Depth-dependent patterns in soil organic C, enzymatic stochiometric ratio, and soil quality under conventional tillage and reduced tillage after 55-years

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wenhao Feng , Juanjuan Ai , Antonio Rafael Sánchez-Rodríguez , Shiwei Li , Wentao Zhang , Haishui Yang , Antonios Apostolakis , Christiane Muenter , Feng-Min Li , Michaela A. Dippold , Jie Zhou , Klaus Dittert , Haitao Wang
{"title":"Depth-dependent patterns in soil organic C, enzymatic stochiometric ratio, and soil quality under conventional tillage and reduced tillage after 55-years","authors":"Wenhao Feng ,&nbsp;Juanjuan Ai ,&nbsp;Antonio Rafael Sánchez-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Shiwei Li ,&nbsp;Wentao Zhang ,&nbsp;Haishui Yang ,&nbsp;Antonios Apostolakis ,&nbsp;Christiane Muenter ,&nbsp;Feng-Min Li ,&nbsp;Michaela A. Dippold ,&nbsp;Jie Zhou ,&nbsp;Klaus Dittert ,&nbsp;Haitao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interest in managing agroecosystems for improving soil health has driven the application of conservation practices, such as reduced tillage. However, our understanding remains limited regarding changes in soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial resource limitations, and soil ecosystem multifunctionality across the soil profile (not just in the upper layers) following long-term reduced tillage as compared to conventional tillage. This study aimed to compare the impacts of reduced tillage (RT) and conventional tillage (CT) on SOC storage, soil enzyme activities, and ecosystem functionality in a 90 cm soil profile. Soil cores were collected from four different soil depths (0–10, 10–30, 30–50, 50–90 cm) in a 55-year field experiment (crop rotation primarily featured cereals) in central Germany comparing RT (rotary harrow, 5–8 cm depth) and CT (mouldboard plough, 25 cm depth). Results showed that RT increases SOC content by 24 % at 0–10 cm depth but decreases SOC content by 22 % at 10–30 cm depth relative to CT. The enhanced SOC content under RT further improved soil ecosystem multifunctionality by a factor of 2.8 at 0–10 cm compared to CT. Notably, higher available nitrogen (N) content increased vector length at 0–10 cm depth under RT, related to the higher production and release of C-acquisition enzymes. In contrast, the higher exudation of N-acquiring enzymes found at 10–50 cm depth indicated N limitation for microorganisms under RT. At this depth, CT alleviated microbial N limitation. Moreover, RT lowered SOC stock by 24 % compared to CT at 10–30 cm, resulting in an 11 % decrease in SOC across the entire 0–90 cm soil profile. In conclusion, while reduced tillage improved soil ecosystem functionality in the 0–10 cm, it may not enhance SOC sequestration, highlighting the importance of considering the whole soil profile when comparing the SOC sequestration potential of different tillage practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 109584"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925001161","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in managing agroecosystems for improving soil health has driven the application of conservation practices, such as reduced tillage. However, our understanding remains limited regarding changes in soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial resource limitations, and soil ecosystem multifunctionality across the soil profile (not just in the upper layers) following long-term reduced tillage as compared to conventional tillage. This study aimed to compare the impacts of reduced tillage (RT) and conventional tillage (CT) on SOC storage, soil enzyme activities, and ecosystem functionality in a 90 cm soil profile. Soil cores were collected from four different soil depths (0–10, 10–30, 30–50, 50–90 cm) in a 55-year field experiment (crop rotation primarily featured cereals) in central Germany comparing RT (rotary harrow, 5–8 cm depth) and CT (mouldboard plough, 25 cm depth). Results showed that RT increases SOC content by 24 % at 0–10 cm depth but decreases SOC content by 22 % at 10–30 cm depth relative to CT. The enhanced SOC content under RT further improved soil ecosystem multifunctionality by a factor of 2.8 at 0–10 cm compared to CT. Notably, higher available nitrogen (N) content increased vector length at 0–10 cm depth under RT, related to the higher production and release of C-acquisition enzymes. In contrast, the higher exudation of N-acquiring enzymes found at 10–50 cm depth indicated N limitation for microorganisms under RT. At this depth, CT alleviated microbial N limitation. Moreover, RT lowered SOC stock by 24 % compared to CT at 10–30 cm, resulting in an 11 % decrease in SOC across the entire 0–90 cm soil profile. In conclusion, while reduced tillage improved soil ecosystem functionality in the 0–10 cm, it may not enhance SOC sequestration, highlighting the importance of considering the whole soil profile when comparing the SOC sequestration potential of different tillage practices.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信