Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid for Hypercholesterolemia in Japan: A Phase 2 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Finding Trial.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Shizuya Yamashita, Hitomi Fujita, Daisuke Yokota, Yuki Morikawa-Isogai, Ryuki Kitamoto
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid for Hypercholesterolemia in Japan: A Phase 2 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Finding Trial.","authors":"Shizuya Yamashita, Hitomi Fujita, Daisuke Yokota, Yuki Morikawa-Isogai, Ryuki Kitamoto","doi":"10.5551/jat.65336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid, an ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor, at doses of 60, 120, and 180 mg, administered for 12 weeks in conjunction with ongoing treatments (e.g., statin and/or other lipid-modifying therapy) and determined the phase 3 trial dosage in Japanese patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b trial included patients with hypercholesterolemia at risk for cardiovascular events and an inadequate response to statins/statin intolerance. The percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to week 12 was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bempedoic acid 60 mg, 120 mg, 180 mg, and placebo groups included 47, 46, 48, and 47 patients, respectively; 79% of patients had an inadequate response to statins and 21% had statin intolerance. Relative to placebo (-1.9%), LDL-C reduction from baseline to week 12 was significantly greater in the bempedoic acid treatment groups (least squares mean: 60 mg, -10.6%; 120 mg, -21.9%; 180 mg, -21.3%; p<0.01 vs. placebo). Patients with an inadequate response and statin intolerance who were treated with bempedoic acid showed improved LDL-C levels by week 12. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was higher in the bempedoic acid-treated groups (60 mg, 57.4%; 120 mg, 54.3%; and 180 mg, 58.3%) than in the placebo group (38.3%). There was no increasing trend with increasing doses. Adverse events related to muscular and hepatic disorders were infrequent, and no new or worsening cases of diabetes were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in Japanese patients with elevated LDL-C levels were confirmed. The 180 mg dosage of bempedoic acid was found to be appropriate for a Japanese phase 3 trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.65336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid, an ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor, at doses of 60, 120, and 180 mg, administered for 12 weeks in conjunction with ongoing treatments (e.g., statin and/or other lipid-modifying therapy) and determined the phase 3 trial dosage in Japanese patients.

Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b trial included patients with hypercholesterolemia at risk for cardiovascular events and an inadequate response to statins/statin intolerance. The percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to week 12 was calculated.

Results: The bempedoic acid 60 mg, 120 mg, 180 mg, and placebo groups included 47, 46, 48, and 47 patients, respectively; 79% of patients had an inadequate response to statins and 21% had statin intolerance. Relative to placebo (-1.9%), LDL-C reduction from baseline to week 12 was significantly greater in the bempedoic acid treatment groups (least squares mean: 60 mg, -10.6%; 120 mg, -21.9%; 180 mg, -21.3%; p<0.01 vs. placebo). Patients with an inadequate response and statin intolerance who were treated with bempedoic acid showed improved LDL-C levels by week 12. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was higher in the bempedoic acid-treated groups (60 mg, 57.4%; 120 mg, 54.3%; and 180 mg, 58.3%) than in the placebo group (38.3%). There was no increasing trend with increasing doses. Adverse events related to muscular and hepatic disorders were infrequent, and no new or worsening cases of diabetes were reported.

Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in Japanese patients with elevated LDL-C levels were confirmed. The 180 mg dosage of bempedoic acid was found to be appropriate for a Japanese phase 3 trial.

鱼腥草酸治疗日本高胆固醇血症的有效性和安全性:一项 2 期多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、剂量调查试验。
目的:我们评估了苯戊酸(一种atp -柠檬酸裂解酶抑制剂)的疗效和安全性,剂量分别为60mg、120mg和180mg,与正在进行的治疗(如他汀类药物和/或其他脂质调节治疗)联合使用12周,并确定了日本患者的3期试验剂量。方法:这项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、2b期试验纳入了有心血管事件风险且对他汀类药物/他汀类药物不耐受反应不足的高胆固醇血症患者。计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)从基线到第12周的百分比变化。结果:苯戊酸60mg、120mg、180mg组和安慰剂组分别有47例、46例、48例和47例患者;79%的患者对他汀类药物反应不足,21%的患者有他汀类药物不耐受。相对于安慰剂组(-1.9%),甲戊二酸治疗组从基线到第12周LDL-C的降低显著更大(最小二乘平均值:60 mg, -10.6%;120毫克,-21.9%;180毫克,-21.3%;P <0.01与安慰剂比较)。对于反应不足和他汀类药物不耐受的患者,用苯戊酸治疗后,在第12周LDL-C水平得到改善。治疗后出现的不良事件发生率在苯甲醚酸治疗组较高(60 mg, 57.4%;120毫克,54.3%;180毫克,58.3%)比安慰剂组(38.3%)。随着剂量的增加,无增加趋势。与肌肉和肝脏疾病相关的不良事件很少发生,没有新的或恶化的糖尿病病例报告。结论:本品对日本LDL-C升高患者的疗效和安全性得到了证实。在日本进行的3期临床试验中,发现180mg的剂量是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
15.90%
发文量
271
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: JAT publishes articles focused on all aspects of research on atherosclerosis, vascular biology, thrombosis, lipid and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信