in pharmacy education to enhance teaching practices and improve student learning outcomes. This manuscript serves as a preliminary examination of the potential benefits of instructional coaching, drawing on current literature.

Findings

The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education standards emphasize professional development to improve faculty performance. However, traditional offerings often lack personalization, sustained practice, and empirical links to improved student achievement. In contrast, instructional coaching provides personalized, job-embedded support through collaborative dialogue. It fosters the application of evidence-based teaching methods, promotes educator self-reflection on learner-centered practices, and bridges the gap between theory and practice. While limited data exist on instructional coaching in pharmacy education, substantial research demonstrates that it significantly enhances teaching quality and student outcomes in elementary and secondary education. Instructional coaching encourages instructors to engage in critical reflection on their teaching philosophies and learners' needs. This reflective practice is essential for academic development and for transitioning from educator-centered to learner-centered instruction.

Summary

Instructional coaching emerges as a promising model to improve pharmacy faculty's instructional practices and student learning outcomes. By providing personalized, job-embedded support fostering reflective practice, it can shift beliefs and bridge the gap between theory and practice. Pharmacy education stakeholders should implement and evaluate instructional coaching through robust research to validate its effectiveness, examining impacts on instructor development, teaching quality, and student achievement. As learner needs evolve, this faculty development approach ultimately aims to enhance pharmacy education and promote student success.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 医学-学科教育

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

15.20%

发文量

114

期刊介绍： The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.