Differential impacts of cigarette tax increases on health equity in the United States

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sunday Azagba, Todd Ebling, Alperen Korkmaz
{"title":"Differential impacts of cigarette tax increases on health equity in the United States","authors":"Sunday Azagba,&nbsp;Todd Ebling,&nbsp;Alperen Korkmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Our study investigates the health equity implications of higher cigarette taxes by examining the differential responses among various sociodemographic groups in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Repeated observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study utilizes a nationally representative, cross-sectional dataset (n = 1,236,126) from the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Study (1992–2019). We employ a logistic regression model with two-way fixed effects analysis to examine the response of smoking participation to combined federal and state cigarette taxes, stratified by sociodemographic characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our findings revealed variability in cigarette tax sensitivity across sociodemographic groups. Males, younger adults, metropolitan residents, Hispanics, individuals with higher education, higher-income individuals, and part-time employees were more responsive to tax changes than their counterparts. Those with less than a high school degree were the least responsive among education groups, and individuals with household incomes below $49,999 were the least responsive among income groups. A 10 % increase in cigarette tax reduces smoking by 2.94 % in individuals aged 18–24, 1.91 % in those aged 25–44, and 1.77 % in those aged 45–64. With year- and state-fixed effects, the responsiveness for the youngest group decreases to −0.135, with similar patterns observed in other age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These differential responses highlight the potential of tax policy as a tool for promoting health equity. However, tax policy alone may not be sufficient to reduce smoking rates and improve health outcomes in the least responsive groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 94-100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Our study investigates the health equity implications of higher cigarette taxes by examining the differential responses among various sociodemographic groups in the United States.

Study design

Repeated observational study.

Methods

This study utilizes a nationally representative, cross-sectional dataset (n = 1,236,126) from the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Study (1992–2019). We employ a logistic regression model with two-way fixed effects analysis to examine the response of smoking participation to combined federal and state cigarette taxes, stratified by sociodemographic characteristics.

Results

Our findings revealed variability in cigarette tax sensitivity across sociodemographic groups. Males, younger adults, metropolitan residents, Hispanics, individuals with higher education, higher-income individuals, and part-time employees were more responsive to tax changes than their counterparts. Those with less than a high school degree were the least responsive among education groups, and individuals with household incomes below $49,999 were the least responsive among income groups. A 10 % increase in cigarette tax reduces smoking by 2.94 % in individuals aged 18–24, 1.91 % in those aged 25–44, and 1.77 % in those aged 45–64. With year- and state-fixed effects, the responsiveness for the youngest group decreases to −0.135, with similar patterns observed in other age groups.

Conclusions

These differential responses highlight the potential of tax policy as a tool for promoting health equity. However, tax policy alone may not be sufficient to reduce smoking rates and improve health outcomes in the least responsive groups.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信