{"title":"Using virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical students: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Rie Yamada, Kaori Futakawa, Kuangzhe Xu, Satoshi Kondo","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02793-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Empathy is a crucial skill that enhances the quality of patient care, reduces burnout among healthcare professionals, and fosters professionalism in medical students. Clinical practice and standardized patient-based education provide opportunities to enhance empathy, but a lack of consistency and reproducibility as well as significant dependency on resources are impediments. The COVID-19 pandemic has further restricted these opportunities, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. Virtual patients through standardized scenarios ensure consistency and reproducibility while offering safe, flexible, and repetitive learning opportunities unconstrained by time or location. Empathy education using virtual patients could serve as a temporary alternative during the COVID-19 pandemic and address the limitations of traditional face-to-face learning methods. This review aims to comprehensively map existing literature on the use of virtual patients in empathy education and identify research gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines and be reported according to PRISMA-P. The search strategy includes a comprehensive search across databases such as PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, Google, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar, covering both published and gray literature without language restrictions. Both quantitative and qualitative studies will be included. Two independent researchers will screen all titles/abstracts and full texts for eligibility. Data will be extracted to summarize definitions of empathy, characteristics of virtual patient scenarios, and methods for measuring their impact on empathy development. Results will be presented in narrative and tabular formats to highlight key findings and research gaps.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As this review analyzes existing literature, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be actively disseminated through academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications, providing educators and researchers with valuable insights into the potential of virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical education. This study goes beyond the mere synthesis of academic knowledge by contributing to the advancement of medical education and clinical practice by clarifying virtual patient scenario design and evaluation methods in empathy education. The findings provide a critical foundation for our ongoing development of a medical education platform aimed at enhancing empathy through the use of virtual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02793-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Empathy is a crucial skill that enhances the quality of patient care, reduces burnout among healthcare professionals, and fosters professionalism in medical students. Clinical practice and standardized patient-based education provide opportunities to enhance empathy, but a lack of consistency and reproducibility as well as significant dependency on resources are impediments. The COVID-19 pandemic has further restricted these opportunities, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. Virtual patients through standardized scenarios ensure consistency and reproducibility while offering safe, flexible, and repetitive learning opportunities unconstrained by time or location. Empathy education using virtual patients could serve as a temporary alternative during the COVID-19 pandemic and address the limitations of traditional face-to-face learning methods. This review aims to comprehensively map existing literature on the use of virtual patients in empathy education and identify research gaps.
Methods: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines and be reported according to PRISMA-P. The search strategy includes a comprehensive search across databases such as PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, Google, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar, covering both published and gray literature without language restrictions. Both quantitative and qualitative studies will be included. Two independent researchers will screen all titles/abstracts and full texts for eligibility. Data will be extracted to summarize definitions of empathy, characteristics of virtual patient scenarios, and methods for measuring their impact on empathy development. Results will be presented in narrative and tabular formats to highlight key findings and research gaps.
Discussion: As this review analyzes existing literature, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be actively disseminated through academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications, providing educators and researchers with valuable insights into the potential of virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical education. This study goes beyond the mere synthesis of academic knowledge by contributing to the advancement of medical education and clinical practice by clarifying virtual patient scenario design and evaluation methods in empathy education. The findings provide a critical foundation for our ongoing development of a medical education platform aimed at enhancing empathy through the use of virtual patients.
简介:移情是提高病人护理质量的关键技能,减少医疗保健专业人员的倦怠,培养医学生的专业精神。临床实践和标准化的以患者为本的教育为增强共情提供了机会,但缺乏一致性和可重复性以及对资源的严重依赖是障碍。2019冠状病毒病大流行进一步限制了这些机会,凸显了采取替代办法的必要性。通过标准化场景的虚拟患者确保一致性和可重复性,同时提供不受时间或地点限制的安全、灵活和重复的学习机会。在COVID-19大流行期间,利用虚拟患者进行移情教育可以作为一种临时替代方案,并解决传统面对面学习方法的局限性。本综述旨在全面梳理现有关于虚拟患者在共情教育中的应用的文献,并找出研究空白。方法:本综述将遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指南,并按照PRISMA-P报告。搜索策略包括对PubMed (MEDLINE)、CINAHL、Web of Science、Scopus、ERIC、谷歌、谷歌Scholar和Semantic Scholar等数据库的全面搜索,涵盖已发表文献和灰色文献,不受语言限制。将包括定量和定性研究。两名独立研究人员将对所有标题/摘要和全文进行筛选。将提取数据来总结共情的定义,虚拟患者场景的特征,以及测量它们对共情发展影响的方法。结果将以叙述和表格形式呈现,以突出主要发现和研究差距。讨论:由于本综述分析的是现有文献,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过学术会议和同行评议出版物积极传播,为教育工作者和研究人员提供有关虚拟患者潜力的宝贵见解,以增强医学教育中的同理心。本研究超越了单纯的学术知识的综合,通过阐明移情教育中的虚拟患者情景设计和评估方法,为医学教育和临床实践的进步做出了贡献。这些发现为我们正在进行的医学教育平台的开发提供了重要的基础,该平台旨在通过使用虚拟患者来增强同理心。
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.