Regular Positive Human Contacts Do Not Improve Pigs' Response to a Lipopolysaccharide Immune Challenge.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Neuroimmunomodulation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1159/000544748
Oceane Schmitt, Christian Knecht, Birgit Sobczak, Hana Volkmann, Ulrike Gimsa, Jean-Loup Rault
{"title":"Regular Positive Human Contacts Do Not Improve Pigs' Response to a Lipopolysaccharide Immune Challenge.","authors":"Oceane Schmitt, Christian Knecht, Birgit Sobczak, Hana Volkmann, Ulrike Gimsa, Jean-Loup Rault","doi":"10.1159/000544748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about the effects of a positive human-animal relationship on animal health and resilience. This study investigated the effects of regular positive human-animal interactions on pigs' response to an immune challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four female pigs were recruited at weaning (5 weeks old), and siblings of similar weights were allocated to either the positive contact treatment with positive contacts given by a human to groups of 3 pigs in their home pen or the control treatment only exposed to a human standing immobile and silently in front and outside their home pen. Treatment sessions were applied over 9 consecutive weeks, lasted 10 min per group, and occurred twice daily (morning and afternoon), 3 days a week. At 16 weeks of age, pigs were submitted to an immune challenge, which consisted of a single intravenous administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 2 µg/kg). The sickness behaviours of pigs were observed using scan sampling every 5 min over 6 h post-administration, recording somnolence, vomiting, diarrhoea, cramping, shivering, and panting. Blood samples were taken before the LPS administration, after 1 h and 3 h. Blood plasma was analysed to quantify tumour necrosis factor alpha, interleukins 6 and 10, immunoglobulin A, and cortisol concentrations, and blood serum was analysed to quantify a brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Behavioural and physiological data were statistically analysed using general linear models in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatments showed signs of sickness behaviour following LPS administration, but the two treatments did not differ in the frequency, severity of sickness behaviours, or length of recovery or in the blood plasma concentration of cytokines and cortisol measured.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Therefore, regular exposure to positive contacts with a human over several weeks, although leading to the development of a positive human-animal relationship, did not enhance the pigs' response to this immune challenge or the immune parameters measured in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19133,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimmunomodulation","volume":" ","pages":"83-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimmunomodulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about the effects of a positive human-animal relationship on animal health and resilience. This study investigated the effects of regular positive human-animal interactions on pigs' response to an immune challenge.

Methods: Twenty-four female pigs were recruited at weaning (5 weeks old), and siblings of similar weights were allocated to either the positive contact treatment with positive contacts given by a human to groups of 3 pigs in their home pen or the control treatment only exposed to a human standing immobile and silently in front and outside their home pen. Treatment sessions were applied over 9 consecutive weeks, lasted 10 min per group, and occurred twice daily (morning and afternoon), 3 days a week. At 16 weeks of age, pigs were submitted to an immune challenge, which consisted of a single intravenous administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 2 µg/kg). The sickness behaviours of pigs were observed using scan sampling every 5 min over 6 h post-administration, recording somnolence, vomiting, diarrhoea, cramping, shivering, and panting. Blood samples were taken before the LPS administration, after 1 h and 3 h. Blood plasma was analysed to quantify tumour necrosis factor alpha, interleukins 6 and 10, immunoglobulin A, and cortisol concentrations, and blood serum was analysed to quantify a brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Behavioural and physiological data were statistically analysed using general linear models in R.

Results: Both treatments showed signs of sickness behaviour following LPS administration, but the two treatments did not differ in the frequency, severity of sickness behaviours, or length of recovery or in the blood plasma concentration of cytokines and cortisol measured.

Conclusion: Therefore, regular exposure to positive contacts with a human over several weeks, although leading to the development of a positive human-animal relationship, did not enhance the pigs' response to this immune challenge or the immune parameters measured in this study.

导言:人们对积极的人与动物关系对动物健康和恢复能力的影响知之甚少。本研究调查了定期积极的人与动物互动对猪对免疫挑战反应的影响:24头雌性猪在断奶时(5周大)被招募,体重相近的兄弟姐妹被分配到积极接触疗法中,由人类在猪圈中对每3头猪进行积极接触;或者分配到对照疗法中,只让人类静静地站在猪圈前和猪圈外。治疗连续进行九周,每组持续 10 分钟,每天两次(上午和下午),每周三天。猪在 16 周大时接受免疫挑战,包括单次静脉注射脂多糖(LPS;2µg/kg)。在给药后的 6 小时内,每隔 5 分钟扫描取样一次,观察猪的生病行为,记录嗜睡、呕吐、腹泻、痉挛、颤抖和喘气。在注射 LPS 前、1 小时后和 3 小时后采集血液样本。分析血浆以量化肿瘤坏死因子α、白细胞介素6和10、免疫球蛋白A和皮质醇的浓度,分析血清以量化脑源性神经营养因子。使用 R 软件中的一般线性模型对行为和生理数据进行了统计分析:结果:两种治疗方法在给予 LPS 后都出现了病态行为,但两种治疗方法在病态行为的频率、严重程度或恢复时间,以及所测得的细胞因子和皮质醇的血浆浓度方面没有差异:因此,在数周内定期与人进行积极接触,虽然会促进人与动物之间积极关系的发展,但并不会增强猪对这种免疫挑战的反应,也不会提高本研究测量的免疫参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroimmunomodulation
Neuroimmunomodulation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly expanding area of research known as neuroimmunomodulation explores the way in which the nervous system interacts with the immune system via neural, hormonal, and paracrine actions. Encompassing both basic and clinical research, ''Neuroimmunomodulation'' reports on all aspects of these interactions. Basic investigations consider all neural and humoral networks from molecular genetics through cell regulation to integrative systems of the body. The journal also aims to clarify the basic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the CNS pathology in AIDS patients and in various neurodegenerative diseases. Although primarily devoted to research articles, timely reviews are published on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信