A Stable Poro-Mechanical Formulation for Material Point Methods Leveraging Overlapping Meshes and Multi-Field Ghost Penalisation

IF 2.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Giuliano Pretti, Robert E. Bird, Nathan D. Gavin, William M. Coombs, Charles E. Augarde
{"title":"A Stable Poro-Mechanical Formulation for Material Point Methods Leveraging Overlapping Meshes and Multi-Field Ghost Penalisation","authors":"Giuliano Pretti,&nbsp;Robert E. Bird,&nbsp;Nathan D. Gavin,&nbsp;William M. Coombs,&nbsp;Charles E. Augarde","doi":"10.1002/nme.7630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Material Point Method (MPM) is widely used to analyse coupled (solid-water) problems under large deformations/displacements. However, if not addressed carefully, MPM u-p formulations for poromechanics can be affected by two major sources of instability. Firstly, inf-sup condition violation can arise when the spaces for the displacement and pressure fields are not chosen correctly, resulting in an unstable pressure field when the equations are monolithically solved. Secondly, the intrinsic nature of particle-based discretisation makes the MPM an unfitted mesh-based method, which can affect the system's condition number and solvability, particularly when background mesh elements are poorly populated. This work proposes a solution to both problems. The inf-sup condition is avoided using two overlapping meshes, a coarser one for the pressure and a finer one for the displacement. This approach does not require stabilisation of the primary equations since it is stable by design and is particularly valuable for low-order shape functions. As for the system's poor condition number, a face ghost penalisation method is added to both the primary equations, which constitutes a novelty in the context of MPM mixed formulations. This study frequently makes use of the theories of functional analysis or the unfitted Finite Element Method (FEM). Although these theories may not directly apply to the MPM, they provide a robust and logical basis for the research. These rationales are further supported by four numerical examples, which encompass both elastic and elasto-plastic cases and drained and undrained conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","volume":"126 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nme.7630","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nme.7630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Material Point Method (MPM) is widely used to analyse coupled (solid-water) problems under large deformations/displacements. However, if not addressed carefully, MPM u-p formulations for poromechanics can be affected by two major sources of instability. Firstly, inf-sup condition violation can arise when the spaces for the displacement and pressure fields are not chosen correctly, resulting in an unstable pressure field when the equations are monolithically solved. Secondly, the intrinsic nature of particle-based discretisation makes the MPM an unfitted mesh-based method, which can affect the system's condition number and solvability, particularly when background mesh elements are poorly populated. This work proposes a solution to both problems. The inf-sup condition is avoided using two overlapping meshes, a coarser one for the pressure and a finer one for the displacement. This approach does not require stabilisation of the primary equations since it is stable by design and is particularly valuable for low-order shape functions. As for the system's poor condition number, a face ghost penalisation method is added to both the primary equations, which constitutes a novelty in the context of MPM mixed formulations. This study frequently makes use of the theories of functional analysis or the unfitted Finite Element Method (FEM). Although these theories may not directly apply to the MPM, they provide a robust and logical basis for the research. These rationales are further supported by four numerical examples, which encompass both elastic and elasto-plastic cases and drained and undrained conditions.

Abstract Image

利用重叠网格和多场幽灵惩罚的材料点方法的稳定孔隙力学公式
材料点法(MPM)被广泛用于分析大变形/位移下的耦合(固-水)问题。然而,如果不仔细处理,孔隙力学的MPM u-p公式可能受到两个主要不稳定性来源的影响。首先,当位移场和压力场的空间选择不正确时,会产生不稳定条件,导致方程整体求解时压力场不稳定。其次,基于粒子的离散化的固有性质使得粒子点法是一种不拟合的基于网格的方法,这会影响系统的条件数和可解性,特别是当背景网格单元填充不足时。这项工作提出了一个解决这两个问题的方法。使用两个重叠的网格,一个较粗的网格用于压力,一个较细的网格用于位移,避免了不一致的情况。这种方法不需要稳定的初级方程,因为它是稳定的设计,是特别有价值的低阶形状函数。对于系统的不良状态数,在两个主方程中都加入了脸鬼惩罚方法,这在MPM混合公式中是一个新颖的方法。该研究经常使用功能分析理论或非拟合有限元法(FEM)。虽然这些理论可能不能直接应用于MPM,但它们为研究提供了坚实的逻辑基础。这些理论得到了四个数值例子的进一步支持,其中包括弹性和弹塑性情况以及排水和不排水条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
276
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering publishes original papers describing significant, novel developments in numerical methods that are applicable to engineering problems. The Journal is known for welcoming contributions in a wide range of areas in computational engineering, including computational issues in model reduction, uncertainty quantification, verification and validation, inverse analysis and stochastic methods, optimisation, element technology, solution techniques and parallel computing, damage and fracture, mechanics at micro and nano-scales, low-speed fluid dynamics, fluid-structure interaction, electromagnetics, coupled diffusion phenomena, and error estimation and mesh generation. It is emphasized that this is by no means an exhaustive list, and particularly papers on multi-scale, multi-physics or multi-disciplinary problems, and on new, emerging topics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信