Training Parameters and Adaptations that Mediate Walking Capacity Gains from High-Intensity Gait Training Post-Stroke.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Pierce Boyne, Allison Miller, Sarah M Schwab-Farrell, Heidi Sucharew, Daniel Carl, Sandra A Billinger, Darcy S Reisman
{"title":"Training Parameters and Adaptations that Mediate Walking Capacity Gains from High-Intensity Gait Training Post-Stroke.","authors":"Pierce Boyne, Allison Miller, Sarah M Schwab-Farrell, Heidi Sucharew, Daniel Carl, Sandra A Billinger, Darcy S Reisman","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Locomotor high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to improve walking capacity (speed and endurance) more than moderate-intensity aerobic training (MAT) after stroke, but it is unclear which training parameter(s) should be prioritized (e.g. speed, heart rate, blood lactate, step count) and to what extent walking capacity gains are the result of gait changes versus cardiorespiratory adaptations. This study aimed to assess which training parameters and longitudinal adaptations most strongly mediate 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) gains from post-stroke HIIT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HIT-Stroke Trial randomized 55 persons with chronic stroke and walking limitations to HIIT or MAT; each involving overground and treadmill walking, 45 minutes, 3 times/week for 12 weeks. HIIT used short maximum speed intervals, targeting >60% heart rate reserve (HRR). MAT targeted 40-60% HRR. Blinded outcomes included 6MWD, short-distance gait function (e.g. fastest 10-meter gait speed) and aerobic capacity (e.g. ventilatory threshold). This ancillary analysis used structural equation models to compare mediating effects of different training parameters and longitudinal adaptations on 6MWD changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Net gains in 6MWD from HIIT versus MAT were primarily mediated by faster training speeds (+57 meters, p < .0001) and longitudinal gait adaptations (+37 meters, p = .0005). Training step count was also positively associated with 6MWD gains, but was lower with HIIT versus MAT, which decreased the net 6MWD gain from HIIT (-14 meters, p = .02). HIIT generated higher training heart rate and lactate than MAT, but aerobic capacity gains were similar between groups, and 6MWD changes were not associated with training heart rate, training lactate, or aerobic adaptations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To increase walking capacity with post-stroke HIIT, training speed and step count appear to be the most important parameters to prioritize.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Locomotor high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to improve walking capacity (speed and endurance) more than moderate-intensity aerobic training (MAT) after stroke, but it is unclear which training parameter(s) should be prioritized (e.g. speed, heart rate, blood lactate, step count) and to what extent walking capacity gains are the result of gait changes versus cardiorespiratory adaptations. This study aimed to assess which training parameters and longitudinal adaptations most strongly mediate 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) gains from post-stroke HIIT.

Methods: The HIT-Stroke Trial randomized 55 persons with chronic stroke and walking limitations to HIIT or MAT; each involving overground and treadmill walking, 45 minutes, 3 times/week for 12 weeks. HIIT used short maximum speed intervals, targeting >60% heart rate reserve (HRR). MAT targeted 40-60% HRR. Blinded outcomes included 6MWD, short-distance gait function (e.g. fastest 10-meter gait speed) and aerobic capacity (e.g. ventilatory threshold). This ancillary analysis used structural equation models to compare mediating effects of different training parameters and longitudinal adaptations on 6MWD changes.

Results: Net gains in 6MWD from HIIT versus MAT were primarily mediated by faster training speeds (+57 meters, p < .0001) and longitudinal gait adaptations (+37 meters, p = .0005). Training step count was also positively associated with 6MWD gains, but was lower with HIIT versus MAT, which decreased the net 6MWD gain from HIIT (-14 meters, p = .02). HIIT generated higher training heart rate and lactate than MAT, but aerobic capacity gains were similar between groups, and 6MWD changes were not associated with training heart rate, training lactate, or aerobic adaptations.

Conclusions: To increase walking capacity with post-stroke HIIT, training speed and step count appear to be the most important parameters to prioritize.

中风后高强度步态训练提高行走能力的训练参数和适应性。
目的:运动性高强度间歇训练(HIIT)比中强度有氧训练(MAT)更能提高中风后的步行能力(速度和耐力),但目前尚不清楚应优先考虑哪些训练参数(如速度、心率、血乳酸、步数),以及步行能力的提高在多大程度上是步态变化相对于心肺适应的结果。本研究旨在评估哪些训练参数和纵向适应最能促进卒中后HIIT训练带来的6分钟步行距离(6MWD)的提高:方法:HIT-中风试验将 55 名患有慢性中风且行走受限的患者随机分为 HIIT 或 MAT 两组,每组包括地面行走和跑步机行走,每组 45 分钟,每周 3 次,持续 12 周。HIIT 采用短时间最高速度间隔,目标是心率储备(HRR)>60%。MAT 以 40-60% 的心率储备为目标。盲测结果包括 6MWD、短距离步态功能(如最快 10 米步态速度)和有氧能力(如通气阈值)。这项辅助分析使用结构方程模型来比较不同训练参数和纵向适应对 6MWD 变化的中介效应:结果:HIIT 与 MAT 相比,6MWD 的净收益主要受较快的训练速度(+57 米,p < .0001)和纵向步态适应(+37 米,p = .0005)的影响。训练步数也与 6MWD 增益呈正相关,但 HIIT 相对于 MAT 的训练步数较低,这降低了 HIIT 的 6MWD 净增益(-14 米,p = .02)。HIIT 比 MAT 产生更高的训练心率和乳酸,但有氧能力的提高在各组之间相似,6MWD 的变化与训练心率、训练乳酸或有氧适应性无关:结论:要通过卒中后 HIIT 提高步行能力,训练速度和步数似乎是最重要的优先参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信