Outcomes of deep brain stimulation surgery in the management of dystonia in glutaric aciduria type 1.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daniel E Lumsden, Stavros Tsagkaris, Jon Cleary, Michael Champion, Helen Mundy, Abteen Mostofi, Harutomo Hasegawa, Verity M McClelland, Shakya Bhattacharjee, Monty Silverdale, Hortensia Gimeno, Keyoumars Ashkan, Richard Selway, Margaret Kaminska, Alexander Hammers, Jean-Pierre Lin
{"title":"Outcomes of deep brain stimulation surgery in the management of dystonia in glutaric aciduria type 1.","authors":"Daniel E Lumsden, Stavros Tsagkaris, Jon Cleary, Michael Champion, Helen Mundy, Abteen Mostofi, Harutomo Hasegawa, Verity M McClelland, Shakya Bhattacharjee, Monty Silverdale, Hortensia Gimeno, Keyoumars Ashkan, Richard Selway, Margaret Kaminska, Alexander Hammers, Jean-Pierre Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12942-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare autosomal recessive organic acidaemia caused by deficiency of the glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase enzyme. We describe the outcomes following deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the management of dystonia of children and adults with glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases with GA1 were identified from the institutional databases of two tertiary movement disorder services. Data were extracted from clinical records using a standardised proforma, including baseline clinical characteristics, imaging and neurophysiological findings, complications post-surgery, and outcomes as measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BMFDRS) motor scores and the Canadian Occupation Performance Measure (COPM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 children were identified aged 3-17.5 with a median age of 11.5 years at neurosurgery, and one adult undergoing DBS aged 31 years. Baseline BMFDRS motor score ranged from 58.5-114, median 105. GMFCS-equivalence level was 5 (i.e. non-ambulant) for 10/16 cases. Surgery was tolerated in all cases without evidence of metabolic decompensation. BFMDRS motor score 1-year post-surgery ranged from 57.5-108.5 (median 97.25) and at last follow-up 57.5-112 (median 104) (no statistically significant change compared to baseline at either time point, P > 0.05). COPM data were available for 11/13 children and young people (CAYP). Clinically significant improvement was reported in 7/11 at 1 year and 8/11 at last follow-up. Four CAYP transitioned to adult services. Death occurred in three cases during follow-up, in no case related to DBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DBS may be considered as a management option for children with GA1 who have appropriately selected goals for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"234"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12942-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare autosomal recessive organic acidaemia caused by deficiency of the glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase enzyme. We describe the outcomes following deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the management of dystonia of children and adults with glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1).

Methods: Cases with GA1 were identified from the institutional databases of two tertiary movement disorder services. Data were extracted from clinical records using a standardised proforma, including baseline clinical characteristics, imaging and neurophysiological findings, complications post-surgery, and outcomes as measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BMFDRS) motor scores and the Canadian Occupation Performance Measure (COPM).

Results: A total of 15 children were identified aged 3-17.5 with a median age of 11.5 years at neurosurgery, and one adult undergoing DBS aged 31 years. Baseline BMFDRS motor score ranged from 58.5-114, median 105. GMFCS-equivalence level was 5 (i.e. non-ambulant) for 10/16 cases. Surgery was tolerated in all cases without evidence of metabolic decompensation. BFMDRS motor score 1-year post-surgery ranged from 57.5-108.5 (median 97.25) and at last follow-up 57.5-112 (median 104) (no statistically significant change compared to baseline at either time point, P > 0.05). COPM data were available for 11/13 children and young people (CAYP). Clinically significant improvement was reported in 7/11 at 1 year and 8/11 at last follow-up. Four CAYP transitioned to adult services. Death occurred in three cases during follow-up, in no case related to DBS.

Conclusion: DBS may be considered as a management option for children with GA1 who have appropriately selected goals for intervention.

脑深部电刺激手术治疗1型戊二酸尿肌张力障碍的疗效。
目的:戊二酸尿症 1 型(GA1)是一种罕见的常染色体隐性遗传有机酸血症,由戊二酰-CoA 脱氢酶缺乏引起。我们描述了对患有戊二酸尿症 1 型(GA1)的儿童和成人进行脑深部刺激(DBS)治疗肌张力障碍的结果:方法:从两家三级运动障碍服务机构的机构数据库中找出患有谷丙转氨酶尿症1型(GA1)的病例。采用标准化表格从临床记录中提取数据,包括基线临床特征、影像学和神经生理学检查结果、手术后并发症以及通过伯克-法恩-马斯登肌张力障碍评分量表(BMFDRS)运动评分和加拿大职业表现测量(COPM)测量的结果:共有 15 名儿童接受了神经外科手术,年龄在 3-17.5 岁之间,中位年龄为 11.5 岁,还有一名接受 DBS 治疗的成人,年龄为 31 岁。基线 BMFDRS 运动评分范围为 58.5-114 分,中位数为 105 分。10/16例患者的GMFCS等效水平为5级(即不能行走)。所有病例均能耐受手术,无代谢失代偿迹象。术后 1 年的 BFMDRS 运动评分为 57.5-108.5(中位数为 97.25),最后一次随访时的评分为 57.5-112(中位数为 104)(两个时间点与基线相比均无统计学意义上的显著变化,P > 0.05)。有 11/13 名儿童和青少年(CAYP)提供了 COPM 数据。据报告,7/11 名儿童和青少年的病情在 1 年后有明显改善,8/11 名儿童和青少年的病情在最后一次随访时有明显改善。有 4 名儿童和青少年转到了成人服务机构。随访期间有 3 例死亡病例,其中没有一例与 DBS 有关:结论:对于有适当干预目标的 GA1 患儿,可以考虑将 DBS 作为一种管理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信