Sustainability assessment of ultra-high performance concrete made with various supplementary cementitious materials

Leila Farahzadi , Saeed Bozorgmehr Nia , Behrouz Shafei , Mahdi Kioumarsi
{"title":"Sustainability assessment of ultra-high performance concrete made with various supplementary cementitious materials","authors":"Leila Farahzadi ,&nbsp;Saeed Bozorgmehr Nia ,&nbsp;Behrouz Shafei ,&nbsp;Mahdi Kioumarsi","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2025.100301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) is widely recognized for its exceptional strength and durability, making it a preferred choice in modern concrete construction. However, the high cement content of conventional UHPC mixtures causes environmental concerns, particularly in terms of carbon footprint. To address such concerns, this study presents a comprehensive sustainability assessment of various UHPC mixtures that incorporate high volumes of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), including ground granulated blast furnace (GGBF) slag and fly ash, individually and in combination, as partial replacements for cement. The use of alternative SCMs also addresses the reliance of UHPC mixtures on silica fume. While beneficial for a range of concrete properties, silica fume poses challenges, in terms of cost and potential particulate emission during handling and mixing. A detailed life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed in the current study to evaluate the environmental impacts of alternative UHPC mixture designs, considering key factors, such as resource utilization, energy consumption, water use, raw material transportation, and production processes. In contrast with past research that primarily focused on simple CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent metrics, this study assessed 14 distinct environmental impact categories, offering a unique and holistic contribution to UHPC sustainability research. The findings demonstrated that incorporating up to 50% GGBF slag as cement replacement significantly reduces the UHPC’s environmental impacts without jeopardizing the main mechanical and durability characteristics. This research underscores the critical role of industrial by-products in enhancing sustainable construction practices and offers practical solutions for adopting low-impact concrete production methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397625000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) is widely recognized for its exceptional strength and durability, making it a preferred choice in modern concrete construction. However, the high cement content of conventional UHPC mixtures causes environmental concerns, particularly in terms of carbon footprint. To address such concerns, this study presents a comprehensive sustainability assessment of various UHPC mixtures that incorporate high volumes of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), including ground granulated blast furnace (GGBF) slag and fly ash, individually and in combination, as partial replacements for cement. The use of alternative SCMs also addresses the reliance of UHPC mixtures on silica fume. While beneficial for a range of concrete properties, silica fume poses challenges, in terms of cost and potential particulate emission during handling and mixing. A detailed life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed in the current study to evaluate the environmental impacts of alternative UHPC mixture designs, considering key factors, such as resource utilization, energy consumption, water use, raw material transportation, and production processes. In contrast with past research that primarily focused on simple CO2-equivalent metrics, this study assessed 14 distinct environmental impact categories, offering a unique and holistic contribution to UHPC sustainability research. The findings demonstrated that incorporating up to 50% GGBF slag as cement replacement significantly reduces the UHPC’s environmental impacts without jeopardizing the main mechanical and durability characteristics. This research underscores the critical role of industrial by-products in enhancing sustainable construction practices and offers practical solutions for adopting low-impact concrete production methods.
各种补充胶凝材料配制的超高性能混凝土的可持续性评价
超高性能混凝土(UHPC)因其卓越的强度和耐久性而得到广泛认可,成为现代混凝土建筑的首选。然而,传统UHPC混合物的高水泥含量引起了环境问题,特别是在碳足迹方面。为了解决这些问题,本研究对各种UHPC混合物进行了全面的可持续性评估,这些混合物包含大量补充胶凝材料(SCMs),包括磨粒高炉(GGBF)矿渣和粉煤灰,单独或组合使用,作为水泥的部分替代品。替代scm的使用也解决了UHPC混合物对硅灰的依赖。虽然硅灰有利于一系列混凝土性能,但在处理和混合过程中的成本和潜在颗粒排放方面提出了挑战。本研究采用详细的生命周期评估(LCA)来评估不同的UHPC混合料设计对环境的影响,考虑了资源利用、能源消耗、水使用、原材料运输和生产过程等关键因素。与过去主要关注简单的二氧化碳当量指标的研究不同,本研究评估了14种不同的环境影响类别,为UHPC的可持续性研究提供了独特而全面的贡献。研究结果表明,掺入高达50%的GGBF矿渣作为水泥替代品可以显著降低UHPC的环境影响,同时不会损害其主要的机械和耐久性特性。本研究强调了工业副产品在加强可持续建筑实践中的关键作用,并为采用低影响混凝土生产方法提供了切实可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信