68 Ga-Pentixafor PET in Combination With MRI Improves the Differential Diagnosis of Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Clinical Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1097/RLU.0000000000005657
Zhenying Chen, Huimin Liu, Apeng Yang, Jingwei Liao, Zanyi Wu, Junmin Chen, Weibing Miao
{"title":"68 Ga-Pentixafor PET in Combination With MRI Improves the Differential Diagnosis of Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.","authors":"Zhenying Chen, Huimin Liu, Apeng Yang, Jingwei Liao, Zanyi Wu, Junmin Chen, Weibing Miao","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposes: </strong>This study aims to investigate the diagnostic performance of combining 68 Ga-pentixafor PET with MRI to differentiate primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from glioblastoma (GBM), particularly focusing on atypical lymphoma identification.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Seventy-one PCNSL and 53 GBM patients who underwent both 68 Ga-pentixafor PET/CT and MRI were retrospectively included. We evaluated the quantitative imaging parameters and MRI features of positive lesions, identifying atypical PCNSL by hemorrhage, necrosis, or heterogeneous enhancement. Logistic regression identified key variables, and the ROC-AUC evaluated their diagnostic value. Immunohistochemistry for CXCR4 was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCNSLs, including 23 atypical cases, showed higher SUV max and TBR, and lower MTV, ADC min , and relative ADC min (rADC min ) than GBMs (all P 's < 0.05). The CXCR4 staining in PCNSL was also more pronounced in GBM ( P = 0.048). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that a combination of TBR, MTV, and ADC min (quantitative model 1) had a superior AUC of 0.913 in distinguishing PCNSL from GBM, outperforming single parameters (all P 's < 0.05). For differentiating atypical PCNSL from GBM, single quantitatively parameters showed moderate performance (AUC, 0.655-0.767). Further combining TBR with ADC min (quantitative model 2) significantly improve the AUC to 0.883. Multiparameter models, incorporating significant quantitative and qualitative MRI features, achieved AUCs of 0.953 (PCNSL vs GBM) and 0.902 (atypical PCNSL vs GBM), significantly outperforming single parameters (all P 's < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>68 Ga-pentixafor PET in combination with MRI provides valuable diagnostic information in differentiating PCNSL from GBM, especially for atypical PCNSL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":"50 4","pages":"324-331"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purposes: This study aims to investigate the diagnostic performance of combining 68 Ga-pentixafor PET with MRI to differentiate primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from glioblastoma (GBM), particularly focusing on atypical lymphoma identification.

Patients and methods: Seventy-one PCNSL and 53 GBM patients who underwent both 68 Ga-pentixafor PET/CT and MRI were retrospectively included. We evaluated the quantitative imaging parameters and MRI features of positive lesions, identifying atypical PCNSL by hemorrhage, necrosis, or heterogeneous enhancement. Logistic regression identified key variables, and the ROC-AUC evaluated their diagnostic value. Immunohistochemistry for CXCR4 was performed.

Results: PCNSLs, including 23 atypical cases, showed higher SUV max and TBR, and lower MTV, ADC min , and relative ADC min (rADC min ) than GBMs (all P 's < 0.05). The CXCR4 staining in PCNSL was also more pronounced in GBM ( P = 0.048). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that a combination of TBR, MTV, and ADC min (quantitative model 1) had a superior AUC of 0.913 in distinguishing PCNSL from GBM, outperforming single parameters (all P 's < 0.05). For differentiating atypical PCNSL from GBM, single quantitatively parameters showed moderate performance (AUC, 0.655-0.767). Further combining TBR with ADC min (quantitative model 2) significantly improve the AUC to 0.883. Multiparameter models, incorporating significant quantitative and qualitative MRI features, achieved AUCs of 0.953 (PCNSL vs GBM) and 0.902 (atypical PCNSL vs GBM), significantly outperforming single parameters (all P 's < 0.05).

Conclusions: 68 Ga-pentixafor PET in combination with MRI provides valuable diagnostic information in differentiating PCNSL from GBM, especially for atypical PCNSL.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信