The nature of syntactic working memory during relative clause processing: fMRI evidence from multiple anatomic ROIs

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Wenjia Zhang , Zhiqiang Yan , Jie Dong , Xinyi Liu , Aoke Zheng , Hong Liang , Hao Yan
{"title":"The nature of syntactic working memory during relative clause processing: fMRI evidence from multiple anatomic ROIs","authors":"Wenjia Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Yan ,&nbsp;Jie Dong ,&nbsp;Xinyi Liu ,&nbsp;Aoke Zheng ,&nbsp;Hong Liang ,&nbsp;Hao Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Relative clauses (RC) are a common embedded structure in natural language. They can be classified as Subject-extracted RC (SRC) and object-extracted RC (ORC). Previous studies have suggested an ORC advantage in Chinese. This is consistent with the memory-based theories, which propose that more syntactic working memory (SWM) is needed during the Chinese SRC processing than the ORC processing. However, it is still unclear about the nature of the SWM (language-specific vs. domain-general). In the current study, participants were asked to read Chinese SRC and ORC sentences while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning. Because of the important role of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) in SWM, these two brain regions were divided into sub-regions. Critically, LIFG<sub>orbital</sub> is more related to language-specific processing whereas LIFG<sub>opercular</sub> is more related to domain-general processing. Activation analyses and Granger causality (GC) analyses were both conducted. The results first provided more neurophysiological evidence of the ORC advantage in Chinese. More importantly, the results of activation analyses showed that LIFG<sub>oper</sub> was more activated in the contrast of SRC &gt; ORC. In contrast, the results of GC analyses showed that LIFG<sub>orb</sub> was more involved in the SRC-specific connectivity. Altogether, these results suggest that the SWM induced by the contrast of SRC &gt; ORC was related to both the language-specific and domain-general processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 109107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393225000429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relative clauses (RC) are a common embedded structure in natural language. They can be classified as Subject-extracted RC (SRC) and object-extracted RC (ORC). Previous studies have suggested an ORC advantage in Chinese. This is consistent with the memory-based theories, which propose that more syntactic working memory (SWM) is needed during the Chinese SRC processing than the ORC processing. However, it is still unclear about the nature of the SWM (language-specific vs. domain-general). In the current study, participants were asked to read Chinese SRC and ORC sentences while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning. Because of the important role of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) in SWM, these two brain regions were divided into sub-regions. Critically, LIFGorbital is more related to language-specific processing whereas LIFGopercular is more related to domain-general processing. Activation analyses and Granger causality (GC) analyses were both conducted. The results first provided more neurophysiological evidence of the ORC advantage in Chinese. More importantly, the results of activation analyses showed that LIFGoper was more activated in the contrast of SRC > ORC. In contrast, the results of GC analyses showed that LIFGorb was more involved in the SRC-specific connectivity. Altogether, these results suggest that the SWM induced by the contrast of SRC > ORC was related to both the language-specific and domain-general processing.
关系小句加工过程中句法工作记忆的性质:来自多个解剖roi的fMRI证据。
关系从句是自然语言中常见的嵌入式结构。可分为主体提取RC (subject - extraction RC)和客体提取RC (object- extraction RC)。先前的研究表明汉语有ORC优势。这与基于记忆的理论一致,该理论认为在汉语SRC加工过程中需要更多的句法工作记忆(SWM)。然而,SWM的本质(特定语言vs.通用领域)仍然不清楚。在目前的研究中,参与者被要求在进行功能磁共振成像(fMRI)扫描的同时阅读中文SRC和ORC句子。由于额下回(IFG)和颞上回(STG)在SWM中的重要作用,这两个脑区被划分为亚区。关键的是,lifgobital与特定语言的处理更相关,而lifgoperular与领域通用处理更相关。激活分析和格兰杰因果关系(GC)分析。研究结果首次为中国人的ORC优势提供了更多的神经生理学证据。更重要的是,激活分析结果显示,与SRC > ORC相比,LIFGoper的激活程度更高。相比之下,GC分析结果显示LIFGorb更多地参与src特异性连接。综上所述,这些结果表明,由SRC > ORC对比引起的SWM与语言特定加工和领域通用加工都有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信