Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Imputing Response Rates for First-Line Psychological Treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Youth.

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Katie Lofthouse, Alana Davies, Joanne Hodgekins, Richard Meiser-Stedman
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Imputing Response Rates for First-Line Psychological Treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Youth.","authors":"Katie Lofthouse, Alana Davies, Joanne Hodgekins, Richard Meiser-Stedman","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Meta-analyses assessing psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in youth have demonstrated their effectiveness using standardized mean differences. Imputation of response rates (ie, 50% or greater reduction in symptoms) may facilitate easier interpretation for clinicians.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched 4 databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PTSDPubs, and Web of Science) and screened 1,654 records to include 60 randomized controlled trials (52 trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy [TF-CBT], 8 eye movement desensitization [EMDR]) with a total of 5,113 participants, comparing psychological therapies for PTSD against control conditions in youth. Data from randomized controlled trials of EMDR and TF-CBT for PTSD were used to impute response rates, establishing how many patients display 50% reduction, 20% reduction, and reliable improvement and deterioration (using reliable change indices) in PTSD and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of youth exhibiting a 50% reduction in PTSD symptoms was 0.48 (95% CI = 0.41-0.55) for TF-CBT, 0.30 (0.24-0.37) for EMDR, and 0.46 (0.39-0.52) for all psychological therapies, compared to 0.20 (0.16-0.24) for youth in control conditions. Reliable improvement was displayed by 0.53 (0.45-0.61; TF-CBT 0.55 [0.46-0.64], EMDR 0.42[0.30-0.55]) of youth receiving psychological therapies, compared to 0.25 (0.20-0.30) of youth in control conditions. Reliable deterioration was seen in 0.01 (0.01-0.02) of youth receiving psychological therapies, compared to 0.13 (0.08-0.20) of youth in control conditions. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychological therapies, in particular TF-CBT, for young people with PTSD are effective and unlikely to cause deterioration, with around half of youth receiving TF-CBT exhibiting 50% symptom reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.12.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Meta-analyses assessing psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in youth have demonstrated their effectiveness using standardized mean differences. Imputation of response rates (ie, 50% or greater reduction in symptoms) may facilitate easier interpretation for clinicians.

Method: We searched 4 databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PTSDPubs, and Web of Science) and screened 1,654 records to include 60 randomized controlled trials (52 trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy [TF-CBT], 8 eye movement desensitization [EMDR]) with a total of 5,113 participants, comparing psychological therapies for PTSD against control conditions in youth. Data from randomized controlled trials of EMDR and TF-CBT for PTSD were used to impute response rates, establishing how many patients display 50% reduction, 20% reduction, and reliable improvement and deterioration (using reliable change indices) in PTSD and depression.

Results: The proportion of youth exhibiting a 50% reduction in PTSD symptoms was 0.48 (95% CI = 0.41-0.55) for TF-CBT, 0.30 (0.24-0.37) for EMDR, and 0.46 (0.39-0.52) for all psychological therapies, compared to 0.20 (0.16-0.24) for youth in control conditions. Reliable improvement was displayed by 0.53 (0.45-0.61; TF-CBT 0.55 [0.46-0.64], EMDR 0.42[0.30-0.55]) of youth receiving psychological therapies, compared to 0.25 (0.20-0.30) of youth in control conditions. Reliable deterioration was seen in 0.01 (0.01-0.02) of youth receiving psychological therapies, compared to 0.13 (0.08-0.20) of youth in control conditions. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the included studies.

Conclusion: Psychological therapies, in particular TF-CBT, for young people with PTSD are effective and unlikely to cause deterioration, with around half of youth receiving TF-CBT exhibiting 50% symptom reduction.

系统回顾与荟萃分析:青少年创伤后应激障碍一线心理治疗的归因率。
目的:对青少年创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的心理治疗进行meta分析,使用标准化平均差异证明了其有效性。假设反应率(即症状减少50%或更多)可能有助于临床医生更容易地解释。方法:我们检索了MEDLINE、PsycINFO、ptsdbars和Web of Science四个数据库,筛选了1654项记录,包括60项随机对照试验(52项以创伤为重点的认知行为疗法[TF-CBT], 8项眼动脱敏[EMDR]),共有5113名参与者比较了青少年PTSD的心理治疗与对照条件。EMDR和TF-CBT治疗PTSD的随机对照试验数据用于估算反应率,确定有多少患者在PTSD和抑郁症中表现出50%的减少、20%的减少以及可靠的改善和恶化(使用可靠的变化指数)。结果:表现出PTSD症状减少50%的青少年比例,TF-CBT组为0.48 (95% CI: 0.41 - 0.55), EMDR组为0.30(0.24 - 0.37),所有心理治疗组为0.46(0.39 - 0.52),而对照组为0.20(0.16-0.24)。可靠改善为0.53 (0.45-0.61;Tf-cbt .55[.46]。接受心理治疗的青少年的EMDR为0.42[.30-.55],而对照组的EMDR为0.25(.20-.30)。接受心理治疗的青少年的可靠恶化率为0.01(0.01 - 0.02),而对照组的可靠恶化率为0.13(0.08 - 0.20)。在纳入的研究中存在高度的异质性。结论:心理疗法,特别是TF-CBT,对患有PTSD的年轻人是有效的,不太可能导致恶化,大约一半接受TF-CBT的年轻人表现出50%的症状减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信