Shahaan S Razak, Fabricio Garcia-Torrico, Caitlyn J Smith, Amal H Khiralla, Soneesh Kothagundla, Diana L Ochoa Hernandez, Bryan D Choi, Ganesh M Shankar, Mohammad A Aziz-Sultan, Brian V Nahed
{"title":"Telerehabilitation and cost analysis in global neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 40,537 patients.","authors":"Shahaan S Razak, Fabricio Garcia-Torrico, Caitlyn J Smith, Amal H Khiralla, Soneesh Kothagundla, Diana L Ochoa Hernandez, Bryan D Choi, Ganesh M Shankar, Mohammad A Aziz-Sultan, Brian V Nahed","doi":"10.3171/2024.12.FOCUS24830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative rehabilitation is crucial for neurosurgical patients' rehabilitation, but access in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is often limited. Telerehabilitation offers a cost-effective, accessible alternative by providing remote therapy through digital platforms. This study compared telerehabilitation with traditional methods in LMICs, focusing on cost-effectiveness, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, with searches across PubMed, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they focused on telerehabilitation for neurosurgical patients in LMICs and assessed cost-effectiveness or cost savings, along with clinical outcomes. Data extraction and quality assessments were performed using Covidence, with risk of bias evaluations conducted with the ROBINS-I tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors' review included 20 studies with 40,537 neurosurgical patients, demonstrating telemedicine's role in patient care, from initial consultations to postoperative follow-ups. Cost analysis revealed specific savings such as $61.80 per patient in India for neurosurgical follow-ups, $888 to $1501 per visit in the US for patients from underserved areas, and $3.8 million in stroke and injury care in France. Patient satisfaction showed an average rate of 97% (95% CI 94%-98%, p = 0.06). Additionally, the combined analysis estimated an 88% probability of achieving a favorable outcome (95% CI 68%-96%, p < 0.01). Intervention efficiency revealed a rate of 97% (95% CI 96%-99%, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telerehabilitation in neurosurgical care for LMICs offers a transformative solution, dramatically reducing healthcare costs, improving access, and maintaining the quality of care. With proven effectiveness across large patient populations, telemedicine bridges critical gaps in neurosurgical treatment, highlighting an urgent global need to scale its implementation. This technology could revolutionize healthcare in resource-limited settings, mitigating the geographic, financial, and infrastructural barriers that have long hindered equitable neurosurgical care worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 3","pages":"E8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.FOCUS24830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Postoperative rehabilitation is crucial for neurosurgical patients' rehabilitation, but access in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is often limited. Telerehabilitation offers a cost-effective, accessible alternative by providing remote therapy through digital platforms. This study compared telerehabilitation with traditional methods in LMICs, focusing on cost-effectiveness, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, with searches across PubMed, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they focused on telerehabilitation for neurosurgical patients in LMICs and assessed cost-effectiveness or cost savings, along with clinical outcomes. Data extraction and quality assessments were performed using Covidence, with risk of bias evaluations conducted with the ROBINS-I tool.
Results: The authors' review included 20 studies with 40,537 neurosurgical patients, demonstrating telemedicine's role in patient care, from initial consultations to postoperative follow-ups. Cost analysis revealed specific savings such as $61.80 per patient in India for neurosurgical follow-ups, $888 to $1501 per visit in the US for patients from underserved areas, and $3.8 million in stroke and injury care in France. Patient satisfaction showed an average rate of 97% (95% CI 94%-98%, p = 0.06). Additionally, the combined analysis estimated an 88% probability of achieving a favorable outcome (95% CI 68%-96%, p < 0.01). Intervention efficiency revealed a rate of 97% (95% CI 96%-99%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Telerehabilitation in neurosurgical care for LMICs offers a transformative solution, dramatically reducing healthcare costs, improving access, and maintaining the quality of care. With proven effectiveness across large patient populations, telemedicine bridges critical gaps in neurosurgical treatment, highlighting an urgent global need to scale its implementation. This technology could revolutionize healthcare in resource-limited settings, mitigating the geographic, financial, and infrastructural barriers that have long hindered equitable neurosurgical care worldwide.
目的:术后康复对神经外科患者的康复至关重要,但在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),获得康复的机会往往有限。远程康复通过数字平台提供远程治疗,提供了一种成本效益高、可获得的替代方案。本研究比较了中低收入国家的远程康复与传统方法,重点关注成本效益、临床结果和患者满意度。方法:使用PRISMA指南进行系统评价,检索PubMed、Embase、IEEE explore和Web of Science。如果研究的重点是中低收入国家神经外科患者的远程康复,并评估成本效益或成本节约,以及临床结果,则纳入研究。使用covid - ence进行数据提取和质量评估,使用ROBINS-I工具进行偏倚风险评估。结果:作者回顾了20项涉及40,537例神经外科患者的研究,证明了远程医疗在患者护理中的作用,从最初的咨询到术后随访。成本分析显示,在印度,神经外科随访的每位患者节省了61.8美元,在美国,医疗服务不足地区的患者每次就诊节省了888至1501美元,在法国,中风和损伤护理节省了380万美元。患者满意度平均为97% (95% CI 94% ~ 98%, p = 0.06)。此外,联合分析估计获得有利结果的概率为88% (95% CI 68%-96%, p < 0.01)。干预有效率为97% (95% CI 96%-99%, p < 0.0001)。结论:中低收入人群神经外科护理中的远程康复提供了一种变革性的解决方案,显著降低了医疗成本,改善了可及性,并保持了护理质量。远程医疗在大量患者群体中证明了有效性,填补了神经外科治疗的关键空白,突出了全球迫切需要扩大其实施规模。这项技术可以在资源有限的环境下彻底改变医疗保健,减轻长期以来阻碍全球公平神经外科护理的地理、财务和基础设施障碍。