Distinct Characteristics of Suspected Non-Alzheimer Pathophysiology in Relation to Cognitive Status and Cerebrovascular Burden.

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Min Young Chun, Yu Hyun Park, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Jun Pyo Kim, Sang Won Seo, Hyemin Jang
{"title":"Distinct Characteristics of Suspected Non-Alzheimer Pathophysiology in Relation to Cognitive Status and Cerebrovascular Burden.","authors":"Min Young Chun, Yu Hyun Park, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Jun Pyo Kim, Sang Won Seo, Hyemin Jang","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the report: </strong>This study investigated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology (SNAP) across varying cognitive statuses and cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included 1992 participants with cognitive status categorized as cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. β-amyloid (Aβ, A) positivity was assessed by Aβ PET, and neurodegeneration (N) positivity was determined through hippocampal volume. Participants were further divided by the presence or absence of severe CSVD. The clinical and imaging characteristics of A-N+ (SNAP) group were compared with those of the A-N- and A+N+ groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SNAP participants were older and had more vascular risk factors compared with A-N- and A+N+ in the CSVD(-) cohort. SNAP and A+N+ showed similar cortical thinning. At the dementia stage, SNAP had a cognitive trajectory similar to A+N+ in the CSVD(-) cohort. However, SNAP exhibited less cognitive decline than A+N+ in the CSVD(+) cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNAP is characterized by distinct clinical and imaging characteristics; however, it does not necessarily indicate a benign prognosis, particularly at the dementia stage. These findings highlight the need to assess SNAP in relation to the cognitive stage and CSVD presence to better understand its progression and guide interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the report: This study investigated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology (SNAP) across varying cognitive statuses and cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden.

Patients and methods: We included 1992 participants with cognitive status categorized as cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. β-amyloid (Aβ, A) positivity was assessed by Aβ PET, and neurodegeneration (N) positivity was determined through hippocampal volume. Participants were further divided by the presence or absence of severe CSVD. The clinical and imaging characteristics of A-N+ (SNAP) group were compared with those of the A-N- and A+N+ groups.

Results: SNAP participants were older and had more vascular risk factors compared with A-N- and A+N+ in the CSVD(-) cohort. SNAP and A+N+ showed similar cortical thinning. At the dementia stage, SNAP had a cognitive trajectory similar to A+N+ in the CSVD(-) cohort. However, SNAP exhibited less cognitive decline than A+N+ in the CSVD(+) cohort.

Conclusions: SNAP is characterized by distinct clinical and imaging characteristics; however, it does not necessarily indicate a benign prognosis, particularly at the dementia stage. These findings highlight the need to assess SNAP in relation to the cognitive stage and CSVD presence to better understand its progression and guide interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信