Comparative evaluation of different rock mass and slope mass rating systems for road cut slopes along National Highway 7, from Rudraprayag to Joshimath in Uttarakhand, India

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shubham Chaudhary, Anindya Pain, Shantanu Sarkar
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of different rock mass and slope mass rating systems for road cut slopes along National Highway 7, from Rudraprayag to Joshimath in Uttarakhand, India","authors":"Shubham Chaudhary,&nbsp;Anindya Pain,&nbsp;Shantanu Sarkar","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12167-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Himalayan Mountain ranges are very sensitive to geohazards like landslides, earthquakes, cloudbursts, and flash floods because they are known for their neotectonics activity. The geomechanical behaviour of road cut slopes along National Highway 7 (NH-7), from Rudraprayag to Joshimath in the Garhwal Himalayas, is significantly influenced by lithological diversity, tectonic discontinuities, and external triggering variables like seismic activity and precipitation. This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of multiple rock mass and slope mass classification systems, specifically Rock Mass Rating (RMRbasic), Slope Mass Rating (SMR), Continuous Slope Mass Rating (CoSMR), Chinese Slope Mass Rating (CSMR), Geological Strength Index (GSI), and Q-slope, across 18 selected slope sections with diverse lithologies. Kinematic analysis via stereographic projection discovered failure modes, revealing planar, wedge, and toppling mechanisms associated with joint orientations and slope geometries. CoSMR, which incorporates continuous functions for adjustment factors (F1, F2, and F3), offered superior resolution for stability classification relative to conventional SMR and CSMR techniques. The RMRbasic values varied from 33 to 73, with quartzite and gneissic slopes demonstrating elevated stability indices, whereas phyllite, dolostone, and slate slopes were categorized as severely unstable due to diminished RMRbasic, GSI, and Q-slope values. The Q-slope approach, which integrates environmental influences and stress reduction factors (SRF), yielded Q-values ranging from 0.01 to 0.25, facilitating the calculation of critical slope angles by Barton’s empirical formula. The results indicate that CoSMR provides enhanced accuracy in intricate terrains through its continuous parameter scaling, whereas Q-slope yields reliable forecasts for slope angle stability across different probabilities of failure (PoF). This work offers improved geomechanical understanding for optimizing slope design, excavation techniques, and stabilization strategies in seismically active and rainfall-prone areas of the Himalayas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12167-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Himalayan Mountain ranges are very sensitive to geohazards like landslides, earthquakes, cloudbursts, and flash floods because they are known for their neotectonics activity. The geomechanical behaviour of road cut slopes along National Highway 7 (NH-7), from Rudraprayag to Joshimath in the Garhwal Himalayas, is significantly influenced by lithological diversity, tectonic discontinuities, and external triggering variables like seismic activity and precipitation. This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of multiple rock mass and slope mass classification systems, specifically Rock Mass Rating (RMRbasic), Slope Mass Rating (SMR), Continuous Slope Mass Rating (CoSMR), Chinese Slope Mass Rating (CSMR), Geological Strength Index (GSI), and Q-slope, across 18 selected slope sections with diverse lithologies. Kinematic analysis via stereographic projection discovered failure modes, revealing planar, wedge, and toppling mechanisms associated with joint orientations and slope geometries. CoSMR, which incorporates continuous functions for adjustment factors (F1, F2, and F3), offered superior resolution for stability classification relative to conventional SMR and CSMR techniques. The RMRbasic values varied from 33 to 73, with quartzite and gneissic slopes demonstrating elevated stability indices, whereas phyllite, dolostone, and slate slopes were categorized as severely unstable due to diminished RMRbasic, GSI, and Q-slope values. The Q-slope approach, which integrates environmental influences and stress reduction factors (SRF), yielded Q-values ranging from 0.01 to 0.25, facilitating the calculation of critical slope angles by Barton’s empirical formula. The results indicate that CoSMR provides enhanced accuracy in intricate terrains through its continuous parameter scaling, whereas Q-slope yields reliable forecasts for slope angle stability across different probabilities of failure (PoF). This work offers improved geomechanical understanding for optimizing slope design, excavation techniques, and stabilization strategies in seismically active and rainfall-prone areas of the Himalayas.

印度北阿坎德邦从Rudraprayag到Joshimath的7号国道路堑边坡不同岩体和边坡质量等级系统的比较评价
喜马拉雅山脉对山体滑坡、地震、暴雨和山洪暴发等地质灾害非常敏感,因为它们以新构造活动而闻名。Garhwal喜马拉雅山脉从Rudraprayag到Joshimath的7号国道(NH-7)路堑边坡的地质力学行为受到岩性多样性、构造不连续以及地震活动和降水等外部触发变量的显著影响。本研究对多种岩体和边坡质量分类系统进行了全面的比较分析,特别是岩体质量等级(RMRbasic)、边坡质量等级(SMR)、连续边坡质量等级(CoSMR)、中国边坡质量等级(CSMR)、地质强度指数(GSI)和Q-slope,选择了18个不同岩性的边坡断面。通过立体投影的运动学分析发现了破坏模式,揭示了与关节方向和斜坡几何形状相关的平面、楔形和倾倒机制。与传统的SMR和CSMR技术相比,CoSMR结合了调节因子(F1, F2和F3)的连续函数,提供了更好的稳定性分类分辨率。RMRbasic值在33 ~ 73之间变化,石英岩和片麻岩边坡稳定性指数较高,而千层岩、白云岩和板岩边坡由于RMRbasic值、GSI值和Q-slope值的降低而被归类为严重不稳定。综合环境影响和应力减小因子(SRF)的Q-slope方法得到的q值在0.01 ~ 0.25之间,便于根据Barton经验公式计算临界斜率。结果表明,CoSMR通过其连续的参数缩放,在复杂地形中提供了更高的精度,而Q-slope可以可靠地预测不同失效概率(PoF)下的坡角稳定性。这项工作为优化喜马拉雅地震活跃和降雨易发地区的边坡设计、开挖技术和稳定策略提供了更好的地质力学理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信