{"title":"Risk stratification of residual abscess after surgical treatment for gastroduodenal perforation","authors":"Kana Ishikawa, Siyuan Yao, Takashi Kumode, Keisuke Tanino, Yugo Matsui, Shusaku Honma, Shinichi Hosokawa, Teppei Murakami, Takatsugu Kan, Sanae Nakajima","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Residual abscess is a major complication after emergency surgery for gastroduodenal (GD) perforation. However, there is little evidence regarding potential risk factors contributing to its development. Establishing a risk stratification strategy would be valuable for the entire management process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 115 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for GD perforation between 2010 and 2023 at a secondary emergency care hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of residual abscesses. Potential risk factors for abscess formation were evaluated from various aspects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The incidence of residual abscesses was 19.1% (22 of 115). Multivariable analysis revealed that current use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (odds ratio [OR] 3.76, <i>p</i> = 0.037), cancer chemotherapy (OR 13.56, <i>p</i> = 0.005), and preoperative renal dysfunction (OR 4.72, <i>p</i> = 0.018) were independent predictors. A potential scoring model could be created using these three parameters, and the number of risk factors correlated with the likelihood of developing a residual abscess (0 vs. 1 vs. ≥2; 6.2% vs. 29.4% vs. 50.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). From a bacteriological point of view, the presence of <i>Enterococcus</i> in the ascites culture was closely related to its occurrence with 100% probability. Moreover, regarding early detection of this complication, C-reactive protein on postoperative d 5 had the highest predictive ability with an area under the curve of 0.818.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The risk of residual abscess formation after surgical treatment of GD perforation can be assessed utilizing both preoperative and postoperative information.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 2","pages":"263-270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12877","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
Residual abscess is a major complication after emergency surgery for gastroduodenal (GD) perforation. However, there is little evidence regarding potential risk factors contributing to its development. Establishing a risk stratification strategy would be valuable for the entire management process.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 115 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for GD perforation between 2010 and 2023 at a secondary emergency care hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of residual abscesses. Potential risk factors for abscess formation were evaluated from various aspects.
Results
The incidence of residual abscesses was 19.1% (22 of 115). Multivariable analysis revealed that current use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (odds ratio [OR] 3.76, p = 0.037), cancer chemotherapy (OR 13.56, p = 0.005), and preoperative renal dysfunction (OR 4.72, p = 0.018) were independent predictors. A potential scoring model could be created using these three parameters, and the number of risk factors correlated with the likelihood of developing a residual abscess (0 vs. 1 vs. ≥2; 6.2% vs. 29.4% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.001). From a bacteriological point of view, the presence of Enterococcus in the ascites culture was closely related to its occurrence with 100% probability. Moreover, regarding early detection of this complication, C-reactive protein on postoperative d 5 had the highest predictive ability with an area under the curve of 0.818.
Conclusion
The risk of residual abscess formation after surgical treatment of GD perforation can be assessed utilizing both preoperative and postoperative information.
目的残余脓肿是胃十二指肠穿孔急诊手术后的主要并发症。然而,几乎没有证据表明潜在的风险因素有助于其发展。建立风险分层战略对整个管理过程是有价值的。方法本研究为单中心回顾性研究,分析了2010年至2023年间在二级急救医院连续接受GD穿孔手术的115例患者。根据是否存在残余脓肿将患者分为两组。从多方面评价脓肿形成的潜在危险因素。结果残余脓肿发生率为19.1%(22 / 115)。多变量分析显示,目前使用非甾体类抗炎药物(优势比[OR] 3.76, p = 0.037)、癌症化疗(优势比[OR] 13.56, p = 0.005)和术前肾功能不全(优势比[OR] 4.72, p = 0.018)是独立的预测因素。使用这三个参数可以创建一个潜在评分模型,风险因素的数量与发生残余脓肿的可能性相关(0 vs. 1 vs.≥2;6.2% vs 29.4% vs 50.0%, p < 0.001)。从细菌学角度来看,腹水培养中肠球菌的存在与其发生密切相关,概率为100%。此外,对于该并发症的早期发现,术后第5天c反应蛋白的预测能力最高,曲线下面积为0.818。结论GD穿孔术后残留脓肿形成的风险可综合术前术后信息进行评估。