The Impact of Abortion Laws on the Decision to Undergo Vasectomy

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Parviz K. Kavoussi , Romtin Mehrabani-Farsi , Hayden T. Henderson , Arya Farahi , Negar Farzaneh , Shahryar K. Kavoussi
{"title":"The Impact of Abortion Laws on the Decision to Undergo Vasectomy","authors":"Parviz K. Kavoussi ,&nbsp;Romtin Mehrabani-Farsi ,&nbsp;Hayden T. Henderson ,&nbsp;Arya Farahi ,&nbsp;Negar Farzaneh ,&nbsp;Shahryar K. Kavoussi","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.02.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To assess trends in men who underwent vasectomy before and after the Texas abortion law which passed on May 19, 2021, and the direct impact of the reversal of Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, on the decision for vasectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Retrospective review of the electronic health records from a private reproductive urology center, including all consecutive patients undergoing vasectomy with no exclusions from October 1, 2010 to June 26, 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data were reviewed on 2642 men who underwent vasectomy. After the Texas law change men were younger and had fewer children, there was a higher percentage without children, than those who underwent vasectomy prior. There were more single men who underwent vasectomy after.</div><div>Of 377 men who underwent vasectomy following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, 39.3% reported it directly impact their decision for vasectomy. The men who reported it impacted their decision had fewer number of children at the time of vasectomy. There was not a difference in marital status impacting the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rulings effect on the decision for vasectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is an association between the Texas abortion law and trends in younger men seeking vasectomy with fewer children, more men without children, and more single men opting for vasectomy following the law. Of men who underwent vasectomy following the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, 39.3% reported the ruling directly impacted their decision for vasectomy. These men had fewer children at the time of vasectomy and no difference in marital status compared to men who the ruling did not impact their decision for vasectomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":"200 ","pages":"Pages 72-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429525002006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

To assess trends in men who underwent vasectomy before and after the Texas abortion law which passed on May 19, 2021, and the direct impact of the reversal of Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, on the decision for vasectomy.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review of the electronic health records from a private reproductive urology center, including all consecutive patients undergoing vasectomy with no exclusions from October 1, 2010 to June 26, 2022.

Results

Data were reviewed on 2642 men who underwent vasectomy. After the Texas law change men were younger and had fewer children, there was a higher percentage without children, than those who underwent vasectomy prior. There were more single men who underwent vasectomy after.
Of 377 men who underwent vasectomy following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, 39.3% reported it directly impact their decision for vasectomy. The men who reported it impacted their decision had fewer number of children at the time of vasectomy. There was not a difference in marital status impacting the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rulings effect on the decision for vasectomy.

Conclusion

There is an association between the Texas abortion law and trends in younger men seeking vasectomy with fewer children, more men without children, and more single men opting for vasectomy following the law. Of men who underwent vasectomy following the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, 39.3% reported the ruling directly impacted their decision for vasectomy. These men had fewer children at the time of vasectomy and no difference in marital status compared to men who the ruling did not impact their decision for vasectomy.
堕胎法对决定进行输精管切除术的影响。
目的:评估2021年5月19日德克萨斯州堕胎法案通过前后接受输精管切除术的男性趋势,以及2022年6月24日Roe v Wade一案的逆转对输精管切除术决定的直接影响。材料和方法:回顾性分析一家私立生殖泌尿外科中心的电子健康记录,包括2010年10月1日至2022年6月26日期间所有连续接受输精管切除术的患者。结果:对2642名接受输精管切除术的男性进行了数据回顾。在德克萨斯州的法律改变后,男性更年轻,孩子更少,没有孩子的比例比之前做过输精管切除术的人要高。之后有更多的单身男性接受了输精管切除术。在罗伊诉韦德案被推翻后接受输精管切除术的377名男性中,39.3%的人表示这直接影响了他们的输精管切除术决定。报告影响其决定的男性在输精管结扎时的孩子数量较少。婚姻状况的差异没有影响美国最高法院(SCOTUS)裁决对输精管结扎决定的影响。结论:德克萨斯州堕胎法与以下趋势之间存在关联:有较少孩子的年轻男性寻求输精管切除术,更多的没有孩子的男性,以及更多的单身男性选择输精管切除术。在最高法院推翻罗伊诉韦德案判决后接受输精管切除术的男性中,39.3%的人表示,该判决直接影响了他们决定进行输精管切除术。在输精管结扎时,这些男性的孩子更少,婚姻状况与那些判决不影响输精管结扎决定的男性相比没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信