Healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED rates for cardiac arrest in U.S. nursing homes

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Elan Jiang , Rohan Raj , Charles Sherrod , Dan Nguyen , Kevin Kennedy , Paul S. Chan
{"title":"Healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED rates for cardiac arrest in U.S. nursing homes","authors":"Elan Jiang ,&nbsp;Rohan Raj ,&nbsp;Charles Sherrod ,&nbsp;Dan Nguyen ,&nbsp;Kevin Kennedy ,&nbsp;Paul S. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing home residents are typically excluded in studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Since nursing homes have on-site healthcare staff, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) for OHCA would ideally be 100% before arrival of 9-1-1 emergency responders. However, little is known about healthcare provider bystander response and the degree of variability in initiating CPR and AED use in nursing homes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Within the U.S. CARES registry, we identified 71,530 adults at nursing homes who had resuscitation initiated for OHCA between 2013–2021. We assessed rates of bystander CPR and AED application by nursing home healthcare staff. Using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression, we quantified variation in healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED application rates using the median odds ratio (OR), which estimates the difference in odds that 2 similar patients with OHCA would receive healthcare provider bystander CPR or have an AED applied at two randomly selected nursing homes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean age was 74 ± 13 years and 53.5% were men. Overall, 58,814 (82.2%) patients received healthcare provider bystander CPR and 20,302 (28.4%) had an AED applied. Among 4014 nursing homes with ≥5 OHCAs (<em>n</em> = 42,399), the median OR for healthcare provider bystander CPR was 2.13 (95% CI: 2.05–2.22) and the median OR for healthcare provider bystander AED application was 4.54 (95% CI: 4.31–4.76), both suggesting several-fold variation in treatment across nursing homes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In U.S. nursing homes, healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED application rates were not ideal, with large variation in both rates across sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nursing home residents are typically excluded in studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Since nursing homes have on-site healthcare staff, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) for OHCA would ideally be 100% before arrival of 9-1-1 emergency responders. However, little is known about healthcare provider bystander response and the degree of variability in initiating CPR and AED use in nursing homes.

Methods

Within the U.S. CARES registry, we identified 71,530 adults at nursing homes who had resuscitation initiated for OHCA between 2013–2021. We assessed rates of bystander CPR and AED application by nursing home healthcare staff. Using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression, we quantified variation in healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED application rates using the median odds ratio (OR), which estimates the difference in odds that 2 similar patients with OHCA would receive healthcare provider bystander CPR or have an AED applied at two randomly selected nursing homes.

Results

Mean age was 74 ± 13 years and 53.5% were men. Overall, 58,814 (82.2%) patients received healthcare provider bystander CPR and 20,302 (28.4%) had an AED applied. Among 4014 nursing homes with ≥5 OHCAs (n = 42,399), the median OR for healthcare provider bystander CPR was 2.13 (95% CI: 2.05–2.22) and the median OR for healthcare provider bystander AED application was 4.54 (95% CI: 4.31–4.76), both suggesting several-fold variation in treatment across nursing homes.

Conclusion

In U.S. nursing homes, healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED application rates were not ideal, with large variation in both rates across sites.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信