Continuous glucose monitoring with low-glucose alerts in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes: A randomized crossover study.

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ryutaro Maeda, Takeshi Onoue, Keigo Mizutani, Koji Suzuki, Tomoko Handa, Tomoko Kobayashi, Shintaro Iwama, Takashi Miyata, Mariko Sugiyama, Daisuke Hagiwara, Hidetaka Suga, Fumie Kinoshita, Hiroshi Arima
{"title":"Continuous glucose monitoring with low-glucose alerts in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes: A randomized crossover study.","authors":"Ryutaro Maeda, Takeshi Onoue, Keigo Mizutani, Koji Suzuki, Tomoko Handa, Tomoko Kobayashi, Shintaro Iwama, Takashi Miyata, Mariko Sugiyama, Daisuke Hagiwara, Hidetaka Suga, Fumie Kinoshita, Hiroshi Arima","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with low-glucose alerts for preventing hypoglycemia in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, open-label, randomized crossover study involved 30 insulin-treated participants with diabetes who drove cars at least thrice weekly in Japan. Participants underwent two 4-week periods: an alert period using CGM with active low-glucose alerts and a no-alert period using blinded CGM without low-glucose alerts, separated by an eight-week washout period. The primary outcome was the percentage of time below range (TBR; <3.9 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven of the 30 participants completed the CGM analysis. Although the TBR did not differ between the alert and no-alert periods among all participants, it significantly decreased during the alert period compared with the no-alert period among the participants with type 1 diabetes (-4.4 [95 % confidence interval - 8.7, -0.08]%, p = 0.047). The incidence of low-glucose when driving was significantly lower during the alert period than during the no-alert period (19 % vs. 33 %, p = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-glucose alerts improved the TBR in drivers with type 1 diabetes and reduced the incidence of low-glucose while driving among all insulin-treated drivers, suggesting that these alerts may ensure the safety of insulin-treated drivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":"112074"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with low-glucose alerts for preventing hypoglycemia in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes.

Methods: This single-center, open-label, randomized crossover study involved 30 insulin-treated participants with diabetes who drove cars at least thrice weekly in Japan. Participants underwent two 4-week periods: an alert period using CGM with active low-glucose alerts and a no-alert period using blinded CGM without low-glucose alerts, separated by an eight-week washout period. The primary outcome was the percentage of time below range (TBR; <3.9 mmol/L).

Results: Twenty-seven of the 30 participants completed the CGM analysis. Although the TBR did not differ between the alert and no-alert periods among all participants, it significantly decreased during the alert period compared with the no-alert period among the participants with type 1 diabetes (-4.4 [95 % confidence interval - 8.7, -0.08]%, p = 0.047). The incidence of low-glucose when driving was significantly lower during the alert period than during the no-alert period (19 % vs. 33 %, p = 0.041).

Conclusion: Low-glucose alerts improved the TBR in drivers with type 1 diabetes and reduced the incidence of low-glucose while driving among all insulin-treated drivers, suggesting that these alerts may ensure the safety of insulin-treated drivers.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信