Hysterectomy and Myomectomy vs Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Fibroids and Adenomyosis: National and Regional Trends and Adverse Events in 70,000 Patients.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Amy R Deipolyi, Frank Annie, Stephen H Bush, James Spies
{"title":"Hysterectomy and Myomectomy vs Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Fibroids and Adenomyosis: National and Regional Trends and Adverse Events in 70,000 Patients.","authors":"Amy R Deipolyi, Frank Annie, Stephen H Bush, James Spies","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.02.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare patient characteristics, regional utilization, and post-operative outcomes between uterine artery embolization (UAE), myomectomy and hysterectomy for fibroids and adenomyosis, and assess whether post-operative adverse events were more common after hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This observational study identified all women who underwent UAE, myomectomy or hysterectomy for fibroids or adenomyosis from 2016-2019 in the US, using TriNetX, a multi-institution database of anonymous health records, yielding 78,758 patients, (UAE: 2,505; hysterectomy: 60,333; myomectomy: 15,920). Regional procedure utilization was assessed. Length of stay (LOS), re-intervention, and post-procedure adverse events including pelvic floor prolapse and intestinal obstruction were compared. Pregnancy and miscarriage rates after UAE and myomectomy were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to UAE, hysterectomy was associated with longer LOS (5 v. 1 day, P<0.01), more blood transfusions (1.8 v. 0.7%, P<0.01), increased pelvic floor prolapse (7.1 v. 1.7%, P<0.01) and intestinal obstruction (3.4 v. 1.2%, P<0.01), and decreased reintervention (0 v. 15.5%, P<0.01) within 5 years; myomectomy was associated with more blood transfusions (2.0 v. 0.7%, P<0.01), fewer emergency room visits within 1 month (2.9 v. 6.8%, P=0.01), and similar re-intervention rates (17.0 v. 15.5%; P=0.06). Pregnancy occurred in 92/2,505 (3.6%) UAE and 2,744/15,920 (17.2%) myomectomy patients, with 18% and 11% miscarriage rates, respectively (P=0.07). UAE utilization was similar across US regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite increased adverse events including intestinal obstruction and pelvic floor prolapse, hysterectomy was the most common intervention in women with uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Reintervention occurred after in 15-20% of patients after UAE or myomectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.02.026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare patient characteristics, regional utilization, and post-operative outcomes between uterine artery embolization (UAE), myomectomy and hysterectomy for fibroids and adenomyosis, and assess whether post-operative adverse events were more common after hysterectomy.

Materials and methods: This observational study identified all women who underwent UAE, myomectomy or hysterectomy for fibroids or adenomyosis from 2016-2019 in the US, using TriNetX, a multi-institution database of anonymous health records, yielding 78,758 patients, (UAE: 2,505; hysterectomy: 60,333; myomectomy: 15,920). Regional procedure utilization was assessed. Length of stay (LOS), re-intervention, and post-procedure adverse events including pelvic floor prolapse and intestinal obstruction were compared. Pregnancy and miscarriage rates after UAE and myomectomy were assessed.

Results: Compared to UAE, hysterectomy was associated with longer LOS (5 v. 1 day, P<0.01), more blood transfusions (1.8 v. 0.7%, P<0.01), increased pelvic floor prolapse (7.1 v. 1.7%, P<0.01) and intestinal obstruction (3.4 v. 1.2%, P<0.01), and decreased reintervention (0 v. 15.5%, P<0.01) within 5 years; myomectomy was associated with more blood transfusions (2.0 v. 0.7%, P<0.01), fewer emergency room visits within 1 month (2.9 v. 6.8%, P=0.01), and similar re-intervention rates (17.0 v. 15.5%; P=0.06). Pregnancy occurred in 92/2,505 (3.6%) UAE and 2,744/15,920 (17.2%) myomectomy patients, with 18% and 11% miscarriage rates, respectively (P=0.07). UAE utilization was similar across US regions.

Conclusion: Despite increased adverse events including intestinal obstruction and pelvic floor prolapse, hysterectomy was the most common intervention in women with uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Reintervention occurred after in 15-20% of patients after UAE or myomectomy.

子宫切除术和肌瘤剔除术与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗症状性子宫肌瘤和腺肌病:7万名患者的全国和地区趋势及不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
942
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信