Technostress among teachers: A systematic literature review and future research agenda

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Dong Yang , Jialin Liu , Huanhuan Wang , Peng Chen , Chaoyi Wang , Ahmed Hosny Saleh Metwally
{"title":"Technostress among teachers: A systematic literature review and future research agenda","authors":"Dong Yang ,&nbsp;Jialin Liu ,&nbsp;Huanhuan Wang ,&nbsp;Peng Chen ,&nbsp;Chaoyi Wang ,&nbsp;Ahmed Hosny Saleh Metwally","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technostress refers to an individual’s inability to engage with emerging computer technologies in a constructive and healthy manner. Moreover, teaching is increasingly recognized as a stressful profession, with recent studies indicating a rise in technostress among educators. However, current research has failed to holistically map the sources, outcomes, and mitigation strategies for technostress among teachers. In this systematic review, we analyzed 54 studies sourced from Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science to outline the landscape of technostress and identify key factors, including sources, outcomes, and strategies for mitigation. Our findings reveal a notable increase in research on teachers’ technostress since 2018, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a predominant focus on studies from Asia and a significant absence of perspectives from North America. Common identified sources of technostress include technological factors, workplace conditions, and personal perceptions. Furthermore, the findings emphasize that technostress affects teachers’ well-being and overall job performance. Although research on the mitigation of technostress remains limited, several effective strategies have emerged at the personal (e.g., boosting resilience, promoting information technology mindfulness, and fostering meaningful work perceptions) and organizational (e.g., enhancing digital literacy, providing organizational flexibility, and offering technical support) levels. Finally, despite the current studies covering the sources and consequences of technostress, they provide an incomplete understanding of the formation of technostress. Overall, the gap in the literature highlights the urgent need to investigate the formation and mitigation of technostress among teachers at all levels. Our review provides up-to-date information for researchers, educators, and teachers about technostress and its mitigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 108619"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000664","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technostress refers to an individual’s inability to engage with emerging computer technologies in a constructive and healthy manner. Moreover, teaching is increasingly recognized as a stressful profession, with recent studies indicating a rise in technostress among educators. However, current research has failed to holistically map the sources, outcomes, and mitigation strategies for technostress among teachers. In this systematic review, we analyzed 54 studies sourced from Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science to outline the landscape of technostress and identify key factors, including sources, outcomes, and strategies for mitigation. Our findings reveal a notable increase in research on teachers’ technostress since 2018, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a predominant focus on studies from Asia and a significant absence of perspectives from North America. Common identified sources of technostress include technological factors, workplace conditions, and personal perceptions. Furthermore, the findings emphasize that technostress affects teachers’ well-being and overall job performance. Although research on the mitigation of technostress remains limited, several effective strategies have emerged at the personal (e.g., boosting resilience, promoting information technology mindfulness, and fostering meaningful work perceptions) and organizational (e.g., enhancing digital literacy, providing organizational flexibility, and offering technical support) levels. Finally, despite the current studies covering the sources and consequences of technostress, they provide an incomplete understanding of the formation of technostress. Overall, the gap in the literature highlights the urgent need to investigate the formation and mitigation of technostress among teachers at all levels. Our review provides up-to-date information for researchers, educators, and teachers about technostress and its mitigation.
教师的技术压力:系统文献综述与未来研究议程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信