Cannabis involvement in posttraumatic stress disorder emergency department visits after cannabis legalization.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Laurent Perrault-Sequeira, Michael Pugliese, Rachael MacDonald-Spracklin, Jennifer Xiao, Stephen McCarthy, Daniel T Myran
{"title":"Cannabis involvement in posttraumatic stress disorder emergency department visits after cannabis legalization.","authors":"Laurent Perrault-Sequeira, Michael Pugliese, Rachael MacDonald-Spracklin, Jennifer Xiao, Stephen McCarthy, Daniel T Myran","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have an elevated risk of cannabis use disorder. However, the effect of cannabis legalization on use among individuals with PTSD is unclear. We evaluated changes in cannabis involvement in emergency department (ED) visits for PTSD after medical and nonmedical legalization in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This repeated cross-sectional study used health administrative data to identify all ED visits for PTSD among Ontario residents aged 10-105 between 2008 and 2022 (n = 15.7 million). We identified PTSD ED visits with a co-diagnosis of cannabis (main exposure) or alcohol (control condition) and examined changes across four policy periods (medical legalization with restrictions, expanded medical legalization, nonmedical legalization with restrictions, and nonmedical commercial expansion) using Poisson models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 381,450 PTSD ED visits, 4593 (1.29%) co-involved cannabis and 11,625 (3.05%) co-involved alcohol. Rates of cannabis involvement in PTSD ED visits increased by 151% (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]: 2.51; 95% CI: 2.24, 2.82) between the first and last policy periods (0.13 vs. 0.33 per 100,000 individuals), while alcohol-involvement increased by 58% (IRR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.47, 1.68). Cannabis involvement in PTSD ED visits increased steadily over the study period, with no significant association between policy periods and this trend.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Cannabis involvement in PTSD ED visits has increased over time during a period of liberalization of cannabis policy, but may be attributed to increased access and normalization rather than policy changes directly.</p><p><strong>Scientific significance: </strong>Findings underscore the need for improved detection of and targeted interventions for disordered cannabis use among individuals with PTSD in regions with legalized cannabis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal on Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.70014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have an elevated risk of cannabis use disorder. However, the effect of cannabis legalization on use among individuals with PTSD is unclear. We evaluated changes in cannabis involvement in emergency department (ED) visits for PTSD after medical and nonmedical legalization in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: This repeated cross-sectional study used health administrative data to identify all ED visits for PTSD among Ontario residents aged 10-105 between 2008 and 2022 (n = 15.7 million). We identified PTSD ED visits with a co-diagnosis of cannabis (main exposure) or alcohol (control condition) and examined changes across four policy periods (medical legalization with restrictions, expanded medical legalization, nonmedical legalization with restrictions, and nonmedical commercial expansion) using Poisson models.

Results: Among 381,450 PTSD ED visits, 4593 (1.29%) co-involved cannabis and 11,625 (3.05%) co-involved alcohol. Rates of cannabis involvement in PTSD ED visits increased by 151% (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]: 2.51; 95% CI: 2.24, 2.82) between the first and last policy periods (0.13 vs. 0.33 per 100,000 individuals), while alcohol-involvement increased by 58% (IRR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.47, 1.68). Cannabis involvement in PTSD ED visits increased steadily over the study period, with no significant association between policy periods and this trend.

Discussion and conclusions: Cannabis involvement in PTSD ED visits has increased over time during a period of liberalization of cannabis policy, but may be attributed to increased access and normalization rather than policy changes directly.

Scientific significance: Findings underscore the need for improved detection of and targeted interventions for disordered cannabis use among individuals with PTSD in regions with legalized cannabis.

大麻合法化后,大麻参与创伤后应激障碍急诊科就诊。
背景和目的:患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的个体患大麻使用障碍的风险较高。然而,大麻合法化对PTSD患者使用大麻的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了加拿大安大略省医疗和非医疗大麻合法化后PTSD患者急诊室(ED)就诊情况的变化。方法:这项重复的横断面研究使用卫生管理数据来确定2008年至2022年间安大略省10-105岁居民因PTSD就诊的所有ED (n = 1570万)。我们用泊松模型确定了PTSD ED就诊与大麻(主要暴露)或酒精(对照条件)的共同诊断,并检查了四个政策时期(有限制的医疗合法化、扩大的医疗合法化、有限制的非医疗合法化和非医疗商业扩张)的变化。结果:381450例PTSD急诊科就诊中,4593例(1.29%)与大麻有关,11625例(3.05%)与酒精有关。创伤后应激障碍ED就诊中涉及大麻的比例增加了151%(发病率比[IRR]: 2.51;95% CI: 2.24, 2.82) (0.13 vs 0.33 / 10万人),而酗酒增加了58% (IRR: 1.58;95% ci: 1.47, 1.68)。在研究期间,因大麻而就诊的PTSD患者稳步增加,政策时期与这一趋势之间没有显著关联。讨论和结论:在大麻政策自由化期间,PTSD ED就诊中涉及大麻的情况随着时间的推移而增加,但可能归因于获取和正常化的增加,而不是直接归因于政策变化。科学意义:研究结果强调,在大麻合法化地区,需要改进对PTSD患者大麻使用障碍的检测和有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Addictions is the official journal of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry. The Academy encourages research on the etiology, prevention, identification, and treatment of substance abuse; thus, the journal provides a forum for the dissemination of information in the extensive field of addiction. Each issue of this publication covers a wide variety of topics ranging from codependence to genetics, epidemiology to dual diagnostics, etiology to neuroscience, and much more. Features of the journal, all written by experts in the field, include special overview articles, clinical or basic research papers, clinical updates, and book reviews within the area of addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信