Tradition and Transmutation: A Diachronic Analysis on the Logic of Competitive Collective Action in the Tibetan Borderlands of Gan-Qing-Chuan, China

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Zheng Xiong
{"title":"Tradition and Transmutation: A Diachronic Analysis on the Logic of Competitive Collective Action in the Tibetan Borderlands of Gan-Qing-Chuan, China","authors":"Zheng Xiong","doi":"10.1002/crq.21457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper presents a unique approach to the study of Chinese ethnic group conflicts, diverging from the conventional focus on external factors such as macro-causal analysis and strategy research. Instead, it delves into the internal theme of group conflicts, namely “the logic of collective action,” and analyzes its manifestations in the Tibetan borderlands of Gansu, Qinghai, and Sichuan China across two distinct historical periods: the tribal society period and the contemporary era. The findings indicate that in the contemporary Tibetan borderlands of Gansu, Qinghai, and Sichuan, the ideological discourses of “collective responsibility” and religion as mobilizing mechanisms have tended to diminish in influence, while the structural social mentality has grown in strength. While deliberations and oaths (<i>mengshi</i>) still constitute the preliminary phase to collective action, the subsequent action has shifted from predominantly “armed struggle” to the combination of “struggle and negotiation (<i>wenzheng wudou</i>),” and the framework of collective action from “retributive justice” to “restorative (distributive) justice,” embodied in “<i>li</i> (precedent)” and “<i>li</i> (reason).” The evolution of this logic of collective action is the inevitable result of the changing mechanism of power relations following the implantation of a new political power system in Tibetan borderland society.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39736,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","volume":"42 3","pages":"401-412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crq.21457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a unique approach to the study of Chinese ethnic group conflicts, diverging from the conventional focus on external factors such as macro-causal analysis and strategy research. Instead, it delves into the internal theme of group conflicts, namely “the logic of collective action,” and analyzes its manifestations in the Tibetan borderlands of Gansu, Qinghai, and Sichuan China across two distinct historical periods: the tribal society period and the contemporary era. The findings indicate that in the contemporary Tibetan borderlands of Gansu, Qinghai, and Sichuan, the ideological discourses of “collective responsibility” and religion as mobilizing mechanisms have tended to diminish in influence, while the structural social mentality has grown in strength. While deliberations and oaths (mengshi) still constitute the preliminary phase to collective action, the subsequent action has shifted from predominantly “armed struggle” to the combination of “struggle and negotiation (wenzheng wudou),” and the framework of collective action from “retributive justice” to “restorative (distributive) justice,” embodied in “li (precedent)” and “li (reason).” The evolution of this logic of collective action is the inevitable result of the changing mechanism of power relations following the implantation of a new political power system in Tibetan borderland society.

传统与嬗变:甘清川藏族边疆地区竞争集体行动逻辑的历时性分析
本文从宏观原因分析、策略研究等外部因素入手,为研究中国族群冲突提供了独特的视角。相反,它深入探讨了群体冲突的内在主题,即“集体行动的逻辑”,并分析了它在中国甘肃,青海和四川的西藏边境地区的两个不同历史时期的表现:部落社会时期和当代时代。研究结果表明,在当代甘肃、青海、四川等藏族边疆地区,“集体责任”和宗教作为动员机制的意识形态话语的影响力有减弱的趋势,而结构性社会心态的力量却在增强。虽然审议和宣誓仍然构成集体行动的初步阶段,但随后的行动已经从主要的“武装斗争”转向“斗争与谈判”的结合,集体行动的框架从“报应正义”转向“恢复(分配)正义”,体现在“先例”和“理”上。这种集体行动逻辑的演变,是西藏边疆社会新政治权力体系植入后,权力关系变化机制的必然结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Conflict Resolution Quarterly Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Conflict Resolution Quarterly publishes quality scholarship on relationships between theory, research, and practice in the conflict management and dispute resolution field to promote more effective professional applications. A defining focus of the journal is the relationships among theory, research, and practice. Articles address the implications of theory for practice and research directions, how research can better inform practice, and how research can contribute to theory development with important implications for practice. Articles also focus on all aspects of the conflict resolution process and context with primary focus on the behavior, role, and impact of third parties in effectively handling conflict.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信