A simple experiment to improve adherence for taking the oral contraceptive pill: An exploratory study of behavioural mechanisms

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Caitlin Liddelow, Barbara A. Mullan, Mark Boyes
{"title":"A simple experiment to improve adherence for taking the oral contraceptive pill: An exploratory study of behavioural mechanisms","authors":"Caitlin Liddelow,&nbsp;Barbara A. Mullan,&nbsp;Mark Boyes","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Full adherence is imperative to ensure the prevention of unintended pregnancies, which have serious health and financial impacts on women. Previous research has identified the importance of cues (habit-based) and providing information from a credible source (non-habit-based) in facilitating adherence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A 6 week experiment was developed to increase adherence to the pill (primary outcome) as well as increase habit strength for taking the pill (secondary outcome).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A sample of Australians who menstruate (<i>N</i> = 77, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 25.18, <i>SD</i> = 3.49) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) a control group, (2) receiving information from a credible source, (3) implementing a daily cue, and (4) receiving both the information and instructions to implement a cue. At baseline and six-weeks, participants completed two measures of adherence to the pill, and a measure of habit strength.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Mixed-model ANOVAs revealed no significant changes in adherence to the pill across conditions, over time. There was a significant increase in habit strength over time (<i>η</i>2 = .11), across all conditions (<i>η</i>2 = .11). However, these changes did not significantly differ by condition (<i>p</i> = .071).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest participating in an experiment, regardless of condition, may make taking the pill more salient and thus increase habit strength. It also suggests that providing information from a credible source nor associating taking the pill with a daily cue substantially increased adherence. However, adherence was positively skewed and therefore these findings need to be further explored with individuals with lower adherence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12788","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Full adherence is imperative to ensure the prevention of unintended pregnancies, which have serious health and financial impacts on women. Previous research has identified the importance of cues (habit-based) and providing information from a credible source (non-habit-based) in facilitating adherence.

Design

A 6 week experiment was developed to increase adherence to the pill (primary outcome) as well as increase habit strength for taking the pill (secondary outcome).

Methods

A sample of Australians who menstruate (N = 77, Mage = 25.18, SD = 3.49) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) a control group, (2) receiving information from a credible source, (3) implementing a daily cue, and (4) receiving both the information and instructions to implement a cue. At baseline and six-weeks, participants completed two measures of adherence to the pill, and a measure of habit strength.

Results

Mixed-model ANOVAs revealed no significant changes in adherence to the pill across conditions, over time. There was a significant increase in habit strength over time (η2 = .11), across all conditions (η2 = .11). However, these changes did not significantly differ by condition (p = .071).

Conclusions

These findings suggest participating in an experiment, regardless of condition, may make taking the pill more salient and thus increase habit strength. It also suggests that providing information from a credible source nor associating taking the pill with a daily cue substantially increased adherence. However, adherence was positively skewed and therefore these findings need to be further explored with individuals with lower adherence.

Abstract Image

目标 要确保预防意外怀孕,就必须完全坚持避孕,因为意外怀孕会对妇女的健康和经济造成严重影响。以往的研究表明,提示(基于习惯)和从可信来源提供信息(非基于习惯)对促进坚持服药非常重要。 设计 进行为期 6 周的实验,以提高服用避孕药的依从性(主要结果),并增强服用避孕药的习惯强度(次要结果)。 方法 将月经期的澳大利亚人样本(N = 77,Mage = 25.18,SD = 3.49)随机分配到四个条件中的一个:(1) 对照组;(2) 接收来自可信来源的信息;(3) 实施每日提示;(4) 同时接收信息和实施提示的说明。在基线和六周的时间里,参与者完成了两项对服药依从性的测量,以及一项对习惯强度的测量。 结果 混合模型方差分析显示,在不同条件下,服药依从性随时间的推移没有显著变化。随着时间的推移,习惯强度在所有条件下都有明显增加(η2 = .11)。然而,这些变化在不同条件下没有明显差异(p = .071)。 结论 这些研究结果表明,无论在什么条件下,参与实验都会使服药变得更加突出,从而增强习惯的强度。研究还表明,提供可信来源的信息或将服药与每日提示联系起来都会大大提高坚持率。然而,坚持率是正向倾斜的,因此需要对坚持率较低的个体进一步探讨这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信