The Cross-Race Effect in Lineups Versus Showups

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Kyros J. Shen, Shiqi Chen, John T. Wixted
{"title":"The Cross-Race Effect in Lineups Versus Showups","authors":"Kyros J. Shen,&nbsp;Shiqi Chen,&nbsp;John T. Wixted","doi":"10.1002/acp.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A witness's ability to discriminate innocent from guilty suspects is reliably higher for same-race than for cross-race faces. We investigated the relative magnitude of this well-established effect in lineups versus showups. Based on diagnostic feature-detection theory, we hypothesized that the cross-race effect (CRE) for showups would be larger than that for lineups. However, contrary to our predictions, a similarly strong CRE was observed for showups and lineups, and high-confidence accuracy trended lower in the cross-race condition regardless of presentation format (showup vs. lineup). These results may indicate that witnesses did not initially encode certain diagnostic features of cross-race faces that might otherwise be put to good use in lineups. Moreover, the apparent failure of participants to adjust for the lower discriminability in the cross-race situation when expressing confidence may indicate that they may not fully appreciate how much more difficult it is to identify faces of a different race.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A witness's ability to discriminate innocent from guilty suspects is reliably higher for same-race than for cross-race faces. We investigated the relative magnitude of this well-established effect in lineups versus showups. Based on diagnostic feature-detection theory, we hypothesized that the cross-race effect (CRE) for showups would be larger than that for lineups. However, contrary to our predictions, a similarly strong CRE was observed for showups and lineups, and high-confidence accuracy trended lower in the cross-race condition regardless of presentation format (showup vs. lineup). These results may indicate that witnesses did not initially encode certain diagnostic features of cross-race faces that might otherwise be put to good use in lineups. Moreover, the apparent failure of participants to adjust for the lower discriminability in the cross-race situation when expressing confidence may indicate that they may not fully appreciate how much more difficult it is to identify faces of a different race.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Applied Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Applied Cognitive Psychology seeks to publish the best papers dealing with psychological analyses of memory, learning, thinking, problem solving, language, and consciousness as they occur in the real world. Applied Cognitive Psychology will publish papers on a wide variety of issues and from diverse theoretical perspectives. The journal focuses on studies of human performance and basic cognitive skills in everyday environments including, but not restricted to, studies of eyewitness memory, autobiographical memory, spatial cognition, skill training, expertise and skilled behaviour. Articles will normally combine realistic investigations of real world events with appropriate theoretical analyses and proper appraisal of practical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信