A Compromised Maxillofacial Wound Healing Model for Characterization of Particulate Bone Grafting: An In Vivo Study in Rabbits

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nourhan Hussein, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Neeraja Dharmaraj, Nicholas A. Mirsky, William Norton, Lori Ramagli, Ramesh Tailor, F. Kurtis Kasper, Paulo G. Coelho, Lukasz Witek, Simon Young
{"title":"A Compromised Maxillofacial Wound Healing Model for Characterization of Particulate Bone Grafting: An In Vivo Study in Rabbits","authors":"Nourhan Hussein,&nbsp;Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak,&nbsp;Neeraja Dharmaraj,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Mirsky,&nbsp;William Norton,&nbsp;Lori Ramagli,&nbsp;Ramesh Tailor,&nbsp;F. Kurtis Kasper,&nbsp;Paulo G. Coelho,&nbsp;Lukasz Witek,&nbsp;Simon Young","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Preclinical testing of tissue engineering modalities are commonly performed in a healthy wound bed. These conditions do not represent clinically relevant compromised oral wound environments due to radiation treatments seen clinically. This study aimed to characterize the bone regeneration outcomes in critical-sized mandibular defects using particulate grafting in an irradiated preclinical model of compromised wound healing. Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 8/group), namely (i) irradiated (experimental) and (ii) non-irradiated (control). The rabbits in the experimental group received a total of 36 Gy radiation, followed by surgical intervention to create critical-sized (10 mm), full-thickness mandibular defects. The control group was subjected to the same surgical intervention. All defects were filled with bovine bone grafting material (Bio-Oss, Geistlich, Princeton, NJ, USA) and allowed to heal for 8 weeks. At the study endpoint, rabbits were euthanized, and their mandibles were harvested for micro-computed tomographic, histological, and histomorphometric processing and analysis. Qualitative histological analysis revealed increased levels of bone formation and bridging in the control group relative to the experimental group. This was accompanied by increased levels of soft tissue presence in the experimental group. Volumetric reconstruction showed a significantly higher degree of bone in the control group (27.59% ± 2.71), relative to the experimental group (22.02% ± 2.71) (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The irradiated rabbit model exhibited decreased bone regeneration capacity relative to the healthy subjects, highlighting its suitability as a robust compromised wound healing environment for further preclinical testing involving growth factors or customized, high-fidelity 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preclinical testing of tissue engineering modalities are commonly performed in a healthy wound bed. These conditions do not represent clinically relevant compromised oral wound environments due to radiation treatments seen clinically. This study aimed to characterize the bone regeneration outcomes in critical-sized mandibular defects using particulate grafting in an irradiated preclinical model of compromised wound healing. Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups (n = 8/group), namely (i) irradiated (experimental) and (ii) non-irradiated (control). The rabbits in the experimental group received a total of 36 Gy radiation, followed by surgical intervention to create critical-sized (10 mm), full-thickness mandibular defects. The control group was subjected to the same surgical intervention. All defects were filled with bovine bone grafting material (Bio-Oss, Geistlich, Princeton, NJ, USA) and allowed to heal for 8 weeks. At the study endpoint, rabbits were euthanized, and their mandibles were harvested for micro-computed tomographic, histological, and histomorphometric processing and analysis. Qualitative histological analysis revealed increased levels of bone formation and bridging in the control group relative to the experimental group. This was accompanied by increased levels of soft tissue presence in the experimental group. Volumetric reconstruction showed a significantly higher degree of bone in the control group (27.59% ± 2.71), relative to the experimental group (22.02% ± 2.71) (p = 0.001). The irradiated rabbit model exhibited decreased bone regeneration capacity relative to the healthy subjects, highlighting its suitability as a robust compromised wound healing environment for further preclinical testing involving growth factors or customized, high-fidelity 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信