Modifications to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis following COVID-19 and Following Models.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1159/000544977
Miroslav Stojadinovic, Milorad Stojadinovic, Slobodan Jankovic
{"title":"Modifications to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis following COVID-19 and Following Models.","authors":"Miroslav Stojadinovic, Milorad Stojadinovic, Slobodan Jankovic","doi":"10.1159/000544977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). The study examines any predictions that could point to future models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two interrupted time series analyses were conducted: one for the pre-COVID period (January 2017 to December 2019) and another for the post-COVID period during 2022. Information on age, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal exam (DRE), prostate volume, previous negative biopsy, number of positive biopsies, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were collected for all patients. The categories for the results were no cancer, insignificant, low and intermediate, high-risk, and very high-risk PCa. Using a generalized linear model (GLM), the outcomes are modeled. The area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were used to assess how well multi-class predictions performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 244 patients who had biopsies following the COVID-19 pandemic and 832 patients who had biopsies before the pandemic were compared. The accuracy of the GLM was only 0.635. The AUC for categories no-cancer, low- and intermediate-risk, and very high-risk patients was 0.821, 0.716, and 0.926. With scaled relevance values, PSA was the most critical test. The two features that significantly influenced the treatment model prediction for PCa were biopsy PSA level and DRE, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced age and a very high-risk group appear to have a detrimental impact on the results of biopsies conducted after the first wave of the COVID-19 era. At the same time, PSA levels and abnormal DRE are the most significant predictors in GLM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"332-340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). The study examines any predictions that could point to future models.

Methods: Two interrupted time series analyses were conducted: one for the pre-COVID period (January 2017 to December 2019) and another for the post-COVID period during 2022. Information on age, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal exam (DRE), prostate volume, previous negative biopsy, number of positive biopsies, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were collected for all patients. The categories for the results were no cancer, insignificant, low and intermediate, high-risk, and very high-risk PCa. Using a generalized linear model (GLM), the outcomes are modeled. The area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were used to assess how well multi-class predictions performed.

Results: Overall, 244 patients who had biopsies following the COVID-19 pandemic and 832 patients who had biopsies before the pandemic were compared. The accuracy of the GLM was only 0.635. The AUC for categories no-cancer, low- and intermediate-risk, and very high-risk patients was 0.821, 0.716, and 0.926. With scaled relevance values, PSA was the most critical test. The two features that significantly influenced the treatment model prediction for PCa were biopsy PSA level and DRE, respectively.

Conclusion: Advanced age and a very high-risk group appear to have a detrimental impact on the results of biopsies conducted after the first wave of the COVID-19 era. At the same time, PSA levels and abnormal DRE are the most significant predictors in GLM.

新冠肺炎后前列腺癌诊断及以下模型的修改。
新冠肺炎疫情对前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗产生了影响。这项研究检查了任何可能指向未来模型的预测。方法:进行了两次中断时间序列分析:一次是在2017年1月至2019年12月期间进行的,另一次是在2022年期间进行的。收集所有患者的年龄、总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、直肠指检异常(DRE)、前列腺体积(PV)、既往活检阴性、活检阳性次数、Gleason评分和活检结果等信息。结果分类为无癌、不显著、中低、高风险和非常高风险PCa。采用广义线性模型(GLM)对结果进行建模。曲线下面积(AUC)和准确度用于评估多类别预测的执行情况。结果:将244例新冠肺炎大流行后活检患者与832例大流行前活检患者进行比较。GLM模型的精度仅为0.635。无癌、低、中危、高危患者的AUC分别为0.821、0.716、0.926。与尺度相关值,PSA是最关键的测试。两个显著影响PCa治疗模型预测的特征分别是活检PSA水平和DRE。结论:老年和高危人群似乎对第一波新冠疫情后的活检结果产生了不利影响。同时,PSA水平和DRE异常是GLM最显著的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信