Min Young Chun, Yu Hyun Park, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Jun Pyo Kim, Sang Won Seo, Hyemin Jang
{"title":"Distinct Characteristics of Suspected Non-Alzheimer Pathophysiology in Relation to Cognitive Status and Cerebrovascular Burden.","authors":"Min Young Chun, Yu Hyun Park, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Jun Pyo Kim, Sang Won Seo, Hyemin Jang","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the report: </strong>This study investigated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology (SNAP) across varying cognitive statuses and cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included 1992 participants with cognitive status categorized as cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. β-amyloid (Aβ, A) positivity was assessed by Aβ PET, and neurodegeneration (N) positivity was determined through hippocampal volume. Participants were further divided by the presence or absence of severe CSVD. The clinical and imaging characteristics of A-N+ (SNAP) group were compared with those of the A-N- and A+N+ groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SNAP participants were older and had more vascular risk factors compared with A-N- and A+N+ in the CSVD(-) cohort. SNAP and A+N+ showed similar cortical thinning. At the dementia stage, SNAP had a cognitive trajectory similar to A+N+ in the CSVD(-) cohort. However, SNAP exhibited less cognitive decline than A+N+ in the CSVD(+) cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNAP is characterized by distinct clinical and imaging characteristics; however, it does not necessarily indicate a benign prognosis, particularly at the dementia stage. These findings highlight the need to assess SNAP in relation to the cognitive stage and CSVD presence to better understand its progression and guide interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of the report: This study investigated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology (SNAP) across varying cognitive statuses and cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden.
Patients and methods: We included 1992 participants with cognitive status categorized as cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. β-amyloid (Aβ, A) positivity was assessed by Aβ PET, and neurodegeneration (N) positivity was determined through hippocampal volume. Participants were further divided by the presence or absence of severe CSVD. The clinical and imaging characteristics of A-N+ (SNAP) group were compared with those of the A-N- and A+N+ groups.
Results: SNAP participants were older and had more vascular risk factors compared with A-N- and A+N+ in the CSVD(-) cohort. SNAP and A+N+ showed similar cortical thinning. At the dementia stage, SNAP had a cognitive trajectory similar to A+N+ in the CSVD(-) cohort. However, SNAP exhibited less cognitive decline than A+N+ in the CSVD(+) cohort.
Conclusions: SNAP is characterized by distinct clinical and imaging characteristics; however, it does not necessarily indicate a benign prognosis, particularly at the dementia stage. These findings highlight the need to assess SNAP in relation to the cognitive stage and CSVD presence to better understand its progression and guide interventions.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty.
Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.